|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrage and Mistral Integration
|
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-healing and fast recovery in real world cloud systems is challenging...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Failures happen in real distributed systems
|
|
|
|
|
* A single failure may affect many resources
|
|
|
|
|
* We can see symptoms but it’s hard to find the root cause
|
|
|
|
|
* Recovery might be complicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The integration of Vitrage and Mistral can help identifying the root cause and
|
|
|
|
|
taking corrective actions, in an end-to-end self-healing scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrage is the OpenStack Root Cause Analysis service for organizing, analyzing
|
|
|
|
|
and visualizing OpenStack and external alarms. It is used to provide insights
|
|
|
|
|
about the root cause of problems and deduce their existence before they are
|
|
|
|
|
directly reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mistral is the OpenStack workflow service. It aims to provide a mechanism to
|
|
|
|
|
define tasks and workflows without writing code, manage and execute them in the
|
|
|
|
|
cloud environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Cases
|
|
|
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The integration of Vitrage with Mistral supports two kinds of use cases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Automatic workflow execution, based on predefined conditions
|
|
|
|
|
* Manual workflow execution from Vitrage Entity Graph (WIP in Rocky)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Case 1: NIC failure causes automatic instance migration
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*"As a cloud operator, whenever one of my cloud's compute nodes has a NIC
|
|
|
|
|
failure, I want to be notified of all affected resources including instances
|
|
|
|
|
and applications. Moreover, I want the failed instances to be migrated away to
|
|
|
|
|
another hardware."*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a complex system, a failure in one resource can have a wide effect on other
|
|
|
|
|
resources. One example is a NIC failure, that may cause the host, as well as
|
|
|
|
|
all instances running on it, to become unreachable. This may also affect
|
|
|
|
|
applications that are using these instances and lose their high-availability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To identify the failed resources, the cloud operator can use Vitrage. Vitrage
|
|
|
|
|
will be notified by an external monitor (such as Zabbix) about the failed NIC.
|
|
|
|
|
Based on its cloud topology awareness, Vitrage will raise additional alarms on
|
|
|
|
|
the host, instances and affected applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An affected application will most likely be running in HA mode, so it will
|
|
|
|
|
perform a fail-over to the standby instance. However, it will lose its
|
|
|
|
|
high-availability. In order to fix it, Vitrage can execute a Mistral workflow
|
|
|
|
|
that will migrate the failed instance to a different host, so the application
|
|
|
|
|
will get back to a fully-operational state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: ./vitrage_and_mistral.png
|
|
|
|
|
:scale: 100 %
|
|
|
|
|
:align: center
|
|
|
|
|
:alt: alternate text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Case 2: NIC failure with an optional manual instance migration
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*"As a cloud operator, whenever one of my cloud's compute nodes has a NIC
|
|
|
|
|
failure, I want to be notified of all affected resources including instances
|
|
|
|
|
and applications. I then want an easy way to manually migrate a failed
|
|
|
|
|
instance to another compute and track its state."*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is currently WIP in Rocky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use case is similar to use case 1, but in this use case the cloud operator
|
|
|
|
|
did not pre-configured Vitrage to execute a Mistral workflow when an
|
|
|
|
|
application is affected by an instance being unreachable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of a NIC failure, Vitrage raises alarms on the host, its instances
|
|
|
|
|
and the applications that are using them. The cloud operator can see this
|
|
|
|
|
information in Vitrage Entity Graph, locate a failed instance that affects an
|
|
|
|
|
application, and ask to execute a VM-migration Mistral workflow on that
|
|
|
|
|
instance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Details
|
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrage ``evaluator templates`` define the business logic and the way that
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrage handles alarms and resource states. A template contains ``scenarios``,
|
|
|
|
|
where each scenario is made of ``condition`` and ``actions``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Among other actions (like raise an alarm or modify the state of a resource),
|
|
|
|
|
the cloud operator can ask to execute a Mistral workflow with certain
|
|
|
|
|
parameters. For example, the cloud operator can define this scenario:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``condition:`` an application contains an instance that is unreachable
|
|
|
|
|
* ``action:`` execute a Mistral VM-Migration workflow on that instance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More details about Vitrage template definitions can be found here_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _here: https://docs.openstack.org/vitrage/latest/contributor/vitrage-template-format.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that Vitrage could call Nova evacuate directly for the failed instance,
|
|
|
|
|
but using a Mistral workflow is a much more robust option. Mistral can track
|
|
|
|
|
the Nova evacuation process, check its status and verify that everything worked
|
|
|
|
|
as expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- https://www.openstack.org/videos/sydney-2017/advanced-fault-management-with-vitrage-and-mistral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Vitrage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- https://docs.openstack.org/mistral/latest/
|