openstack/releases
Code Issues Proposed changes
d4036957f1
releases/README.rst
Doug Hellmann 9a49ded73f make release job validation based on project type 
Require puppet repositories to have the puppet jobs and node
repositories to have the node jobs.

Update the allowed values for release-type to include "puppet" and
"nodejs" for folks who want to be explicit, but also use the module
type-detection code to default properly.

Report any jobs that are valid release jobs but for the wrong release
type as errors instead of warnings.

Change-Id: I9330cc62834f42ae0cd4d1cc48ed963846d72944
Signed-off-by: Doug Hellmann <doug@doughellmann.com>
2017-10-23 09:57:38 -04:00

745 lines
26 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Blame History

=======================
Using This Repository
=======================
This repository is for tracking release requests for OpenStack
projects. The releases are managed using groups of "deliverables",
made up of individual project repositories sharing a Launchpad group
and a version number history. Many deliverables will only have one
constituent project.
The repository is managed by the `Release Management team
<https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/release-management.html>`_.
.. image:: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/badges/releases.svg
:target: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/index.html
Defining a Deliverable
======================
A "deliverable" is a unit of distribution of a useful project. It may
be a single library or several server components that are packaged
separately but released and used together. Rather than base the
definition on technical terms such as packaging, we use the social
organization of the project to identify deliverables. If the contents
of two repositories share a bug reporting tool so that bugs for the
contents of both repositories are mixed together and use the same
version numbers for all releases (e.g., one launchpad project), they
are both part of the same deliverable.
Within this repository, each deliverable is represented by a separate
file within the release series directory or the _independent
directory. The data that needs to go into each file is described in
detail below. All automated manipulation of the deliverable is managed
through the data file, which is reviewed by the core team when the
patch is proposed to openstack/releases.
Requesting a Release
====================
The PTL or release liaison for a project may request a release from
master by submitting a patch to this repository, appending the necessary
release metadata to the file describing the deliverable to be
released. The release team will review the request and provide
feedback about the version number.
The stable maintenance team, PTL, or release liaison for a project may
request a release from a stable branch by submitting a patch to this
repository, appending the necessary release metadata to the file
describing the deliverable to be released. The release team will
review the request and provide feedback about the version number. If
the stable release is requested by the stable maintenance team, it
should be acknowledged by the PTL or release liaison to ensure that
the development team is aware of the coming change.
Prepare the release request by submitting a patch to this
repository.
* Always add the new release to the end of the list being edited. The
version numbers will be reordered for display.
* Always pick new version numbers for new releases. We do not update
the contents of previously tagged releases, because that confuses
users who have already downloaded those packages.
* Make sure you follow semantic versioning rules `semver
<http://semver.org/>`_ when picking the version number.
In particular, if there is a change going into this release which
requires a higher minimum version of a dependency, then the
**minor** version should be incremented.
.. note::
The exception to this rule is when the versions of a project are
pinned between minor versions in stable branches. In those cases
we frequently release global-requirements syncs with a patch
version to fix the target branch, e.g. stable/juno, but don't
increment the minor version to avoid it being used in a different
branch, like stable/kilo. Someone from the `stable-maint-core
<https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/530,members>`_ team
should +1 a change like this before it's approved.
* Do not increment version numbers artificially to maintain
consistent versions between deliverables. We expect versions of
compatible deliverables to drift apart over time, and made the
decision to embrace this by using other tools to document for users
which combinations of packages go together.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/065992.html
If two build artifacts always need to have the same version number,
that implies strongly that they are part of the same deliverable
and should not be released separately.
* Start version numbers with 0.1.0 for unstable early editions and
prototypes. Switch to 1.0.0 for the first production-ready
release. Do not release the first version of a deliverable with a
number that matches the version used by other existing related
deliverables. This confuses consumers about the maturity of the new
deliverable and about where they should find "older" versions with
lower numbers, which do not exist.
* Set the first line (summary) of the commit message to the package
name and version being requested.
* If you are not the release liaison or PTL, have the PTL of the
project acknowledge the request with a +1.
* Do not use the "Depends-On" feature of zuul to make a release
request depend on merging another patch in your project. The
dependency management does not work properly in the release check
jobs, and the validator requires that the patch listed in your
deliverable file actually be merged into a proper branch.
* Do not submit multiple dependent patches for multiple
releases. Having a patch series with multiple releases means the
release team cannot properly prioritize processing them. During
milestone weeks, preference is given to milestone
releases. Releases from stable branches, independent projects, and
other types of releases are processed later. If your milestone
release request depends on a request that is deprioritized, you may
miss the deadline.
* RC1 tags and stable branches should be submitted together for
projects using the cycle-with-milestone release model.
Using new-release command
=========================
The releases repository contains several tools to make working with
the data files easier. The new-release command, for example,
calculates new version numbers based on the semantic versioning
information given on the command line and determines the SHA of the
HEAD of the appropriate branch.
Use the ``venv`` tox environment to run the tool, like this:
::
$ tox -e venv -- new-release SERIES DELIVERABLE TYPE
The SERIES value should be the release series, such as "pike".
The DELIVERABLE value should be the deliverable name, such as
"oslo.config" or "cinder".
The TYPE value should be one of:
bugfix -- For a release containing only bug fixes.
feature -- For a release with a new feature, a new dependency, or a
change to the minimum allowed version of a dependency.
major -- For a release with a backwards-incompatible change.
milestone -- For a date-based milestone tag.
rc -- For a release candidate.
new-series automatically includes a stable branch for the first
release candidate.
If the most recent release of cinder during the pike series is
11.0.0.0b3 then running:
::
$ tox -e venv -- new-release pike cinder rc
detects that this is the first release candidate and updates the file
deliverables/pike/cinder.yaml with the new release and a new stable
branch.
If a deliverable includes multiple git repositories, all of the
repositories are included in the new release unless their HEAD version
matches the most recent release from that repository. To re-tag in
those cases, use the --force option.
Use the --stable-branch option to also create a stable branch for the
new release. Projects following the cycle-with-milestones release
model automatically receive a new stable branch on their first release
candidate.
Requesting a Branch
===================
The PTL or release liaison for a project may request a new branch by
submitting a patch to this repository, adding the necessary branch
metadata to the file describing the deliverable to be released. The
release team will review the request and provide feedback about the
branch point and possibly the name.
Prepare the branch request by submitting a patch to this repository.
* RC1 tags and stable branches should be submitted together for
projects using the cycle-with-milestone release model.
* Always add the new branch to the end of the list in the file being
edited.
* Branches should use one of the standard prefixes:
stable/ -- for stable series
feature/ -- for temporary feature branches
driverfixes/ -- for long-term driver maintenance, beyond the end of
the stable branch
* stable/ and driverfixes/ branch names must match a valid series
name.
* If you are not the release liaison or PTL, have the PTL of the
project acknowledge the request with a +1.
* Do not use the "Depends-On" feature of zuul to make a branch
request depend on merging another patch in your project. The
dependency management does not work properly in the release check
jobs, and the validator requires that the patch listed in your
deliverable file actually be merged into a proper branch.
Reviewing a Release or Branch Request
=====================================
Care needs to be taken when reviewing a request such that the version
proposed (1) follows semver rules and (2) will not cause issues between
branches, particularly stable branches (at least stable branches that are not
yet using upper-constraints checking in CI runs, which is anything before
stable/liberty).
General notes when reviewing a request:
* Check the version number for SemVer, especially for libraries.
* Make sure the summary of the patch includes the deliverable name and
version number.
The following rules apply mostly to stable branches and therefore a member of
the `stable-maint-core <https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/530,members>`_
team should +1 the following types of changes before they are approved.
* For libraries, check global-requirements.txt (g-r) in the
`openstack/requirements repo <http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/>`_
to make sure the version you are about to release does not cause a
conflict and wedge the gate. Typically this is only a concern on stable
branches with (un)capped dependencies.
Typical examples of this kind of break (before upper-constraints are used):
#. A stable branch, for example stable/juno, has uncapped dependencies on a
library and a version is released on a newer branch, e.g. stable/kilo,
and that version has updated requirements from global-requirements in
stable/kilo which conflict with the versions of libraries allowed in
stable/juno. This then leads to ContextualVersionConflict failures when
installing packages on stable/juno.
#. Similar to the point above, but if there are overlapping version ranges
between two branches, like stable/juno and stable/kilo, you can have the
same kinds of issues where a release from one branch which has g-r syncs
specific to that branch gets used in the other branch and things break.
We saw this happen with oslo.utils 1.4.1 which was intended for
stable/juno consumption but because stable/kilo g-r allowed that version,
we broke stable/kilo CI jobs since 1.4.1 had juno-level dependencies.
* The rule of thumb is that branches should not overlap versions at the minor
version range. For example, stable/juno can require foo>=1.1,<1.2 and
stable/kilo can require foo>=1.2,<1.3. In this way only patch-level versions
are released for foo on stable/juno and stable/kilo. The pin at the minor
version range prevents those patch-level versions from breaking each other's
branch.
* Ensure that new branches are listed at the end of the branch list in
the file.
Release Approval
================
Releases will only be denied during freeze weeks, periods where there
are known gate issues, or when releasing will introduce unwanted
instability. Releases made late in a week may be delayed until early
in the next week unless there is a pressing need such as a gate
failure or security issue.
Who is Responsible for the Release?
===================================
The release team is responsible for helping to clearly signal the
nature of the changes in the release through good version number
selection.
The project team is responsible for understanding the implications for
consuming projects when a new release is made, and ensuring that
releases do not break other projects. When breaks occur, the project
team is responsible for taking the necessary corrective action.
Deliverable Files
=================
Deliverable repositories for projects using cycle_with_intermediary
or cycle_with_milestones should be placed in their respective releases
within the deliverables directory. Deliverable repositories for
projects using the independent release model should be placed in the
``deliverables/_independent`` directory.
For a deliverable set of projects, we use one YAML file per release
series to hold all of the metadata for all releases and branches of
that deliverable. For each deliverable, we need to track:
* the launchpad project name (such as ``oslo.config``) or storyboard
project id (such as ``760``)
* the series (Kilo, Liberty, etc.)
* the release model being used
* for each repository
* the name (such as ``openstack/oslo.config``)
* the hash of the commit to be tagged
* the version number to use
* highlights for the release notes email (optional)
* the starting points of all branches
We track this metadata for the history of all releases of the
deliverable, so we can render a set of release history documentation.
The file should be named based on the deliverable to be tagged, so
releases for ``liberty`` from the ``openstack/oslo.config``
repository will have a file in ``openstack/releases`` called
``deliverables/liberty/oslo.config.yaml``. Releases of the same
deliverable from the ``stable/kilo`` branch will be described by
``deliverables/kilo/oslo.config.yaml``.
Deliverables File Schema
========================
The top level of a deliverable file is a mapping with keys:
``team``
The name of the team that owns the deliverable, as listed in the
governance repository data files.
``launchpad``
The slug name of the launchpad project, suitable for use in URLs.
(Not needed for projects using storyboard.)
``storyboard``
The ID of the storyboard project, suitable for use in URLs and API
calls. (Not needed for projects using launchpad.)
``release-notes``
The URL or URLs to the published release notes for the deliverable
for the series.
Deliverables contained a single repository should simply include the
URL to the notes for that repository. Deliverables made up of
multiple repositories should use a hash to map each repository name
to its notes URL.
``include-pypi-link``
Either ``yes`` or ``no``, indicating whether the release
announcement should include the link to the package on
PyPI. Defaults to ``no``.
``release-model``
Identify the release model used by the deliverable. See
the reference section of the documentation for descriptions
of the valid models.
``type``
Categorize the deliverable based on what it does. See the reference
section of the documentation for descriptions of the valid
deliverable types.
``artifact-link-mode``
Describe how to link to artifacts produced by the project. The
default is ``tarball`. Valid values are:
tarball
Automatically generates links to version-specific files on
tarballs.openstack.org.
none
Do not link to anything, just show the version number.
``repository-settings``
Mapping of special settings to control the behavior for each repository, keyed
by the repository name.
``flags``
A list of flags attached to the repository.
``no-artifact-build-job``
This repository has no job for building an artifact, but should
be tagged anyway.
``retired``
This repository is no longer used, but was present in old
versions of a deliverable.
``release-type``
This (optional) key sets the level of validation for the versions numbers.
``std``
Default: Enforces 3 digit semver version numbers in releases and allows
for common alpha, beta and dev releases. This should be appropriate for
most OpenStack release requirements.
``xstatic``
Allows a more flexible versioning in line with xstatic package guidelines
and requirements.
``fuel``
The Fuel project manages its own packages.
``puppet``
All puppet modules should use this. If no release-type is
specified and the validation job can determine that a module is a
puppet module, it assumes a release-type of ``puppet``.
``nodejs``
All nodejs modules should use this. If no release-type is
specified and the validation job can determine that a module is a
nodejs module, it assumes a release-type of ``nodejs``.
``releases``
A list of the releases for the deliverable.
``stable-branch-type``
This (optional) key sets the validation for the location associated
with each stable branch.
``std``
Default: Requires stable branches to be created from tagged
releases. This is the correct branch type for most projects.
The location must be either an existing version tag or the most
recently added version number under the releases list (allowing a
tag and branch to be submitted together). All repositories
associated with the version (as identified by the deliverable
file) will be branched from that version using the name given.
``tagless``
This mode requires stable branch locations to be a mapping between
repository name and an existing commit, specified by the
hash. This mode should only be used for projects that do not tag
releases, such as devstack and grenade.
``upstream``
Stable branch names track upstream release names, rather than
OpenStack series names.
``branches``
A list of the branches for the deliverable.
Each ``release`` entry is a mapping with keys:
``version``
The version tag for that release, to be applied to all of the member
projects.
``projects``
A list of all of the projects making up the deliverable for that
release.
``highlights``
An optional message to be included in the release note email
announcing the release. (Use ``|`` to indicate a multi-line,
pre-formatted message.)
Each entry in the ``projects`` list is a mapping with keys:
``repo``
The name of the repository on git.openstack.org.
``hash``
The SHA1 hash for the commit to receive the version tag.
``tarball-base``
An optional name for the base of the tarball created by the
release. If no value is provided, it defaults to the repo base name.
Each entry in the ``branches`` list is a mapping with keys:
``name``
The name of the branch.
``location``
The location value depends on the name.
If a branch name starts with stable/ then the location value depends
on the ``stable-branch-type`` setting.
If a branch name starts with feature/ then the location must be a
mapping between the target repository name and the SHA of a commit
already in the target repository.
If a branch name starts with driverfixes/ then the location must be
a mapping between the target repository name and the SHA of a commit
already in the target repository on the associated stable branch.
Examples
========
For example, one version of
``deliverables/liberty/oslo.config.yaml`` might contain::
---
launchpad: oslo.config
branches:
- name: feature/random-feature-work
location:
openstack/oslo.config: 02a86d2eefeda5144ea8c39657aed24b8b0c9a39
releases:
- version: 1.12.0
projects:
- repo: openstack/oslo.config
hash: 02a86d2eefeda5144ea8c39657aed24b8b0c9a39
and then for the subsequent release it would be updated to contain::
---
launchpad: oslo.config
branches:
- name: feature/random-feature-work
location:
openstack/oslo.config: 02a86d2eefeda5144ea8c39657aed24b8b0c9a39
- name: stable/newton
location: 1.12.1
releases:
- version: 1.12.0
projects:
- repo: openstack/oslo.config
hash: 02a86d2eefeda5144ea8c39657aed24b8b0c9a39
- version: 1.12.1
projects:
- repo: openstack/oslo.config
hash: 0c9113f68285f7b55ca01f0bbb5ce6cddada5023
highlights: |
This release includes the change to stop importing
from the 'oslo' namespace package.
A driverfixes branch might be added to a project in a similar
way. This example shows the branch created in cinder for the newton
series. The branch was created from the HEAD of the stable/newton
branch at the time.
::
---
launchpad: cinder
team: cinder
type: service
release-model: cycle-with-milestones
release-notes: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/cinder/newton.html
branches:
- name: stable/newton
location: 9.0.0.0rc1
- name: driverfixes/newton
location:
openstack/cinder: 08bfc7d817f313451e619b535299121b686d7bd8
releases:
# ...
- version: 9.0.0.0rc1
projects:
- repo: openstack/cinder
hash: 0ba267fbc1836722735102994b466ecd7803b10a
- version: 9.0.0.0rc2
projects:
- repo: openstack/cinder
hash: ab9518112137f3141739e873b19cdc0085963bc7
# ...
- version: 9.1.4
projects:
- repo: openstack/cinder
hash: 908def6bb993798146cccc1621a9cee18950629d
For deliverables with multiple repositories, the list of projects
would contain all of them. For example, the Neutron deliverable might
be described by ``deliverables/mitaka/neutron.yaml`` containing:
::
---
launchpad: neutron
release-notes:
openstack/neutron: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/neutron/mitaka.html
openstack/neutron-lbaas: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/neutron-lbaas/mitaka.html
openstack/neutron-fwaas: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/neutron-fwaas/mitaka.html
openstack/neutron-vpnaas: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/neutron-vpnaas/mitaka.html
releases:
- version: 8.0.0
projects:
- repo: openstack/neutron
hash: 3213eb124e40b130e174ac3a91067e2b196788dd
- repo: openstack/neutron-fwaas
hash: ab5622891e2b1a7631f97471f55ffb9b5235e5ee
- repo: openstack/neutron-lbaas
hash: 19b18f05037dae4bbbada848aae6421da18ab490
- repo: openstack/neutron-vpnaas
hash: a1b12601a64a2359b2224fd4406c5db008484700
To allow tagging for repositories without build artifacts, set the
``no-artifact-build-job`` flag.
::
---
launchpad: astara
repository-settings:
openstack/astara-appliance:
flags:
- no-artifact-build-job
releases:
- version: 9.0.0.0b1
projects:
- repo: openstack/astara-appliance
hash: c21a64ea7b3b0fbdab8592afecdd31d9b8e64a6a
Helpers
=======
In order to help build out these files there are various command line
based tools that come with this repository. To install these it is as
easy as ``pip install .`` in this repository directory.
* ``new-release`` takes arguments to describe a new release and
updates the deliverable file, automatically calculating the version
number
* ``edit-deliverable`` takes arguments to update the contents of a
single deliverable file
* ``list-changes`` that lists the changes in a given release file.
* ``interactive-release`` that goes through a *wizard* style set of
questions to produce a new or updated release of a given project or
set of projects.
* ``missing-releases`` scans deliverable files and verifies that all
of the releases that should have been tagged by hand have been
* ``make-dashboard`` produces a CSV file that can be imported into
Google docs (or any other spreadsheet) for tracking the
milestone-based projects at the end of the cycle
* ``init-series`` initializes a new deliverable directory with stub
files based on the previous release.
tools/aclmanager.py
-------------------
A script to handle pre-release/post-release ACLs on stable/$SERIES
branches.
The 'acls' action helps to produce a patch over
openstack-infra/project-config that inserts a specific ACL for
stable/$SERIES.
The 'groups' action helps to adjust the membership of
$PROJ-release-branch Gerrit group, based on which stage the release
branch is at. At pre-release we remove $PROJ-stable-maint, and add the
$PROJ-release and Release Managers group (pre_release subaction). At
post-release, we remove $PROJ-release and Release Managers, and add
$PROJ-stable-maint (post_release subaction).
Examples:
To create the ACL patch for stable/newton:
::
tox -e aclmanager -- --series newton acls ~/branches/openstack-infra/project-config
To set the pre-release group membership:
::
tox -e aclmanager -- groups pre_release ttx
propose-final-releases
----------------------
Command to edit the deliverable files in a releases repository to
propose final releases. The command modifies files in an existing copy
of the repository and does not invoke git at all, so you need to
create a branch before running it then review the output, commit the
changes, and push the patch to gerrit.
::
tox -e venv -- propose-final-releases newton ocata
propose-library-branches
------------------------
Command to edit the deliverable files in a releases repository to
propose stable branches for libraries. The command modifies files in
an existing copy of the repository and does not invoke git at all, so
you need to create a branch before running it then review the output,
commit the changes, and push the patch to gerrit.
::
tox -e venv -- propose-library-branches
tox -e venv -- propose-library-branches pike
tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh
--------------------------------
Given a branch and one or more repositories, produce a list of the
changes in those repositories since their last tag on that
branch. This is useful for deciding if a project needs to prepare a
release, and for predicting what the next release version should be by
looking at the commit logs.
::
./tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh master openstack/oslo.config
Print the list of changes in ``openstack/oslo.config`` along the
master branch.
::
./tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh stable/kilo $(list-deliverables --repos --team Oslo)
Print the list of changes in the ``stable/kilo`` branch of all Oslo
libraries.
tools/list_library_unreleased_changes.sh
----------------------------------------
Runs list_unreleased_changes.sh for all libraries managed by any
project.
list_stable_unreleased_changes.sh
---------------------------------
Runs list_unreleased_changes.sh with the given branch for all
repositories tagged with ``stable:follows-policy``.
::
./list_stable_unreleased_changes.sh stable/liberty
is equivalent to:
::
./list_unreleased_changes.sh stable/liberty $(list-deliverables --repos --series liberty)
View Git Blame Copy Permalink