From 0716f28e13ab588dd0a4bf334a5daeef6025ac1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shuquan Huang Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:19:56 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix the recommendation about file system of Ceph The current document mentions that ceph developers recommend btrfs as a fs for storage, however this is not the case as btrfs is not yet stable for production clusters and only recommended in not critical environments. Change-Id: Ic8a977c6392e49c8516c27ea20374abc02abcb31 Closes-bug: #1491767 --- .../block-storage/drivers/ceph-rbd-volume-driver.xml | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/config-reference/block-storage/drivers/ceph-rbd-volume-driver.xml b/doc/config-reference/block-storage/drivers/ceph-rbd-volume-driver.xml index 92d5309c42..13ed6f3b09 100644 --- a/doc/config-reference/block-storage/drivers/ceph-rbd-volume-driver.xml +++ b/doc/config-reference/block-storage/drivers/ceph-rbd-volume-driver.xml @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ servers. - Ceph developers recommend that you use Btrfs as a file system - for storage. XFS might be a better alternative for production environments;XFS - is an excellent alternative to Btrfs. The ext4 file system is also compatible but does - not exploit the power of Ceph. + Ceph developers recommend XFS for production deployments, Btrfs + for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. Btrfs has the correct + feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4 provide the + necessary stability for today’s deployments. If using Btrfs, ensure that you use the correct version (see Ceph