Make two Trove scenario tests part of the check
This change proposes to move two of the Trove scenario tests that were being run in experimental to the check. These tests pass, but not reliably. The failures are now largely related to timeouts and these are being addressed in[1], other false-negatives which were seen earlier have been now addressed. Since these are now in the check (and no longer experimental) the branches where they will run has been restricted to master, and moving forward, newton, ocata, etc., The stability of the tests in mitaka is not sufficient to make it worthwhile running there, and the tests are not complete in earlier releases. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1571092 Change-Id: I9135544e5c97ad9f129945006cc5b16a70d617e4
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b5e1243c4
commit
c45ee26e81
@ -2246,9 +2246,11 @@ jobs:
|
||||
voting: false
|
||||
|
||||
- name: gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql
|
||||
branch: ^(?!stable/(?:kilo|liberty|mitaka)).*$
|
||||
voting: false
|
||||
|
||||
- name: gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-redis
|
||||
branch: ^(?!stable/(?:kilo|liberty|mitaka)).*$
|
||||
voting: false
|
||||
|
||||
- name: gate-trove-python34-db
|
||||
@ -11586,10 +11588,12 @@ projects:
|
||||
- name: translation-jobs
|
||||
- name: release-notes-jobs
|
||||
check:
|
||||
- gate-trove-tox-checklinks
|
||||
- gate-trove-tox-doc-publish-checkbuild
|
||||
- gate-trove-functional-dsvm-mysql
|
||||
- gate-tempest-dsvm-trove
|
||||
- gate-trove-tox-checklinks
|
||||
- gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-redis
|
||||
- gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql
|
||||
gate:
|
||||
- gate-trove-tox-doc-publish-checkbuild
|
||||
- gate-trove-functional-dsvm-mysql
|
||||
@ -11598,8 +11602,6 @@ projects:
|
||||
- trove-tox-doc-publishdocs
|
||||
- trove-coverage-db
|
||||
experimental:
|
||||
- gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-redis
|
||||
- gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql
|
||||
- gate-grenade-dsvm-trove
|
||||
|
||||
- name: openstack/trove-dashboard
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user