api-ref: Further clarify placement aggregates
Following up on the comments at [1], provide further disambiguation and clarity on the difference between placement aggregates and nova host aggregates, with some illustrative examples that include where the former may be used to represent the latter (as is being proposed via [2]). [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539033/1/placement-api-ref/source/aggregates.inc@14 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/bp/placement-mirror-host-aggregates Change-Id: I53588fca311992f885c4157591232a864b6a86b1
This commit is contained in:
parent
356428d372
commit
42b1aeca58
@ -7,14 +7,19 @@ resource providers in groups called aggregates. API calls in this
|
|||||||
section are used to list and update the aggregates that are associated
|
section are used to list and update the aggregates that are associated
|
||||||
with one resource provider.
|
with one resource provider.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Provider aggregates are used for modeling relationships among providers.
|
||||||
|
Examples may include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* A shared storage pool providing DISK_GB resources to compute node providers
|
||||||
|
that provide VCPU and MEMORY_MB resources.
|
||||||
|
* Affinity/anti-affinity relationships such as physical location, power failure
|
||||||
|
domains, or other reliability/availability constructs.
|
||||||
|
* Groupings of compute host providers *corresponding to* Nova host aggregates
|
||||||
|
or availability zones.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. note:: Placement aggregates are *not* the same as Nova host
|
.. note:: Placement aggregates are *not* the same as Nova host
|
||||||
aggregates and should not be considered equivalent.
|
aggregates and should not be considered equivalent.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Provider aggregates are used for modeling relationships where a provider
|
|
||||||
shares resources with one or more other providers. An example is a shared
|
|
||||||
storage pool providing DISK_GB resources to other compute node providers that
|
|
||||||
provide VCPU and MEMORY_MB resources.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The primary differences between Nova's host aggregates and placement
|
The primary differences between Nova's host aggregates and placement
|
||||||
aggregates are the following:
|
aggregates are the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -37,8 +42,9 @@ aggregates are the following:
|
|||||||
providers are individually decorated with *traits* that provide
|
providers are individually decorated with *traits* that provide
|
||||||
qualitative information about the resource provider.
|
qualitative information about the resource provider.
|
||||||
* In Nova, a host aggregate dictates the *availability zone* within
|
* In Nova, a host aggregate dictates the *availability zone* within
|
||||||
which one or more nova-compute services reside. Placement aggregates
|
which one or more nova-compute services reside. While placement aggregates
|
||||||
have no concept of an availability zone.
|
may be used to *model* availability zones, they have no inherent concept
|
||||||
|
thereof.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. note:: Aggregates API requests are availiable starting from version 1.1.
|
.. note:: Aggregates API requests are availiable starting from version 1.1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user