stevedore/8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06a...

110 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext

{
"comments": [
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "0d9f379f_41c2da57",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 28522
},
"writtenOn": "2022-09-09T16:16:46Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Thanks for your detailed response",
"revId": "8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06ac0a9156e204f4",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "fc883b6b_22b69b3e",
"filename": "stevedore/extension.py",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 75,
"author": {
"id": 15334
},
"writtenOn": "2022-09-09T15:57:43Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I don\u0027t know if I should be doing this. As things stand, these brackets aren\u0027t currently present on Python 3.10 or 3.9.11, only 3.9.10 or lower. We\u0027re changing behavior here and forcing ourselves to carry this forward forever. However, if we don\u0027t add these then we\u0027ll see different results for Python 3.7 and 3.8 unless we change behavior there also.\n\nI\u0027d be tempted to *not* add this and change the behavior for all Python versions (with a release note and potentially major version bump) but I\u0027d like others opinions.",
"revId": "8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06ac0a9156e204f4",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "21aa3d83_759d4bca",
"filename": "stevedore/extension.py",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 75,
"author": {
"id": 28522
},
"writtenOn": "2022-09-09T16:05:12Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "You propose to change the behavior for all the python versions by abandoning the current solution, or you means that this patch will change the behavior for all Python versions?",
"parentUuid": "fc883b6b_22b69b3e",
"revId": "8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06ac0a9156e204f4",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "32312b15_e4782530",
"filename": "stevedore/extension.py",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 75,
"author": {
"id": 15334
},
"writtenOn": "2022-09-09T16:12:14Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Currently:\n\n Python 3.7.x -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.8.x -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.9.x (x \u003c 11) -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.9.x (x \u003e\u003d 11) -\u003e entry\n Python 3.10.x -\u003e entry\n\nOption A:\n\n Python 3.7.x -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.8.x -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.9.x (x \u003c 11) -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.9.x (x \u003e\u003d 11) -\u003e [entry]\n Python 3.10.x -\u003e [entry]\n\nOption B:\n\n Python 3.7.x -\u003e entry\n Python 3.8.x -\u003e entry\n Python 3.9.x (x \u003c 11) -\u003e entry\n Python 3.9.x (x \u003e\u003d 11) -\u003e entry\n Python 3.10.x -\u003e entry\n\nEither way we\u0027re potentially breaking someone. Question is who.\n\nIf it helps, I can\u0027t find any references to this function via codesearch.o.o. Doesn\u0027t mean someone else isn\u0027t relying on it though...",
"parentUuid": "21aa3d83_759d4bca",
"revId": "8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06ac0a9156e204f4",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "6643c120_7c4b2922",
"filename": "stevedore/extension.py",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 75,
"author": {
"id": 15334
},
"writtenOn": "2022-09-09T16:12:56Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "s/entry/extra/ for all those rows above /o\\ You get the idea",
"parentUuid": "32312b15_e4782530",
"revId": "8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06ac0a9156e204f4",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "e2ffea3d_faaa5643",
"filename": "stevedore/extension.py",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 75,
"author": {
"id": 28522
},
"writtenOn": "2022-09-09T16:16:46Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I see, then I\u0027d suggest to break the oldest versions of Python (3.7, 3.8, 3.9), as the other are the future of our daily usages.",
"parentUuid": "6643c120_7c4b2922",
"revId": "8eb97446db69bc34fee40b5a06ac0a9156e204f4",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
}
]
}