From dfdee212cced564201aea00473265c3c694193a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gecong1973 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:02:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add __ne__ built-in function In Python 3 __ne__ by default delegates to __eq__ and inverts the result, but in Python 2 they urge you to define __ne__ when you define __eq__ for it to work properly [1].There are no implied relationships among the comparison operators. The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false. Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected. [1]https://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html#object.__ne__ Change-Id: I6b43b9ac33b4f6e6331b390366e68f2a5bbb997c --- watcherclient/common/apiclient/base.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/watcherclient/common/apiclient/base.py b/watcherclient/common/apiclient/base.py index 9059121..2a4393c 100644 --- a/watcherclient/common/apiclient/base.py +++ b/watcherclient/common/apiclient/base.py @@ -521,6 +521,9 @@ class Resource(object): return self.id == other.id return self._info == other._info + def __ne__(self, other): + return not self.__eq__(other) + def is_loaded(self): return self._loaded