8df08851d7
Improve some wording and introduce non-breaking spaces. Change-Id: I315968c155f6707b4ae57b00cf96a26b453e1d23 Co-Authored-By: Diane Fleming <diane.fleming@rackspace.com>
81 lines
4.9 KiB
XML
81 lines
4.9 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
|
|
<!DOCTYPE section [
|
|
<!-- Some useful entities borrowed from HTML -->
|
|
<!ENTITY nbsp " ">
|
|
]>
|
|
<section xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
|
|
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
|
|
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
|
|
version="5.0"
|
|
xml:id="section_objectstorage-cluster-architecture">
|
|
<!-- ... Old module003-ch007-swift-cluster-architecture edited, renamed, and stored in doc/common for use by both Cloud Admin and Operator Training Guides... -->
|
|
<title>Cluster architecture</title>
|
|
<section xml:id="section_access-tier">
|
|
<title>Access tier</title>
|
|
<para>Large-scale deployments segment off an access tier, which is considered the Object Storage
|
|
system's central hub. The access tier fields the incoming API requests from clients and
|
|
moves data in and out of the system. This tier consists of front-end load balancers,
|
|
ssl-terminators, and authentication services. It runs the (distributed) brain of the
|
|
Object Storage system: the proxy server processes.</para>
|
|
<figure>
|
|
<title>Object Storage architecture</title>
|
|
<mediaobject>
|
|
<imageobject>
|
|
<imagedata fileref="../common/figures/objectstorage-arch.png"/>
|
|
</imageobject>
|
|
</mediaobject>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
<para>Because access servers are collocated in their own tier, you can scale out read/write
|
|
access regardless of the storage capacity. For example, if a cluster is on the public
|
|
Internet, requires SSL termination, and has a high demand for data access, you can
|
|
provision many access servers. However, if the cluster is on a private network and used
|
|
primarily for archival purposes, you need fewer access servers.</para>
|
|
<para>Since this is an HTTP addressable storage service, you may incorporate a load balancer
|
|
into the access tier.</para>
|
|
<para>Typically, the tier consists of a collection of 1U servers. These machines use a
|
|
moderate amount of RAM and are network I/O intensive. Since these systems field each
|
|
incoming API request, you should provision them with two high-throughput (10GbE)
|
|
interfaces - one for the incoming "front-end" requests and the other for the "back-end"
|
|
access to the object storage nodes to put and fetch data.</para>
|
|
<section xml:id="section_access-tier-considerations">
|
|
<title>Factors to consider</title>
|
|
<para>For most publicly facing deployments as well as private deployments available
|
|
across a wide-reaching corporate network, you use SSL to encrypt traffic to the
|
|
client. SSL adds significant processing load to establish sessions between clients,
|
|
which is why you have to provision more capacity in the access layer. SSL may not be
|
|
required for private deployments on trusted networks.</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</section>
|
|
<section xml:id="section_storage-nodes">
|
|
<title>Storage nodes</title>
|
|
<para>In most configurations, each of the five zones should have an equal amount of storage
|
|
capacity. Storage nodes use a reasonable amount of memory and CPU. Metadata needs to be
|
|
readily available to return objects quickly. The object stores run services not only to
|
|
field incoming requests from the access tier, but to also run replicators, auditors, and
|
|
reapers. You can provision object stores provisioned with single gigabit or 10 gigabit
|
|
network interface depending on the expected workload and desired performance.</para>
|
|
<figure>
|
|
<title>Object Storage (Swift)</title>
|
|
<mediaobject>
|
|
<imageobject>
|
|
<imagedata fileref="../common/figures/objectstorage-nodes.png"/>
|
|
</imageobject>
|
|
</mediaobject>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
<para>Currently, a 2 TB or 3 TB SATA disk delivers
|
|
good performance for the price. You can use desktop-grade
|
|
drives if you have responsive remote hands in the datacenter
|
|
and enterprise-grade drives if you don't.</para>
|
|
<section xml:id="section_storage-nodes-considerations">
|
|
<title>Factors to consider</title>
|
|
<para>You should keep in mind the desired I/O performance for single-threaded requests .
|
|
This system does not use RAID, so a single disk handles each request for an object.
|
|
Disk performance impacts single-threaded response rates.</para>
|
|
<para>To achieve apparent higher throughput, the object storage system is designed to
|
|
handle concurrent uploads/downloads. The network I/O capacity (1GbE, bonded 1GbE
|
|
pair, or 10GbE) should match your desired concurrent throughput needs for reads and
|
|
writes.</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</section>
|