Looking at the git history for git-review, it isn't clear where we are actually using it. Additionally, codesearch.o.o seems to show some projects already managing git-review as a requirement. Ensure everybody is okay with this change by sending a ML post too. Change-Id: I53a45736de74b842c5c01982bb153f04bff5622c Signed-off-by: Paul Belanger <pabelanger@redhat.com>
28 lines
738 B
Bash
Executable File
28 lines
738 B
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/bash
|
|
#
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
# implied.
|
|
#
|
|
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
# limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
# dib-lint: disable=setu setpipefail
|
|
if [ ${DIB_DEBUG_TRACE:-0} -gt 0 ]; then
|
|
set -x
|
|
fi
|
|
set -e
|
|
|
|
packages='tox'
|
|
|
|
for package in $packages ; do
|
|
pip install $package
|
|
done
|