Add leading 0 on alpha release in semver doc

Change-Id: I3c13be99237ff8840f36e21cae684d346defc03d
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Semet <gaetan@xeberon.net>
This commit is contained in:
Gaetan Semet 2018-04-02 11:17:07 +02:00
parent f30aa7a97f
commit 46c56c972b

View File

@ -15,8 +15,13 @@ Changes vs SemVer 2.0
feasible.
#. All versions have been made PEP-440 compatible, because of our deep
roots in Python. Pre-release versions are now separated by . not -, and
use a/b/c rather than alpha/beta etc.
roots in Python:
- Pre-release versions are now separated by . not -, and use a/b/c
rather than alpha/beta etc.
- Alpha version are prefixed by a 0 such as: ``2.0.0.0a1`` instead of
``2.0.0.a1`` for version '2.0.0 alpha 1'. Please note dev version tag
does not have a leading 0, as is ``2.0.0.0a2.dev1``.
Summary
-------
@ -120,7 +125,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in `RFC
version. A pre-release version indicates that
the version is unstable and might not satisfy the intended
compatibility requirements as denoted by its associated normal
version. Examples: 1.0.0.a1, 1.0.0.b99, 1.0.0.c1000.
version. Examples: 1.0.0.0a1, 1.0.0.0b99, 1.0.0.0c1000.
#. A development version MAY be denoted by appending a dot separated
identifier immediately following the patch version.
@ -134,7 +139,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in `RFC
externally facing communication of not-yet-released ideas. Dev versions
are not public artifacts and should never be placed in public
repositories: they are intended as developer-local resources. Examples:
1.0.0.dev1, 1.0.0.a1.dev1
1.0.0.dev1, 1.0.0.0a1.dev1
#. git version metadata MAY be denoted by appending a dot separated
identifier immediately following a development or pre-release version.
@ -142,7 +147,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in `RFC
character git short-sha. The sha MUST NOT be empty. git version
metadata MUST be ignored when determining version precedence. Thus
two versions that differ only in the git version, have the same
precedence. Example: 1.0.0.a1.g95a9beb.
precedence. Example: 1.0.0.0a1.g95a9beb.
#. Build metadata MAY be denoted by appending a plus sign and a series
of dot separated identifiers immediately following the patch or
@ -150,8 +155,8 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in `RFC
alphanumerics [0-9A-Za-z]. Identifiers MUST NOT be empty. Build
metadata MUST be ignored when determining version precedence. Thus
two versions that differ only in the build metadata, have the same
precedence. Examples: 1.0.0.a1+001, 1.0.0+20130313144700,
1.0.0.b1+exp.sha.5114f85.
precedence. Examples: 1.0.0.0a1+001, 1.0.0+20130313144700,
1.0.0.0b1+exp.sha.5114f85.
#. Precedence refers to how versions are compared to each other when
ordered. Precedence MUST be calculated by separating the version
@ -162,16 +167,16 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in `RFC
versions are always compared numerically. Example: 1.0.0 < 2.0.0 <
2.1.0 < 2.1.1. When major, minor, and patch are equal, a pre-release
version has lower precedence than a normal version. Example:
1.0.0.a1 < 1.0.0. When major, minor, patch and pre-release are equal, a
1.0.0.0a1 < 1.0.0. When major, minor, patch and pre-release are equal, a
development version has a lower precedence than a normal version and of a
pre-release version. Example: 1.0.0.dev1 < 1.0.0 and 1.0.0.dev9 <
1.0.0.a1 and 1.0.0.a1 < 1.0.0.a2.dev4. Precedence for two pre-release
1.0.0.0a1 and 1.0.0.0a1 < 1.0.0.0a2.dev4. Precedence for two pre-release
versions with the same major, minor, and patch version MUST be determined
by comparing the identifier to the right of the patch version as follows:
if the alpha portion matches, the numeric portion is compared in
numerical sort order. If the alpha portion does not match, the sort order
is dev < a < b < c. Example: 1.0.0.dev8 < 1.0.0.dev9 < 1.0.0.a1.dev3 <
1.0.0.a1 < 1.0.0.b2 < 1.0.0.c1 < 1.0.0. Precedence for dev versions if
is dev < a < b < c. Example: 1.0.0.dev8 < 1.0.0.dev9 < 1.0.0.0a1.dev3 <
1.0.0.0a1 < 1.0.0.0b2 < 1.0.0.0c1 < 1.0.0. Precedence for dev versions if
all other components are equal is done by comparing their numeric
component. If all other components are not equal, predence is determined
by comparing the other components.