Merge "Edits to the arch guide storage focus section"
This commit is contained in:
commit
36144bcd8e
@ -82,10 +82,7 @@
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>Based on the selected storage solution, ensure the
|
||||
connectivity matches the storage solution requirements.
|
||||
For example, if you select a centralized storage array,
|
||||
determine how the hypervisors connect to the storage
|
||||
array. Connectivity can affect latency and thus
|
||||
performance. We recommended confirming that the network
|
||||
We recommended confirming that the network
|
||||
characteristics minimize latency to boost the
|
||||
overall performance of the design.</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
@ -173,7 +170,7 @@
|
||||
a list of these form factors:</para>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>Most blade servers typically support dual-socket
|
||||
<para>Most blade servers support dual-socket
|
||||
multi-core CPUs. Choose either full width or full height
|
||||
blades to avoid the limit. High density blade servers
|
||||
support up to 16 servers in only 10
|
||||
@ -222,11 +219,6 @@
|
||||
that support multiple independent servers in a single
|
||||
2U or 3U enclosure, "sled servers", deliver increased
|
||||
density as compared to a typical 1U-2U rack-mounted servers.</para>
|
||||
<para>For example, many sled servers offer four independent
|
||||
dual-socket nodes in 2U for a total of 8 CPU sockets
|
||||
in 2U. However, the dual-socket limitation on
|
||||
individual nodes may not be sufficient to offset their
|
||||
additional cost and configuration complexity.</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
<para>Other factors that influence server hardware
|
||||
@ -330,7 +322,7 @@
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>Ensure that the physical data
|
||||
center provides the necessary power for the selected
|
||||
network hardware. This is not typically an issue for
|
||||
network hardware. This is not an issue for
|
||||
top of rack (ToR) switches, but may be an issue for
|
||||
spine switches in a leaf and spine fabric, or end of
|
||||
row (EoR) switches.</para>
|
||||
@ -374,9 +366,7 @@
|
||||
on the overall design and also affect server hardware
|
||||
selection. Ensure the selected operating system and
|
||||
hypervisor combination support the storage hardware and work
|
||||
with the networking hardware selection and topology.
|
||||
For example, Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) requires
|
||||
support from both the operating system and hypervisor.</para>
|
||||
with the networking hardware selection and topology.</para>
|
||||
<para>Operating system and hypervisor selection affect the following
|
||||
areas:</para>
|
||||
<variablelist>
|
||||
@ -481,7 +471,7 @@
|
||||
<para>A storage-focused design might require the ability to use
|
||||
Orchestration to launch instances with Block Storage volumes to
|
||||
perform storage-intensive processing.</para>
|
||||
<para>A storage-focused OpenStack design architecture typically uses the
|
||||
<para>A storage-focused OpenStack design architecture uses the
|
||||
following components:</para>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
@ -520,13 +510,6 @@
|
||||
compute-focused architecture design.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="supplemental-software-arch-storage">
|
||||
<title>Supplemental software</title>
|
||||
<para>While OpenStack is a fairly complete collection of software
|
||||
projects for building a platform for cloud services, you may need
|
||||
to add other pieces of software.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="networking-software-arch-storage">
|
||||
<title>Networking software</title>
|
||||
<para>OpenStack Networking (neutron) provides a wide variety of networking
|
||||
@ -591,10 +574,8 @@
|
||||
both alert and automatically attempt to remediate some of the
|
||||
more commonly known issues.</para>
|
||||
<para>If you require any of these software packages, the
|
||||
design must account for the additional resource consumption
|
||||
(CPU, RAM, storage, and network bandwidth for a log
|
||||
aggregation solution, for example). Some other potential
|
||||
design impacts include:</para>
|
||||
design must account for the additional resource consumption.
|
||||
Some other potential design impacts include:</para>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>OS-Hypervisor combination: Ensure that the
|
||||
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>Monitoring of storage resources such as available
|
||||
storage, memory and CPU.</para>
|
||||
storage, memory, and CPU.</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>Monitoring of advanced storage performance data to
|
||||
@ -90,19 +90,6 @@
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="management-efficiency">
|
||||
<title>Management efficiency</title>
|
||||
<para>Operations personnel are often required to replace failed
|
||||
drives or nodes and provide ongoing maintenance of the storage hardware.</para>
|
||||
<para>Provisioning and configuration of new or upgraded storage is
|
||||
another important consideration when it comes to management of
|
||||
resources. The ability to easily deploy, configure, and manage
|
||||
storage hardware results in a solution that is easy to
|
||||
manage. This also makes use of management systems that can
|
||||
automate other pieces of the overall solution. For example,
|
||||
replication, retention, data backup and recovery.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="application-awareness">
|
||||
<title>Application awareness</title>
|
||||
<para>Well-designed applications should be aware of underlying storage
|
||||
@ -122,16 +109,12 @@
|
||||
<title>Fault tolerance and availability</title>
|
||||
<para>Designing for fault tolerance and availability of storage
|
||||
systems in an OpenStack cloud is vastly different when
|
||||
comparing the Block Storage and Object Storage services. The
|
||||
Object Storage service design features consistency and
|
||||
partition tolerance as a function of the application.
|
||||
Therefore, it does not have any reliance on hardware RAID
|
||||
controllers to provide redundancy for physical disks.</para>
|
||||
comparing the Block Storage and Object Storage services.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="block-storage-fault-tolerance-and-availability">
|
||||
<title>Block Storage fault tolerance and availability</title>
|
||||
<para>Block Storage resource nodes are commonly configured
|
||||
with advanced RAID controllers and high performance disks to
|
||||
<para>Configure Block Storage resource nodes with advanced RAID
|
||||
controllers and high performance disks to
|
||||
provide fault tolerance at the hardware level.</para>
|
||||
<para>Deploy high performing storage solutions
|
||||
such as SSD disk drives or flash storage systems for applications
|
||||
@ -257,6 +240,7 @@
|
||||
process, adding capacity and bandwidth to the Object Storage
|
||||
systems is a complex task that requires careful planning and
|
||||
consideration during the design phase.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="scaling-block-storage">
|
||||
<title>Scaling Block Storage</title>
|
||||
<para>You can upgrade Block Storage pools to add storage capacity
|
||||
|
@ -6,9 +6,8 @@
|
||||
xml:id="prescriptive-example-storage-focus">
|
||||
<?dbhtml stop-chunking?>
|
||||
<title>Prescriptive examples</title>
|
||||
<para>Storage-focused architecture depends on
|
||||
specific use cases. This section discusses three
|
||||
example use cases:</para>
|
||||
<para>Storage-focused architecture depends on specific use cases.
|
||||
This section discusses three example use cases:</para>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
|
@ -97,5 +97,4 @@
|
||||
industry standard core. One way of accomplishing this might be
|
||||
through the use of different back ends serving different use
|
||||
cases.</para>
|
||||
<!--I feel like this last para just 'ends'. Is there more information to be put here? A.S -->
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user