Fix typo, trigger publishing
Fix some small typos in pbr-semver.rst. Once this patch is published, you will see oslo-specs published at http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs Change-Id: I2e7faa46f4bf90d24c10c6b9aae310fc40b20d02
This commit is contained in:
parent
ace9a43e68
commit
d054115970
|
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Proposed details
|
|||
* Change from tagging versions like 1.2.3a4 (which some projects are using) to
|
||||
tagging them as 1.2.3.0a4 instead, and update the semver docs to specify the
|
||||
leading 0 accordingly. This gets us both PEP440 compatibility (which permits
|
||||
either 1.2.3a4 or 1.2.3.0a4 but not 1.2.3.a4) and conceptual compatability
|
||||
either 1.2.3a4 or 1.2.3.0a4 but not 1.2.3.a4) and conceptual compatibility
|
||||
with semver where the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format is strongly expected to be just
|
||||
numbers, which the 3a4 construct breaks. We need to continue accepting the
|
||||
current format tags since they already exist on our branches - but we can
|
||||
|
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Proposed details
|
|||
* Provide a new command (``tag-release``) to do the git tagging for developers.
|
||||
It will accept parameters allowing manual control, but will enforce semver is
|
||||
being followed (e.g. if there is a newer tag than the version being tagged in
|
||||
the history of the branch, thats an error). Alpha, beta and rc tagging can be
|
||||
the history of the branch, that's an error). Alpha, beta and rc tagging can be
|
||||
automated too.
|
||||
|
||||
* Provide a python API for getting version_info style version data. e.g.::
|
||||
|
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ it is out of scope for now.
|
|||
considered to be the 'last tag' for these rules.
|
||||
|
||||
2. If the last tag is a pre-release tag, then the --no-rc option is consulted.
|
||||
If set, pre-release tags are not considered when looking for for the last
|
||||
If set, pre-release tags are not considered when looking for the last
|
||||
tag.
|
||||
|
||||
3. The highest eligible tag reachable from the commit is considered to be the
|
||||
|
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ Alternatives
|
|||
We could do nothing, but right now folk are reinventing stuff in adhoc fashions
|
||||
and there is no ability to reuse their solutions in a systematic fashion.
|
||||
|
||||
We could put deprecated etc markers in setup.cfg (see previous iterations of
|
||||
We could put deprecated etc. markers in setup.cfg (see previous iterations of
|
||||
this spec in gerrit). This was felt to be too tedious to maintain.
|
||||
|
||||
Impact on Existing APIs
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue