Merge "Fill in reviewing section of contributing.rst"
This commit is contained in:
commit
e155061242
|
@ -80,6 +80,63 @@ gerrit. Adding ``Task:`` will update the identified task to indicate it is in a
|
|||
Reviewing Code
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
Like other OpenStack projects, Placement uses `gerrit`_ to facilitate peer code
|
||||
review. It is hoped and expected that anyone who would like to commit code to
|
||||
the Placement project will also spend time reviewing code for the sake of the
|
||||
common good. The more people reviewing, the more code that will eventually
|
||||
merge.
|
||||
|
||||
See `How to Review Changes the OpenStack Way`_ for an overview of the review
|
||||
and voting process.
|
||||
|
||||
There is a small group of people within the Placement team called `core
|
||||
reviewers`_. These are people who are empowered to signal (via the ``+2`` vote)
|
||||
that code is of a suitable standard to be merged and is aligned with the
|
||||
current goals of the project. Core reviewers are regularly selected from all
|
||||
active reviewers based on the quantity and quality of their reviews and
|
||||
demonstrated understanding of the Placement code and goals of the project.
|
||||
|
||||
The point of review is to evolve potentially useful code to merged working code
|
||||
that is aligned with the standards of style, testing, and correctness that we
|
||||
share as group. It is not for creating perfect code. Review should always be
|
||||
`constructive`_, encouraging, and friendly. People who contribute code are
|
||||
doing the project a favor, make it feel that way.
|
||||
|
||||
Some guidelines that reviewers and patch submitters should be aware of:
|
||||
|
||||
* It is very important that a new patch set gets some form of review as soon as
|
||||
possible, even if only to say "we've seen this". Latency in the review
|
||||
process has been identified as hugely discouraging for new and experienced
|
||||
contributors alike.
|
||||
* Follow up changes, to fix minor problems identified during review, are
|
||||
encouraged. We want to keep things moving.
|
||||
* As a reviewer, remember that not all patch submitters will know these
|
||||
guidelines. If it seems they don't, point them here and be patient in the
|
||||
meantime.
|
||||
* Gerrit can be good for code review, but is often not a great environment for
|
||||
having a discussion that is struggling to resolve to a decision. Move
|
||||
discussion to the mailing list sooner rather than later. Add a link to the
|
||||
thread in the `list archive`_ to the review.
|
||||
* If the CI system is throwing up random failures in test runs, you should
|
||||
endeavor whenever possible to investigate, not simply ``recheck``. A flakey
|
||||
gate is an indication that OpenStack is not robust and at the root of all
|
||||
this, making OpenStack work well is what we are doing.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Special Considerations For Core Reviewers
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Core reviewers have special powers. With great power comes great responsibility
|
||||
and thus being held to a standard. As a core reviewer, your job is to enable
|
||||
other people to contribute good code. Under ideal conditions it is more
|
||||
important to be reviewing other people's code and bugs and fixing bugs than it
|
||||
is to be writing your own features. Frequently conditions will not be ideal,
|
||||
but strive to enable others.
|
||||
|
||||
When there are open questions that need to be resolved, try to prefer the
|
||||
`openstack-discuss`_ list over IRC so that anyone can be involved according
|
||||
to their own schedules and input from unexpected sources can be available.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Writing Code
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
@ -92,6 +149,10 @@ New Features
|
|||
.. _Project Team Guide: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/
|
||||
.. _Developer's Guide: https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
.. _openstack-discuss: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
|
||||
.. _list archive: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/
|
||||
.. _StoryBoard: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement
|
||||
.. _new bug: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/worklist/580
|
||||
.. _gerrit: http://review.openstack.org/
|
||||
.. _How to Review Changes the OpenStack Way: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/review-the-openstack-way.html
|
||||
.. _core reviewers: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1936,members
|
||||
.. _constructive: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/principles.html#we-value-constructive-peer-review
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue