From 2f8ccc4ae96d5d15c5d334746568422d06fb590d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Akihiro Motoki Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:13:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [networking] Fix broken directive Change-Id: I8eb29bd634f067826a843c4dc0688b80179bb074 backport: mitaka liberty --- doc/networking-guide/source/scenario-l3ha-ovs.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/networking-guide/source/scenario-l3ha-ovs.rst b/doc/networking-guide/source/scenario-l3ha-ovs.rst index 105b97a1ba..6950a8088c 100644 --- a/doc/networking-guide/source/scenario-l3ha-ovs.rst +++ b/doc/networking-guide/source/scenario-l3ha-ovs.rst @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ of routers on different network nodes to reduce the chances of bandwidth constraints and to improve scaling. Also, this implementation does not address situations where one or more layer-3 agents fail and the underlying virtual networks continue to operate normally. Consider deploying -ref:`scenario-dvr-ovs` to increase performance in addition to redundancy. As -of the Liberty release, you cannot combine the DVR and L3HA mechanisms. +:ref:`scenario-dvr-ovs` to increase performance in addition to redundancy. +As of the Liberty release, you cannot combine the DVR and L3HA mechanisms. .. note::