parent
6f3f9681d3
commit
720d9e2ef6
|
@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
|
|||
"message": "lgtm, thanks",
|
||||
"revId": "c42c6e976e789254b297fe472701d581d1a27761",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "e2dbe76e_1f78589c",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 8556
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-04-23T17:05:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "There was a good question from frickler on IRC that whether we should move qa first or at the end. During yoga moving to unmaintained branch we have seen many queries about newly created unmaintained branch not running Ci correctly and that was bcz qa tooling was not moved/modified to unmaintained yet.\n\nI think moving qa at first/in-parallel is good idea. or at least we try and see how it goes.",
|
||||
"revId": "c42c6e976e789254b297fe472701d581d1a27761",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue