c0e550245a
This patch improves the Octavia API handling of HTTP Accept headers and ensures the response content type will always be application/json. Prior to this fix, requests with wildcard Accept headers may have received a response from the API in a format other than JSON. Story: 2010447 Task: 46932 Change-Id: Ia557ccb4b9d7576acce308e851ca742624f91d88
676 lines
28 KiB
ReStructuredText
676 lines
28 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. -*- rst -*-
|
||
|
||
This section introduces readers to OpenStack Octavia v2 ReSTful HTTP API and
|
||
provides guidelines on how to use it.
|
||
|
||
.. note::
|
||
To clarify the Octavia API versioning we have updated the endpoint to
|
||
support both the previously documented /v2.0 and the new path of /v2.
|
||
They are exactly the same API and /v2.0 will be a supported alias for the
|
||
life of the v2 API.
|
||
|
||
Service Endpoints
|
||
=================
|
||
|
||
All API calls described throughout the rest of this document require
|
||
authentication with the `OpenStack Identity service
|
||
<https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/>`_. After authentication, the
|
||
base ``endpoint URL`` for the ``service type`` of ``load-balancer`` and
|
||
``service name`` of ``octavia`` can be extracted from the service catalog
|
||
returned with the identity token.
|
||
|
||
**Example token snippet with service catalog**
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
"token": {
|
||
"catalog": [
|
||
{
|
||
"endpoints": [
|
||
{
|
||
"url": "http://198.51.100.10:9876/",
|
||
"interface": "public",
|
||
"region": "RegionOne",
|
||
"region_id": "RegionOne",
|
||
"id": "cd1c3c2dc6434c739ed0a12015373754"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"type": "load-balancer",
|
||
"id": "1209701aecd3453e9803119cd28cb013",
|
||
"name": "octavia"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
For instance, if the ``endpoint URL`` is ``http://198.51.100.10:9876/`` then
|
||
the full API call for ``/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers`` is
|
||
``http://198.51.100.10:9876/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers``.
|
||
|
||
Depending on the deployment, the ``load-balancer`` ``endpoint URL`` might be
|
||
http or https, a custom port, a custom path, and include your project id. The
|
||
only way to know the URLs for your deployment is by using the service catalog.
|
||
The ``load-balancer`` ``endpoint URL`` should never be hard coded in
|
||
applications, even if they are only expected to work at a single site. It
|
||
should always be discovered from the Identity token.
|
||
|
||
As such, for the rest of this document we will be using short hand where ``GET
|
||
/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers`` really means ``GET
|
||
{your_load-balancer_endpoint_URL}/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers``.
|
||
|
||
Neutron-lbaas and Octavia v2 APIs
|
||
=================================
|
||
|
||
The Octavia v2 API is fully backward compatible with the neutron-lbaas v2 API
|
||
and is a superset of the neutron-lbaas v2 API. This is intended to provide a
|
||
simple migration path for deployments currently using the neutron-lbaas v2 API.
|
||
You can update the endpoint your application is using from the keystone
|
||
service catalog to use the ``octavia`` endpoint instead of the ``neutron``
|
||
endpoint for load balancer activities.
|
||
|
||
During the neutron-lbaas deprecation period a pass-through proxy will be
|
||
included in neutron to allow requests via neutron and the neutron-lbaas v2 API
|
||
to continue to function. Users are strongly encouraged to update their
|
||
applications to access load balancing via the Octavia v2 API.
|
||
|
||
.. warning::
|
||
|
||
Load balancing functions accessed via the neutron endpoint are deprecated
|
||
and will be removed in a future release. Users are strongly encouraged to
|
||
migrate to using the octavia endpoint.
|
||
|
||
Authentication and authorization
|
||
================================
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 uses the `OpenStack Identity service
|
||
<https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/>`_ as the default authentication
|
||
service. When Keystone is enabled, users that submit requests to the Octavia
|
||
service must provide an authentication token in **X-Auth-Token** request
|
||
header. You obtain the token by authenticating to the Keystone endpoint.
|
||
|
||
When Keystone is enabled, the ``project_id`` attribute is not required in create
|
||
requests because the project ID is derived from the authentication token.
|
||
|
||
The default authorization settings allow only administrative users to create
|
||
resources on behalf of a different project.
|
||
|
||
Octavia uses information received from Keystone to authorize user requests.
|
||
Octavia Networking handles the following types of authorization policies:
|
||
|
||
- **Operation-based policies** specify access criteria for specific
|
||
operations, possibly with fine-grained control over specific attributes.
|
||
|
||
- **Resource-based policies** access a specific resource. Permissions might or
|
||
might not be granted depending on the permissions configured for the
|
||
resource. Currently available for only the network resource.
|
||
|
||
The actual authorization policies enforced in Octavia might vary from
|
||
deployment to deployment.
|
||
|
||
Request and response formats
|
||
============================
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 supports JSON data serialization request and response
|
||
formats only.
|
||
|
||
Request format
|
||
--------------
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 only accepts requests with the JSON data serialization
|
||
format. The request must have no ``Accept`` header or an ``Accept`` header that
|
||
is compatible with ``application/json``. The one exception is the Oslo
|
||
middleware healthcheck endpoint.
|
||
|
||
Response format
|
||
---------------
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 always responds with the JSON data serialization
|
||
format. The one exception is the Oslo middleware healthcheck endpoint.
|
||
|
||
Query extension
|
||
A ``.json`` extension can be added to the request URI. For example, the
|
||
``.json`` extension in the following requests are equivalent:
|
||
|
||
- **GET** *publicURL*/loadbalancers
|
||
|
||
- **GET** *publicURL*/loadbalancers.json
|
||
|
||
.. _filtering:
|
||
|
||
Filtering and column selection
|
||
==============================
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 supports filtering based on all top level attributes of
|
||
a resource. Filters are applicable to all list requests.
|
||
|
||
For example, the following request returns all loadbalancers named ``foobar``:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers?name=foobar
|
||
|
||
When you specify multiple filters, the Octavia API v2 returns only objects
|
||
that meet all filtering criteria. The operation applies an AND condition among
|
||
the filters.
|
||
|
||
Note
|
||
----
|
||
|
||
Octavia does not offer an OR mechanism for filters.
|
||
|
||
Alternatively, you can issue a distinct request for each filter and build a
|
||
response set from the received responses on the client-side.
|
||
|
||
Filtering by Tags
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
**New in version 2.5**
|
||
|
||
Most Octavia resources support adding tags to the resource attributes.
|
||
Octavia supports advanced filtering using these tags. The following tag
|
||
filters are supported by the Octavia API:
|
||
|
||
- ``tags`` - Return the list of entities that have this tag or tags.
|
||
- ``tags-any`` - Return the list of entities that have one or more of the
|
||
given tags.
|
||
- ``not-tags`` - Return the list of entities that do not have one or more
|
||
of the given tags.
|
||
- ``not-tags-any`` - Return the list of entities that do not have at least
|
||
one of the given tags.
|
||
|
||
When supplying a list of tags, the tags should be provided in a comma separated
|
||
list.
|
||
|
||
For example, if you would like to get the list of load balancers with both the
|
||
"red" and "blue" tags you would request:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers?tags=red,blue
|
||
|
||
To get a list of load balancers that have the "red" or "blue" tag, you would
|
||
request:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers?tags-any=red,blue
|
||
|
||
For a list of load balancers that do not have the "red" tag, you would request:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers?not-tags=red
|
||
|
||
To get a list of load balancers that don't have either the "red" or "blue" tag
|
||
you would request:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers?not-tags-any=red,blue
|
||
|
||
Tag filters can also be combined in the same request:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers?tags=red,blue&tags-any=green,orange
|
||
|
||
Column Selection
|
||
----------------
|
||
|
||
By default, Octavia returns all attributes for any show or list call. The
|
||
Octavia API v2 has a mechanism to limit the set of attributes returned.
|
||
For example, return ``id``.
|
||
|
||
You can use the ``fields`` query parameter to control the attributes returned
|
||
from the Octavia API v2.
|
||
|
||
For example, the following request returns only ``id`` and ``name`` for each
|
||
load balancer:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?fields=id&fields=name
|
||
|
||
Synchronous versus asynchronous plug-in behavior
|
||
================================================
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 presents a logical model of load balancers consisting
|
||
of listeners, pools, and members. It is up to the OpenStack Octavia plug-in
|
||
to communicate with the underlying infrastructure to ensure load balancing
|
||
is consistent with the logical model. A plug-in might perform these
|
||
operations asynchronously.
|
||
|
||
When an API client modifies the logical model by issuing an HTTP **POST**,
|
||
**PUT**, or **DELETE** request, the API call might return before the plug-in
|
||
modifies underlying virtual and physical load balancing devices. However, an
|
||
API client is guaranteed that all subsequent API calls properly reflect the
|
||
changed logical model.
|
||
|
||
For example, if a client issues an HTTP **PUT** request to set the weight
|
||
of a member, there is no guarantee that the new weight will be in effect when
|
||
the HTTP call returns. This is indicated by an HTTP response code of 202.
|
||
|
||
You can use the ``provisioning_status`` attribute to determine whether the
|
||
Octavia plug-in has successfully completed the configuration of the resource.
|
||
|
||
Bulk-create
|
||
===========
|
||
|
||
The Octavia v2 API does not support bulk create. You cannot create more than
|
||
one load balancer per API call.
|
||
|
||
The Octavia v2 API does support single call create which allows you to
|
||
create a fully populated load balancer in one API call. This is discussed
|
||
in the load balancer create section of this reference.
|
||
|
||
Pagination
|
||
==========
|
||
|
||
To reduce load on the service, list operations will return a maximum number of
|
||
items at a time. To navigate the collection, the parameters limit, marker and
|
||
page\_reverse can be set in the URI. For example:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
?limit=100&marker=1234&page_reverse=False
|
||
|
||
The ``marker`` parameter is the ID of the last item in the previous list. The
|
||
``limit`` parameter sets the page size. The ``page_reverse`` parameter sets
|
||
the page direction. These parameters are optional. If the client requests a
|
||
limit beyond the maximum limit configured by the deployment, the server returns
|
||
the maximum limit number of items.
|
||
|
||
For convenience, list responses contain atom "next" links and "previous" links.
|
||
The last page in the list requested with 'page\_reverse=False' will not contain
|
||
"next" link, and the last page in the list requested with 'page\_reverse=True'
|
||
will not contain "previous" link. The following examples illustrate two pages
|
||
with three items. The first page was retrieved through:
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET http://198.51.100.10:9876/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?limit=2
|
||
|
||
If a particular plug-in does not support pagination operations the Octavia API
|
||
v2 will emulate the pagination behavior so that users can expect the same
|
||
behavior regardless of the particular plug-in running in the background.
|
||
|
||
**Example load balancer list, first page: JSON request**
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?limit=2 HTTP/1.1
|
||
Host: 198.51.100.10:9876
|
||
Content-Type: application/json
|
||
Accept: application/json
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Example load balancer list, first page: JSON response**
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
"loadbalancers": [
|
||
{
|
||
"admin_state_up": true,
|
||
"listeners": [],
|
||
"vip_subnet_id": "08dce793-daef-411d-a896-d389cd45b1ea",
|
||
"pools": [],
|
||
"provider": "octavia",
|
||
"description": "Best App load balancer 1",
|
||
"name": "bestapplb1",
|
||
"operating_status": "ONLINE",
|
||
"id": "34d5f4a5-cbbc-43a0-878f-b8a26370e6e7",
|
||
"provisioning_status": "ACTIVE",
|
||
"vip_port_id": "1e20d91d-8df9-4c15-9778-28bc89226c19",
|
||
"vip_address": "203.0.113.10",
|
||
"project_id": "bf325b04-e7b1-4002-9b10-f4984630367f"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"admin_state_up": true,
|
||
"listeners": [],
|
||
"vip_subnet_id": "08dce793-daef-411d-a896-d389cd45b1ea",
|
||
"pools": [],
|
||
"provider": "octavia",
|
||
"description": "Second Best App load balancer 1",
|
||
"name": "2ndbestapplb1",
|
||
"operating_status": "ONLINE",
|
||
"id": "0fdb0ca7-0a38-4aea-891c-daaed40bcafe",
|
||
"provisioning_status": "ACTIVE",
|
||
"vip_port_id": "21f7ac04-6824-4222-93cf-46e0d70607f9",
|
||
"vip_address": "203.0.113.20",
|
||
"project_id": "bf325b04-e7b1-4002-9b10-f4984630367f"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"loadbalancers_links": [
|
||
{
|
||
"href": "http://198.51.100.10:9876/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?limit=2&marker=0fdb0ca7-0a38-4aea-891c-daaed40bcafe",
|
||
"rel": "next"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"href": "http://198.51.100.10:9876/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?limit=2&marker=34d5f4a5-cbbc-43a0-878f-b8a26370e6e7&page_reverse=True",
|
||
"rel": "previous"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
The last page won't show the "next" links
|
||
|
||
**Example load balancer list, last page: JSON request**
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
GET /v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?limit=2&marker=4ef465f3-0233-44af-b93d-9d3eae4daf85 HTTP/1.1
|
||
Host: 198.51.100.10:9876
|
||
Content-Type: application/json
|
||
Accept: application/json
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Example load balancer list, last page: JSON response**
|
||
|
||
.. code::
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
"loadbalancers": [
|
||
{
|
||
"admin_state_up": true,
|
||
"listeners": [],
|
||
"vip_subnet_id": "08dce793-daef-411d-a896-d389cd45b1ea",
|
||
"pools": [],
|
||
"provider": "octavia",
|
||
"description": "Other App load balancer 1",
|
||
"name": "otherapplb1",
|
||
"operating_status": "ONLINE",
|
||
"id": "4ef465f3-0233-44af-b93d-9d3eae4daf85",
|
||
"provisioning_status": "ACTIVE",
|
||
"vip_port_id": "f777a1c7-7f59-4a36-ad34-24dfebaf19e6",
|
||
"vip_address": "203.0.113.50",
|
||
"project_id": "bf325b04-e7b1-4002-9b10-f4984630367f"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"loadbalancers_links": [
|
||
{
|
||
"href": "http://198.51.100.10:9876/v2/lbaas/loadbalancers.json?limit=2&marker=4ef465f3-0233-44af-b93d-9d3eae4daf85&page_reverse=True",
|
||
"rel": "previous"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
Sorting
|
||
=======
|
||
|
||
Sorting is determined through the use of the 'sort' query string parameter. The
|
||
value of this parameter is a comma-separated list of sort keys. Sort directions
|
||
can optionally be appended to each sort key, separated by the ':' character.
|
||
|
||
The supported sort directions are either 'asc' for ascending or 'desc' for
|
||
descending.
|
||
|
||
The caller may (but is not required to) specify a sort direction for each key.
|
||
If a sort direction is not specified for a key, then a default is set by the
|
||
server.
|
||
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
- Only sort keys specified:
|
||
|
||
+ ``sort=key1,key2,key3``
|
||
+ 'key1' is the first key, 'key2' is the second key, etc.
|
||
+ Sort directions are defaulted by the server
|
||
|
||
- Some sort directions specified:
|
||
|
||
+ ``sort=key1:asc,key2,key3``
|
||
+ Any sort key without a corresponding direction is defaulted
|
||
+ 'key1' is the first key (ascending order), 'key2' is the second key
|
||
(direction defaulted by the server), etc.
|
||
|
||
- Equal number of sort keys and directions specified:
|
||
|
||
+ ``sort=key1:asc,key2:desc,key3:asc``
|
||
+ Each key is paired with the corresponding direction
|
||
+ 'key1' is the first key (ascending order), 'key2' is the second key
|
||
(descending order), etc.
|
||
|
||
You can also use the ``sort_key`` and ``sort_dir`` parameters to sort the
|
||
results of list operations. Currently sorting does not work with extended
|
||
attributes of resource. The ``sort_key`` and ``sort_dir`` can be repeated,
|
||
and the number of ``sort_key`` and ``sort_dir`` provided must be same. The
|
||
``sort_dir`` parameter indicates in which direction to sort. Acceptable
|
||
values are ``asc`` (ascending) and ``desc`` (descending).
|
||
|
||
If a particular plug-in does not support sorting operations the Octavia API
|
||
v2 emulates the sorting behavior so that users can expect the same behavior
|
||
regardless of the particular plug-in that runs in the background.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Response Codes
|
||
==============
|
||
|
||
The following HTTP response status codes are used by the Octavia v2 API.
|
||
|
||
Success
|
||
-------
|
||
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Code | Description |
|
||
+======+================================================================+
|
||
| 200 | - The synchronous request was successful |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 202 | - The asynchronous request was accepted and is being processed |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 204 | - The request was successful, no content to return |
|
||
| | - The entity was successfully deleted |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
Faults
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
The Octavia API v2 returns an error response if a failure occurs while
|
||
processing a request. Octavia uses only standard HTTP error codes.
|
||
4\ *nn* errors indicate problems in the particular request being sent from
|
||
the client.
|
||
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Code | Description |
|
||
+======+================================================================+
|
||
| 400 | - Bad request |
|
||
| | - Malformed request URI or body requested |
|
||
| | - The request could not be understood |
|
||
| | - Invalid values entered |
|
||
| | - Bulk operations disallowed |
|
||
| | - Validation failed |
|
||
| | - Method not allowed for request body (such as trying to |
|
||
| | update attributes that can be specified at create-time only) |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 401 | - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 403 | - Policy does not allow current user to do this operation |
|
||
| | - The project is over quota for the request |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 404 | - Not Found |
|
||
| | - Non existent URI |
|
||
| | - Resource not found |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 409 | - Conflict |
|
||
| | - The resource is in an immutable state |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 500 | - Internal server error |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| 503 | - Service unavailable |
|
||
| | - The project is busy with other requests, try again later |
|
||
+------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
|
||
Status Codes
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Octavia API v2 entities have two status codes present in the response body.
|
||
The ``provisioning_status`` describes the lifecycle status of the entity while
|
||
the ``operating_status`` provides the observed status of the entity.
|
||
|
||
For example, a member may be in a ``provisioning_status`` of ``PENDING_UPDATE``
|
||
and have an ``operating_status`` of ``ONLINE``. This would indicate that an
|
||
update operation is occurring on this member and it is in an immutable state
|
||
but it is healthy and able to service requests. This situation could occur if
|
||
the user made a request to update the weight of the member.
|
||
|
||
.. _op_status:
|
||
|
||
Operating Status Codes
|
||
----------------------
|
||
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Code | Description |
|
||
+============+==============================================================+
|
||
| ONLINE | - Entity is operating normally |
|
||
| | - All pool members are healthy |
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| DRAINING | - The member is not accepting new connections |
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| OFFLINE | - Entity is administratively disabled |
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| DEGRADED | - One or more of the entity's components are in ERROR |
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ERROR | - The entity has failed |
|
||
| | - The member is failing it's health monitoring checks |
|
||
| | - All of the pool members are in ERROR |
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| NO_MONITOR | - No health monitor is configured for this entity and it's |
|
||
| | status is unknown |
|
||
+------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
.. _prov_status:
|
||
|
||
Provisioning Status Codes
|
||
-------------------------
|
||
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Code | Description |
|
||
+================+==========================================================+
|
||
| ACTIVE | - The entity was provisioned successfully |
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| DELETED | - The entity has been successfully deleted |
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ERROR | - Provisioning failed |
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| PENDING_CREATE | - The entity is being created |
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| PENDING_UPDATE | - The entity is being updated |
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| PENDING_DELETE | - The entity is being deleted |
|
||
+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
Entities in a ``PENDING_*`` state are immutable and cannot be modified until
|
||
the requested operation completes. The entity will return to the ``ACTIVE``
|
||
provisioning status once the asynchronus operation completes.
|
||
|
||
An entity in ``ERROR`` has failed provisioning. The entity may be deleted and
|
||
recreated.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. _valid_protocol:
|
||
|
||
Protocol Combinations (Listener/Pool)
|
||
=====================================
|
||
|
||
The listener and pool can be associated through the listener's
|
||
``default_pool_id`` or l7policy's ``redirect_pool_id``. Both listener and pool
|
||
must set the protocol parameter, but the association between the listener and
|
||
the pool isn't arbitrary and has some constraints on the protocol aspect.
|
||
|
||
Valid protocol combinations
|
||
---------------------------
|
||
|
||
.. |1| unicode:: U+2002 .. nut ( )
|
||
.. |2| unicode:: U+2003 .. mutton ( )
|
||
.. |listener| replace:: |2| |2| Listener
|
||
.. |1Y| replace:: |1| Y
|
||
.. |1N| replace:: |1| N
|
||
.. |2Y| replace:: |2| Y
|
||
.. |2N| replace:: |2| N
|
||
.. |8Y| replace:: |2| |2| |2| |2| Y
|
||
.. |8N| replace:: |2| |2| |2| |2| N
|
||
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
|| |listener| || HTTP || HTTPS || SCTP || TCP || TERMINATED_HTTPS || UDP |
|
||
|| Pool || || || || || || |
|
||
+=============+=======+========+=======+======+===================+======+
|
||
| HTTP | |2Y| | |2N| | |2N| | |1Y| | |8Y| | |1N| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
| HTTPS | |2N| | |2Y| | |2N| | |1Y| | |8N| | |1N| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
| PROXY | |2Y| | |2Y| | |2N| | |1Y| | |8Y| | |1N| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
| PROXYV2 | |2Y| | |2Y| | |2N| | |1Y| | |8Y| | |1N| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
| SCTP | |2N| | |2N| | |2Y| | |1N| | |8N| | |1N| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
| TCP | |2N| | |2Y| | |2N| | |1Y| | |8N| | |1N| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
| UDP | |2N| | |2N| | |2N| | |1N| | |8N| | |1Y| |
|
||
+-------------+-------+--------+-------+------+-------------------+------+
|
||
|
||
"Y" means the combination is valid and "N" means invalid.
|
||
|
||
The HTTPS protocol is HTTPS pass-through. For most providers, this is treated
|
||
as a TCP protocol. Some advanced providers may support HTTPS session
|
||
persistence features by using the session ID. The Amphora provider treats
|
||
HTTPS as a TCP flow, but currently does not support HTTPS session persistence
|
||
using the session ID.
|
||
|
||
The pool protocol of PROXY will use the listener protocol as the pool protocol
|
||
but will wrap that protocol in the proxy protocol. In the case of listener
|
||
protocol TERMINATED_HTTPS, a pool protocol of PROXY will be HTTP wrapped in the
|
||
proxy protocol.
|
||
|
||
Protocol Combinations (Pool/Health Monitor)
|
||
===========================================
|
||
|
||
Pools and health monitors are also related with regard to protocol. Pools set
|
||
the protocol parameter for the real member connections, and the health monitor
|
||
sets a type for health checks. Health check types are limited based on the
|
||
protocol of the pool.
|
||
|
||
Valid protocol combinations
|
||
---------------------------
|
||
|
||
.. |Health Monitor| replace:: |2| |2| Health Monitor
|
||
.. |UDPCONNECT| replace:: UDP-CONNECT
|
||
.. |4Y| replace:: |2| |2| Y
|
||
.. |4N| replace:: |2| |2| N
|
||
.. |5Y| replace:: |2| |2| |1| Y
|
||
.. |5N| replace:: |2| |2| |1| N
|
||
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
|| |Health Monitor| || HTTP || HTTPS || PING || SCTP || TCP || TLS-HELLO || |UDPCONNECT| |
|
||
|| Pool || || || || || || || |
|
||
+===================+=======+========+=======+=======+======+============+===============+
|
||
| HTTP | |2Y| | |2Y| | |1Y| | |1N| | |1Y| | |4Y| | |5N| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
| HTTPS | |2Y| | |2Y| | |1Y| | |1N| | |1Y| | |4Y| | |5N| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
| PROXY | |2Y| | |2Y| | |1Y| | |1N| | |1Y| | |4Y| | |5N| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
| PROXYV2 | |2Y| | |2Y| | |1Y| | |1N| | |1Y| | |4Y| | |5N| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
| SCTP | |2Y| | |2N| | |1N| | |1Y| | |1Y| | |4N| | |5Y| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
| TCP | |2Y| | |2Y| | |1Y| | |1N| | |1Y| | |4Y| | |5N| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
| UDP | |2Y| | |2N| | |1N| | |1Y| | |1Y| | |4N| | |5Y| |
|
||
+-------------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+------+------------+---------------+
|
||
|
||
"Y" means the combination is valid and "N" means invalid.
|
||
|
||
These combinations are mostly as you'd expect for all non-UDP/SCTP pool
|
||
protocols: non-UDP/SCTP pools can have health monitors with any check type
|
||
besides UDP-CONNECT and SCTP.
|
||
For UDP or SCTP pools however, things are a little more complicated. UDP and
|
||
SCTP Pools support UDP-CONNECT and SCTP but also HTTP and TCP checks. HTTPS
|
||
checks are technically feasible but have not yet been implemented.
|