be051208e7
For more information about this automatic import see: https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/reviewing-translation-import.html Change-Id: I0b5899aa710c781b1765e750bffc473122a18990 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
source | ||
README.rst |
OpenStack Security Guide documentation
This document provides specific advice from the security
documentation team about contributing to the reStructuredText
version of the OpenStack Security Guide
. It contains the
team's preferences for new patches and bug reports.
For information about the structure of this repository, building the documentation, bug reporting locations, or general contribution notes, please see the security-doc repository documentation.
Reporting bugs
When reporting bugs to the OpenStack Security Guide
, the
team has a preference for scoping the bugs to the chapters in which they
occur, even for bugs which may require a similar change across disparate
sections of the guide. This breakdown gives the team members a clearer
view of the specific bug cases and makes the review process quicker as
the individual reviews tend to be more manageable.
Creating reviews
In a similar style as bug reporting, the security documentation team prefers reviews which are scoped at the chapter level. For example, if proposing a change which will refactor the syntax of a specific element, the change should be submitted on a per-chapter basis.
Reviews should also be scoped to cover a single issue. When possible, please split your reviews based on the bug topics that are being addressed.
General note on consistency
These guidelines may seem overly specific in the terms that they
define, but they have evolved over several cycles of working on the
OpenStack Security Guide
. In general, the team prefers
these stylistic choices as they make the review and improvement process
much smoother. That being said, for very small changes, or in cases
where it would create an excessive amount of noise, the boundaries
defined by these guidelines can be stretched. As always, please use your
best judgment or ask the security documentation team for advice.