Update patch set 9
Patch Set 9: (1 comment) Patch-set: 9 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 6926 \u003c6926@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_7130\u003e replied on the change"} Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 7130 \u003c7130@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_7130\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
692ca15efd
commit
9ca67dfd5c
|
@ -16,6 +16,24 @@
|
|||
"message": "While I support the idea behind this, new features for tripleo should likely be implemented either in tripleo-ansible, or using init containers or deployment tasks interfaces of tripleo-heat-templates.",
|
||||
"revId": "f60bf4b653d8db09cff0b1449c40079b5dae1db8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "57d0420d_962f25b4",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 9
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 7130
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2023-01-26T13:31:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I don\u0027t disagree here. Should I create a new deployment called \"crypto\" or something like that ? Or I just put this in \"keystone\" ? We\u0027re trying to fix a keystone/ldab issue for customers upgrading from queens to train and the newer RHEL releases with stricter crypto policies breaks their keystone authentication ...",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "296e152f_15d29283",
|
||||
"revId": "f60bf4b653d8db09cff0b1449c40079b5dae1db8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue