Using assertIsNone(x) instead of assertEqual(None, x)
TrivilalFix Following OpenStack Style Guidelines: [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/#unit-tests-and-assertraises [H203] Unit test assertions tend to give better messages for more specific assertions. As a result, assertIsNone(...) is preferred over assertEqual(None, ...) and assertIs(..., None) Change-Id: I0da4625e916380317959106d3f3dedc70d73f33e
This commit is contained in:
parent
6cf9b1cd68
commit
b684b4dff1
@ -157,8 +157,7 @@ class LinuxSCSITestCase(base.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_find_multipath_device_path_fail(self, exists_mock, sleep_mock):
|
||||
fake_wwn = '1234567890'
|
||||
found_path = self.linuxscsi.find_multipath_device_path(fake_wwn)
|
||||
expected_path = None
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected_path, found_path)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(found_path)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(os.path, 'exists', return_value=False)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(time, 'sleep')
|
||||
|
@ -291,18 +291,14 @@ class BrickLvmTestCase(base.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_thin_pool_provisioned_capacity(self):
|
||||
self.vg.vg_thin_pool = "test-prov-cap-pool-unit"
|
||||
self.vg.vg_name = 'test-prov-cap-vg-unit'
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
None,
|
||||
self.vg.create_thin_pool(name=self.vg.vg_thin_pool))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(self.vg.create_thin_pool(name=self.vg.vg_thin_pool))
|
||||
self.assertEqual("9.50", self.vg.vg_thin_pool_size)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(7.6, self.vg.vg_thin_pool_free_space)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(3.0, self.vg.vg_provisioned_capacity)
|
||||
|
||||
self.vg.vg_thin_pool = "test-prov-cap-pool-no-unit"
|
||||
self.vg.vg_name = 'test-prov-cap-vg-no-unit'
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
None,
|
||||
self.vg.create_thin_pool(name=self.vg.vg_thin_pool))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(self.vg.create_thin_pool(name=self.vg.vg_thin_pool))
|
||||
self.assertEqual("9.50", self.vg.vg_thin_pool_size)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(7.6, self.vg.vg_thin_pool_free_space)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(3.0, self.vg.vg_provisioned_capacity)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user