openstack/swift
Code Issues Proposed changes
6a82097b0e
swift/test/unit/obj/test_ssync_receiver.py

2167 lines
92 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
# Copyright (c) 2013 OpenStack Foundation
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
# implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
import contextlib
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
import hashlib
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
import os
import shutil
import tempfile
import unittest
import eventlet
import mock
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
import six
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
from swift.common import bufferedhttp
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
from swift.common import exceptions
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
from swift.common import swob
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
from swift.common.storage_policy import POLICIES, REPL_POLICY
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
from swift.common import utils
from swift.common.swob import HTTPException
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
from swift.obj import diskfile
from swift.obj import server
Make ssync_sender send valid chunked requests The connect method of ssync_sender tells the remote connection that it's going to send a valid HTTP chunked request, but if the remote end needs to respond with an error of any kind sender throws HTTP right out the window, picks up his ball, and closes the socket down hard - much to the surprise of the eventlet.wsgi server who up to this point had been playing along quite nicely with this 'SSYNC' nonsense assuming that everyone here is consenting mature adults. If you're going to make a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" request have the good decency to finish the job with a proper '0\r\n\r\n'. [1] N.B. It might be possible to handle an error status during the initialize_request phase with some sort of 100-continue support, but honestly it's not entirely clear to me when the server isn't going to close the connection if the client is still expected to send the body [2] - further if the error comes later during missing_check or updates we'll for sure want to send the chunk transfer termination line before we close down the socket and this way we cover both. 1. Really, eventlet.wsgi shouldn't be so blasted brittle about this [3] 2. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2005AprJun/0007.html 3. https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/commit/c3ce3eef0b4d0dfdbfb1ec0186d4bb204fb8ecd5 Closes-Bug #1489587 Change-Id: Ic17c6c3075553f8cf6ef6213e62a00282f0d01cf
2015-08-27 18:35:09 -07:00
from swift.obj import ssync_receiver, ssync_sender
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
from swift.obj.reconstructor import ObjectReconstructor
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
from test import unit
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
from test.unit import debug_logger, patch_policies, make_timestamp_iter
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
@unit.patch_policies()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
class TestReceiver(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
utils.HASH_PATH_SUFFIX = 'endcap'
utils.HASH_PATH_PREFIX = 'startcap'
# Not sure why the test.unit stuff isn't taking effect here; so I'm
Fix several typos in the codebase. These were found using https://github.com/intgr/topy Change-Id: I0dc7b76c44b8b17b1dcd79184dad1516fb11173c
2014-04-25 19:54:49 -07:00
# reinforcing it.
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
diskfile.getxattr = unit._getxattr
diskfile.setxattr = unit._setxattr
self.testdir = os.path.join(
tempfile.mkdtemp(), 'tmp_test_ssync_receiver')
utils.mkdirs(os.path.join(self.testdir, 'sda1', 'tmp'))
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.conf = {
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
'devices': self.testdir,
'mount_check': 'false',
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
'replication_one_per_device': 'false',
'log_requests': 'false'}
Exclude local_dev from sync partners on failure If the primary left or right hand partners are down, the next best thing is to validate the rest of the primary nodes. Where the rest should exclude not just the left and right hand partners - but ourself as well. This fixes a accidental noop when partner node is unavailable and another node is missing data. Validation: Add probetests to cover ssync failures for the primary sync_to nodes for sync jobs. Drive-by: Make additional plumbing for the check_mount and check_dir constraints into the remaining daemons. Change-Id: I4d1c047106c242bca85c94b569d98fd59bb255f4
2015-04-17 16:30:30 -07:00
utils.mkdirs(os.path.join(self.testdir, 'device', 'partition'))
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller = server.ObjectController(self.conf)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.controller.bytes_per_sync = 1
self.account1 = 'a'
self.container1 = 'c'
self.object1 = 'o1'
self.name1 = '/' + '/'.join((
self.account1, self.container1, self.object1))
self.hash1 = utils.hash_path(
self.account1, self.container1, self.object1)
self.ts1 = '1372800001.00000'
self.metadata1 = {
'name': self.name1,
'X-Timestamp': self.ts1,
'Content-Length': '0'}
self.account2 = 'a'
self.container2 = 'c'
self.object2 = 'o2'
self.name2 = '/' + '/'.join((
self.account2, self.container2, self.object2))
self.hash2 = utils.hash_path(
self.account2, self.container2, self.object2)
self.ts2 = '1372800002.00000'
self.metadata2 = {
'name': self.name2,
'X-Timestamp': self.ts2,
'Content-Length': '0'}
def tearDown(self):
shutil.rmtree(os.path.dirname(self.testdir))
def body_lines(self, body):
lines = []
for line in body.split('\n'):
line = line.strip()
if line:
lines.append(line)
return lines
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_semaphore_locked(self):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
with mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore') as \
mocked_replication_semaphore:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
mocked_replication_semaphore.acquire.return_value = False
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device/partition', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[":ERROR: 503 '<html><h1>Service Unavailable</h1><p>The "
"server is currently unavailable. Please try again at a "
"later time.</p></html>'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_calls_replication_lock(self):
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
with mock.patch.object(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller._diskfile_router[POLICIES.legacy],
'replication_lock') as mocked_replication_lock:
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mocked_replication_lock.assert_called_once_with('sda1')
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
def test_Receiver_with_default_storage_policy(self):
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
rcvr = ssync_receiver.Receiver(self.controller, req)
body_lines = [chunk.strip() for chunk in rcvr() if chunk.strip()]
self.assertEqual(
body_lines,
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.assertEqual(rcvr.policy, POLICIES[0])
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
def test_Receiver_with_storage_policy_index_header(self):
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
rcvr = ssync_receiver.Receiver(self.controller, req)
body_lines = [chunk.strip() for chunk in rcvr() if chunk.strip()]
self.assertEqual(
body_lines,
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.assertEqual(rcvr.policy, POLICIES[1])
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
self.assertEqual(rcvr.frag_index, None)
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
def test_Receiver_with_bad_storage_policy_index_header(self):
valid_indices = sorted([int(policy) for policy in POLICIES])
bad_index = valid_indices[-1] + 1
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_FRAG_INDEX': '0',
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': bad_index},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
try:
ssync_receiver.Receiver(self.controller, req)
self.fail('Expected HTTPException to be raised.')
except HTTPException as err:
self.assertEqual('503 Service Unavailable', err.status)
self.assertEqual('No policy with index 2', err.body)
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
@unit.patch_policies()
EC Ssync: Update parms to include node and frag indices Previously we sent the ssync backend frag index based on the node index. We need to be more specific for ssync to handle both sync and revert cases so now we send the frag index based on the job contents (as determined by the ec recon)) and the node index as a new header based on, well, the node index. The rcvr can now validate the incoming pair to reject (400) when a primary node is being asked to accept fragments that don't belong to it. Additionally, by having the frag index the rcvr can reject (409) an attempt to accept a fragment when its a handoff and already has one that needs to be reverted. Fixes-bug: #1452619 Change-Id: I8287b274bbbd00903c1975fe49375590af697be4
2015-06-13 11:03:56 -07:00
def test_Receiver_with_only_frag_index_header(self):
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_FRAG_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
rcvr = ssync_receiver.Receiver(self.controller, req)
body_lines = [chunk.strip() for chunk in rcvr() if chunk.strip()]
self.assertEqual(
body_lines,
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(rcvr.policy, POLICIES[1])
self.assertEqual(rcvr.frag_index, 7)
EC Ssync: Update parms to include node and frag indices Previously we sent the ssync backend frag index based on the node index. We need to be more specific for ssync to handle both sync and revert cases so now we send the frag index based on the job contents (as determined by the ec recon)) and the node index as a new header based on, well, the node index. The rcvr can now validate the incoming pair to reject (400) when a primary node is being asked to accept fragments that don't belong to it. Additionally, by having the frag index the rcvr can reject (409) an attempt to accept a fragment when its a handoff and already has one that needs to be reverted. Fixes-bug: #1452619 Change-Id: I8287b274bbbd00903c1975fe49375590af697be4
2015-06-13 11:03:56 -07:00
self.assertEqual(rcvr.node_index, None)
@unit.patch_policies()
def test_Receiver_with_only_node_index_header(self):
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_NODE_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
with self.assertRaises(HTTPException) as e:
ssync_receiver.Receiver(self.controller, req)
self.assertEqual(e.exception.status_int, 400)
# if a node index is included - it *must* be
# the same value of frag index
self.assertEqual(e.exception.body,
'Frag-Index (None) != Node-Index (7)')
@unit.patch_policies()
def test_Receiver_with_matched_indexes(self):
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_NODE_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_FRAG_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
rcvr = ssync_receiver.Receiver(self.controller, req)
body_lines = [chunk.strip() for chunk in rcvr() if chunk.strip()]
self.assertEqual(
body_lines,
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(rcvr.policy, POLICIES[1])
self.assertEqual(rcvr.frag_index, 7)
self.assertEqual(rcvr.node_index, 7)
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
@unit.patch_policies()
def test_Receiver_with_invalid_indexes(self):
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_NODE_INDEX': 'None',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_FRAG_INDEX': 'None',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 400)
EC Ssync: Update parms to include node and frag indices Previously we sent the ssync backend frag index based on the node index. We need to be more specific for ssync to handle both sync and revert cases so now we send the frag index based on the job contents (as determined by the ec recon)) and the node index as a new header based on, well, the node index. The rcvr can now validate the incoming pair to reject (400) when a primary node is being asked to accept fragments that don't belong to it. Additionally, by having the frag index the rcvr can reject (409) an attempt to accept a fragment when its a handoff and already has one that needs to be reverted. Fixes-bug: #1452619 Change-Id: I8287b274bbbd00903c1975fe49375590af697be4
2015-06-13 11:03:56 -07:00
@unit.patch_policies()
def test_Receiver_with_mismatched_indexes(self):
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_NODE_INDEX': '6',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_FRAG_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
self.assertRaises(HTTPException, ssync_receiver.Receiver,
self.controller, req)
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_replication_lock_fail(self):
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
def _mock(path):
with exceptions.ReplicationLockTimeout(0.01, '/somewhere/' + path):
eventlet.sleep(0.05)
with mock.patch.object(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller._diskfile_router[POLICIES.legacy],
'replication_lock', _mock):
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[":ERROR: 0 '0.01 seconds: /somewhere/sda1'"])
self.controller.logger.debug.assert_called_once_with(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'None/sda1/1 SSYNC LOCK TIMEOUT: 0.01 seconds: '
Per device replication_lock New replication_one_per_device (True by default) that restricts incoming REPLICATION requests to one per device, replication_currency allowing. Also has replication_lock_timeout (15 by default) to control how long a request will wait to obtain a replication device lock before giving up. This should be very useful in that you can be assured any concurrent REPLICATION requests are each writing to distinct devices. If you have 100 devices on a server, you can set replication_concurrency to 100 and be confident that, even if 100 replication requests were executing concurrently, they'd each be writing to separate devices. Before, all 100 could end up writing to the same device, bringing it to a horrible crawl. NOTE: This is only for ssync replication. The current default rsync replication still has the potentially horrible behavior. Change-Id: I36e99a3d7e100699c76db6d3a4846514537ff685
2013-11-09 03:18:11 +00:00
'/somewhere/sda1')
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_initial_path(self):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
with mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore') as \
mocked_replication_semaphore:
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
["Invalid path: /device"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 400)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertFalse(mocked_replication_semaphore.acquire.called)
self.assertFalse(mocked_replication_semaphore.release.called)
with mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore') as \
mocked_replication_semaphore:
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device/', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
["Invalid path: /device/"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 400)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertFalse(mocked_replication_semaphore.acquire.called)
self.assertFalse(mocked_replication_semaphore.release.called)
with mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore') as \
mocked_replication_semaphore:
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device/partition', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':ERROR: 0 "Looking for :MISSING_CHECK: START got \'\'"'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mocked_replication_semaphore.acquire.assert_called_once_with(0)
mocked_replication_semaphore.release.assert_called_once_with()
with mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore') as \
mocked_replication_semaphore:
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition/junk',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
["Invalid path: /device/partition/junk"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 400)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertFalse(mocked_replication_semaphore.acquire.called)
self.assertFalse(mocked_replication_semaphore.release.called)
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_mount_check(self):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
with contextlib.nested(
mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore'),
mock.patch.object(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller._diskfile_router[POLICIES.legacy],
'mount_check', False),
Exclude local_dev from sync partners on failure If the primary left or right hand partners are down, the next best thing is to validate the rest of the primary nodes. Where the rest should exclude not just the left and right hand partners - but ourself as well. This fixes a accidental noop when partner node is unavailable and another node is missing data. Validation: Add probetests to cover ssync failures for the primary sync_to nodes for sync jobs. Drive-by: Make additional plumbing for the check_mount and check_dir constraints into the remaining daemons. Change-Id: I4d1c047106c242bca85c94b569d98fd59bb255f4
2015-04-17 16:30:30 -07:00
mock.patch('swift.obj.diskfile.check_mount',
return_value=False)) as (
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
mocked_replication_semaphore,
mocked_mount_check,
mocked_check_mount):
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device/partition', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':ERROR: 0 "Looking for :MISSING_CHECK: START got \'\'"'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(mocked_check_mount.called)
with contextlib.nested(
mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'replication_semaphore'),
mock.patch.object(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller._diskfile_router[POLICIES.legacy],
'mount_check', True),
Exclude local_dev from sync partners on failure If the primary left or right hand partners are down, the next best thing is to validate the rest of the primary nodes. Where the rest should exclude not just the left and right hand partners - but ourself as well. This fixes a accidental noop when partner node is unavailable and another node is missing data. Validation: Add probetests to cover ssync failures for the primary sync_to nodes for sync jobs. Drive-by: Make additional plumbing for the check_mount and check_dir constraints into the remaining daemons. Change-Id: I4d1c047106c242bca85c94b569d98fd59bb255f4
2015-04-17 16:30:30 -07:00
mock.patch('swift.obj.diskfile.check_mount',
return_value=False)) as (
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
mocked_replication_semaphore,
mocked_mount_check,
mocked_check_mount):
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device/partition', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
["<html><h1>Insufficient Storage</h1><p>There "
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
"was not enough space to save the resource. Drive: "
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
"device</p></html>"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 507)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
mocked_check_mount.assert_called_once_with(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller._diskfile_router[POLICIES.legacy].devices,
'device')
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
mocked_check_mount.reset_mock()
mocked_check_mount.return_value = True
req = swob.Request.blank(
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
'/device/partition', environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'})
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':ERROR: 0 "Looking for :MISSING_CHECK: START got \'\'"'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mocked_check_mount.assert_called_once_with(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
self.controller._diskfile_router[POLICIES.legacy].devices,
'device')
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_Exception(self):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
with mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe') as \
mock_shutdown_safe:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\nBad content is here')
req.remote_addr = '1.2.3.4'
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'Got no headers for Bad content is here'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mock_shutdown_safe.assert_called_once_with(
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket)
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket.close.assert_called_once_with()
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'1.2.3.4/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_Exception_Exception(self):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
with mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe') as \
mock_shutdown_safe:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\nBad content is here')
req.remote_addr = mock.MagicMock()
Fix test to work with mock 0.8.0 This particular test case used a construct that worked in mock 1.0, but not in 0.8. Our test-requirements.txt says mock>=0.8.0. Change-Id: I93ed4b7b5d169572bbed6490cb9b0dd421a3b9e2
2013-11-13 12:51:18 -08:00
req.remote_addr.__str__ = mock.Mock(
side_effect=Exception("can't stringify this"))
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mock_shutdown_safe.assert_called_once_with(
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket)
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket.close.assert_called_once_with()
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_MISSING_CHECK_timeout(self):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def readline(self, sizehint=-1):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
line = six.StringIO.readline(self)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
if line.startswith('hash'):
eventlet.sleep(0.1)
return line
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
self.controller.client_timeout = 0.01
with mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe') as \
mock_shutdown_safe:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
'hash ts\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
req.remote_addr = '2.3.4.5'
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[":ERROR: 408 '0.01 seconds: missing_check line'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
Make ssync_receiver drop conn on exc Before, the ssync receiver wouldn't hang up the connection with all errors. Now it will. Hanging up early will ensure the remote end gets a "broken pipe" type error right away instead of it possible sending more data for quite some time before finally reading the error. Change-Id: I2d3d55baaf10f99e7edce7843a7106875752020a
2013-12-06 04:12:15 +00:00
self.assertTrue(mock_shutdown_safe.called)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.controller.logger.error.assert_called_once_with(
'2.3.4.5/sda1/1 TIMEOUT in replication.Receiver: '
'0.01 seconds: missing_check line')
def test_MISSING_CHECK_other_exception(self):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def readline(self, sizehint=-1):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
line = six.StringIO.readline(self)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
if line.startswith('hash'):
raise Exception('test exception')
return line
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
self.controller.client_timeout = 0.01
with mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe') as \
mock_shutdown_safe:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
'hash ts\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
req.remote_addr = '3.4.5.6'
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[":ERROR: 0 'test exception'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
Make ssync_receiver drop conn on exc Before, the ssync receiver wouldn't hang up the connection with all errors. Now it will. Hanging up early will ensure the remote end gets a "broken pipe" type error right away instead of it possible sending more data for quite some time before finally reading the error. Change-Id: I2d3d55baaf10f99e7edce7843a7106875752020a
2013-12-06 04:12:15 +00:00
self.assertTrue(mock_shutdown_safe.called)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'3.4.5.6/sda1/1 EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_MISSING_CHECK_empty_list(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
def test_MISSING_CHECK_have_none(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
self.hash1 + ' ' + self.ts1 + '\r\n' +
self.hash2 + ' ' + self.ts2 + '\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash1 + ' dm',
self.hash2 + ' dm',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
def test_MISSING_CHECK_extra_line_parts(self):
# check that rx tolerates extra parts in missing check lines to
# allow for protocol upgrades
extra_1 = 'extra'
extra_2 = 'multiple extra parts'
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
self.hash1 + ' ' + self.ts1 + ' ' + extra_1 + '\r\n' +
self.hash2 + ' ' + self.ts2 + ' ' + extra_2 + '\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash1 + ' dm',
self.hash2 + ' dm',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def test_MISSING_CHECK_have_one_exact(self):
object_dir = utils.storage_directory(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
os.path.join(self.testdir, 'sda1',
diskfile.get_data_dir(POLICIES[0])),
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'1', self.hash1)
utils.mkdirs(object_dir)
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, self.ts1 + '.data'), 'w+')
fp.write('1')
fp.flush()
self.metadata1['Content-Length'] = '1'
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, self.metadata1)
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
self.hash1 + ' ' + self.ts1 + '\r\n' +
self.hash2 + ' ' + self.ts2 + '\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash2 + ' dm',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
def test_MISSING_CHECK_storage_policy(self):
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
object_dir = utils.storage_directory(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
os.path.join(self.testdir, 'sda1',
diskfile.get_data_dir(POLICIES[1])),
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
'1', self.hash1)
utils.mkdirs(object_dir)
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, self.ts1 + '.data'), 'w+')
fp.write('1')
fp.flush()
self.metadata1['Content-Length'] = '1'
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, self.metadata1)
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
self.hash1 + ' ' + self.ts1 + '\r\n' +
self.hash2 + ' ' + self.ts2 + '\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash2 + ' dm',
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def test_MISSING_CHECK_have_one_newer(self):
object_dir = utils.storage_directory(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
os.path.join(self.testdir, 'sda1',
diskfile.get_data_dir(POLICIES[0])),
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'1', self.hash1)
utils.mkdirs(object_dir)
newer_ts1 = utils.normalize_timestamp(float(self.ts1) + 1)
self.metadata1['X-Timestamp'] = newer_ts1
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, newer_ts1 + '.data'), 'w+')
fp.write('1')
fp.flush()
self.metadata1['Content-Length'] = '1'
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, self.metadata1)
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
self.hash1 + ' ' + self.ts1 + '\r\n' +
self.hash2 + ' ' + self.ts2 + '\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash2 + ' dm',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
def test_MISSING_CHECK_have_newer_meta(self):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
object_dir = utils.storage_directory(
Allow sending object metadata after data This lets the proxy server send object metadata to the object server after the object data. This is necessary for EC, as it allows us to compute the etag of the object in the proxy server and still store it with the object. The wire format is a multipart MIME document. For sanity during a rolling upgrade, the multipart MIME document is only sent to the object server if it indicates, via 100 Continue header, that it knows how to consume it. Example 1 (new proxy, new obj server): proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue X-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes proxy: --MIMEmimeMIMEmime... Example2: (new proxy, old obj server) proxy: PUT /p/a/c/o X-Backend-Obj-Metadata-Footer: yes obj: 100 Continue proxy: <obj body> Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> Change-Id: Id38f7e93e3473f19ff88123ae0501000ed9b2e89
2014-09-16 18:40:41 -07:00
os.path.join(self.testdir, 'sda1',
diskfile.get_data_dir(POLICIES[0])),
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'1', self.hash1)
utils.mkdirs(object_dir)
older_ts1 = utils.normalize_timestamp(float(self.ts1) - 1)
self.metadata1['X-Timestamp'] = older_ts1
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, older_ts1 + '.data'), 'w+')
fp.write('1')
fp.flush()
self.metadata1['Content-Length'] = '1'
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, self.metadata1)
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
# write newer .meta file
metadata = {'name': self.name1, 'X-Timestamp': self.ts2,
'X-Object-Meta-Test': 'test'}
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, self.ts2 + '.meta'), 'w+')
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, metadata)
# receiver has .data at older_ts, .meta at ts2
# sender has .data at ts1
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
self.hash1 + ' ' + self.ts1 + '\r\n'
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
self.hash1 + ' d',
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
def test_MISSING_CHECK_have_older_meta(self):
object_dir = utils.storage_directory(
os.path.join(self.testdir, 'sda1',
diskfile.get_data_dir(POLICIES[0])),
'1', self.hash1)
utils.mkdirs(object_dir)
older_ts1 = utils.normalize_timestamp(float(self.ts1) - 1)
self.metadata1['X-Timestamp'] = older_ts1
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, older_ts1 + '.data'), 'w+')
fp.write('1')
fp.flush()
self.metadata1['Content-Length'] = '1'
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, self.metadata1)
# write .meta file at ts1
metadata = {'name': self.name1, 'X-Timestamp': self.ts1,
'X-Object-Meta-Test': 'test'}
fp = open(os.path.join(object_dir, self.ts1 + '.meta'), 'w+')
diskfile.write_metadata(fp, metadata)
# receiver has .data at older_ts, .meta at ts1
# sender has .data at older_ts, .meta at ts2
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/1',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n' +
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash1 + ' ' + older_ts1 + ' m:30d40\r\n'
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n:UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START',
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.hash1 + ' m',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
def test_UPDATES_timeout(self):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def readline(self, sizehint=-1):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
line = six.StringIO.readline(self)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
if line.startswith('DELETE'):
eventlet.sleep(0.1)
return line
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
self.controller.client_timeout = 0.01
with mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe') as \
mock_shutdown_safe:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.76334\r\n'
'\r\n'
':UPDATES: END\r\n')
req.remote_addr = '2.3.4.5'
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 408 '0.01 seconds: updates line'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mock_shutdown_safe.assert_called_once_with(
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket)
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket.close.assert_called_once_with()
self.controller.logger.error.assert_called_once_with(
'2.3.4.5/device/partition TIMEOUT in replication.Receiver: '
'0.01 seconds: updates line')
def test_UPDATES_other_exception(self):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def readline(self, sizehint=-1):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
line = six.StringIO.readline(self)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
if line.startswith('DELETE'):
raise Exception('test exception')
return line
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
self.controller.client_timeout = 0.01
with mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe') as \
mock_shutdown_safe:
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.76334\r\n'
'\r\n'
':UPDATES: END\r\n')
req.remote_addr = '3.4.5.6'
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'test exception'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
mock_shutdown_safe.assert_called_once_with(
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket)
mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket.close.assert_called_once_with()
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'3.4.5.6/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_no_problems_no_hard_disconnect(self):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _Wrapper(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.mock_socket = mock.MagicMock()
def get_socket(self):
return self.mock_socket
self.controller.client_timeout = 0.01
with contextlib.nested(
mock.patch.object(
ssync_receiver.eventlet.greenio, 'shutdown_safe'),
mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'DELETE',
return_value=swob.HTTPNoContent())) as (
mock_shutdown_safe, mock_delete):
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.76334\r\n'
'\r\n'
':UPDATES: END\r\n')
mock_wsgi_input = _Wrapper(req.body)
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = mock_wsgi_input
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(mock_shutdown_safe.called)
self.assertFalse(mock_wsgi_input.mock_socket.close.called)
def test_UPDATES_bad_subrequest_line(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'bad_subrequest_line\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'need more than 1 value to unpack'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
with mock.patch.object(
self.controller, 'DELETE',
return_value=swob.HTTPNoContent()):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.76334\r\n'
'\r\n'
'bad_subrequest_line2')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'need more than 1 value to unpack'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_no_headers(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'Got no headers for DELETE /a/c/o'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_bad_headers(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'Bad-Header Test\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'need more than 1 value to unpack'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'Good-Header: Test\r\n'
'Bad-Header Test\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'need more than 1 value to unpack'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_bad_content_length(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o\r\n'
'Content-Length: a\r\n\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':ERROR: 0 "invalid literal for int() with base 10: \'a\'"'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_content_length_with_DELETE(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'DELETE subrequest with content-length /a/c/o'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_no_content_length_with_PUT(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o\r\n\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'No content-length sent for PUT /a/c/o'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_early_termination(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'Early termination for PUT /a/c/o'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
def test_UPDATES_failures(self):
@server.public
def _DELETE(request):
if request.path == '/device/partition/a/c/works':
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
return swob.HTTPNoContent()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
else:
return swob.HTTPInternalServerError()
# failures never hit threshold
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'DELETE', _DELETE):
self.controller.replication_failure_threshold = 4
self.controller.replication_failure_ratio = 1.5
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 500 'ERROR: With :UPDATES: 3 failures to 0 "
"successes'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
# failures hit threshold and no successes, so ratio is like infinity
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'DELETE', _DELETE):
self.controller.replication_failure_threshold = 4
self.controller.replication_failure_ratio = 1.5
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
':UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'Too many 4 failures to 0 successes'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
# failures hit threshold and ratio hits 1.33333333333
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'DELETE', _DELETE):
self.controller.replication_failure_threshold = 4
self.controller.replication_failure_ratio = 1.5
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/works\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/works\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/works\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
':UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 500 'ERROR: With :UPDATES: 4 failures to 3 "
"successes'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
# failures hit threshold and ratio hits 2.0
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'DELETE', _DELETE):
self.controller.replication_failure_threshold = 4
self.controller.replication_failure_ratio = 1.5
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/works\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/works\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n\r\n'
':UPDATES: END\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'Too many 4 failures to 2 successes'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
def test_UPDATES_PUT(self):
_PUT_request = [None]
@server.public
def _PUT(request):
_PUT_request[0] = request
request.read_body = request.environ['wsgi.input'].read()
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
return swob.HTTPCreated()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'PUT', _PUT):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n'
Filter Etag key from ssync replication-headers ssync rx sends a header X-Backend-Replication-Headers whose value is a list of headers that the source object has. This list extends the list of allowed headers on the target object server, so that the target object metadata is faithfully reconstructed to match the source. Unfortunately the combination of lower() and title() operations on header keys results in the source 'ETag' value being added to the target metadata under the key 'Etag' in addition to the 'ETag' key that the receiving server adds (note different capitilization), both having the same value. The spurious 'Etag' metadata is potentially confusing for humans inspecting the object metadata and complicates tests that wish to assert the equality of two object metadata dicts. See for example the test in test_ssync_sender.py that this patch cleans up. Furthermore, the possibility of having both Etag and ETag keys has required a workaround in the EC reconstructor [1]. [1] reconstructor fix change id: Ie59ad93a67a7f439c9a84cd9cff31540f97f334a Change-Id: I0c89cf7924a4471bb6d268b5ef3884e2d2cb4286
2015-04-15 16:17:23 +01:00
'Etag: c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b\r\n'
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.12344\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test1: one\r\n'
'Content-Encoding: gzip\r\n'
'Specialty-Header: value\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
pep8 fix: assertEquals -> assertEqual assertEquals is deprecated in py3,changes in dir: *test/unit/obj/* *test/unit/test_locale/* Change-Id: I3dd0c1107165ac529f1cd967363e5cf408a1d02b
2015-08-06 00:55:36 +05:30
self.assertEqual(len(_PUT_request), 1) # sanity
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
req = _PUT_request[0]
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 1)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
Filter Etag key from ssync replication-headers ssync rx sends a header X-Backend-Replication-Headers whose value is a list of headers that the source object has. This list extends the list of allowed headers on the target object server, so that the target object metadata is faithfully reconstructed to match the source. Unfortunately the combination of lower() and title() operations on header keys results in the source 'ETag' value being added to the target metadata under the key 'Etag' in addition to the 'ETag' key that the receiving server adds (note different capitilization), both having the same value. The spurious 'Etag' metadata is potentially confusing for humans inspecting the object metadata and complicates tests that wish to assert the equality of two object metadata dicts. See for example the test in test_ssync_sender.py that this patch cleans up. Furthermore, the possibility of having both Etag and ETag keys has required a workaround in the EC reconstructor [1]. [1] reconstructor fix change id: Ie59ad93a67a7f439c9a84cd9cff31540f97f334a Change-Id: I0c89cf7924a4471bb6d268b5ef3884e2d2cb4286
2015-04-15 16:17:23 +01:00
'Etag': 'c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'Content-Length': '1',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.12344',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Content-Encoding': 'gzip',
'Specialty-Header': 'value',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp x-object-meta-test1 '
'content-encoding specialty-header')})
Filter Etag key from ssync replication-headers ssync rx sends a header X-Backend-Replication-Headers whose value is a list of headers that the source object has. This list extends the list of allowed headers on the target object server, so that the target object metadata is faithfully reconstructed to match the source. Unfortunately the combination of lower() and title() operations on header keys results in the source 'ETag' value being added to the target metadata under the key 'Etag' in addition to the 'ETag' key that the receiving server adds (note different capitilization), both having the same value. The spurious 'Etag' metadata is potentially confusing for humans inspecting the object metadata and complicates tests that wish to assert the equality of two object metadata dicts. See for example the test in test_ssync_sender.py that this patch cleans up. Furthermore, the possibility of having both Etag and ETag keys has required a workaround in the EC reconstructor [1]. [1] reconstructor fix change id: Ie59ad93a67a7f439c9a84cd9cff31540f97f334a Change-Id: I0c89cf7924a4471bb6d268b5ef3884e2d2cb4286
2015-04-15 16:17:23 +01:00
def test_UPDATES_PUT_replication_headers(self):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
# sanity check - regular PUT will not persist Specialty-Header
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/0/a/c/o1', body='1',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'PUT'},
headers={'Content-Length': '1',
'Content-Type': 'text/plain',
'Etag': 'c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.12344',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Content-Encoding': 'gzip',
'Specialty-Header': 'value'})
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 201)
df = self.controller.get_diskfile(
'sda1', '0', 'a', 'c', 'o1', POLICIES.default)
df.open()
self.assertFalse('Specialty-Header' in df.get_metadata())
# an SSYNC request can override PUT header filtering...
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/sda1/0',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o2\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n'
'Content-Type: text/plain\r\n'
'Etag: c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.12344\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test1: one\r\n'
'Content-Encoding: gzip\r\n'
'Specialty-Header: value\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
# verify diskfile has metadata permitted by replication headers
# including Specialty-Header
df = self.controller.get_diskfile(
'sda1', '0', 'a', 'c', 'o2', POLICIES.default)
df.open()
for chunk in df.reader():
self.assertEqual('1', chunk)
expected = {'ETag': 'c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b',
'Content-Length': '1',
'Content-Type': 'text/plain',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.12344',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Content-Encoding': 'gzip',
'Specialty-Header': 'value',
'name': '/a/c/o2'}
actual = df.get_metadata()
self.assertEqual(expected, actual)
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
def test_UPDATES_POST(self):
_POST_request = [None]
@server.public
def _POST(request):
_POST_request[0] = request
return swob.HTTPAccepted()
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'POST', _POST):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'POST /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.12344\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test1: one\r\n'
'Specialty-Header: value\r\n\r\n')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
req = _POST_request[0]
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, None)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.12344',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Specialty-Header': 'value',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'x-timestamp x-object-meta-test1 specialty-header')})
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
def test_UPDATES_with_storage_policy(self):
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
_PUT_request = [None]
@server.public
def _PUT(request):
_PUT_request[0] = request
request.read_body = request.environ['wsgi.input'].read()
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
return swob.HTTPCreated()
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'PUT', _PUT):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '1'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.12344\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test1: one\r\n'
'Content-Encoding: gzip\r\n'
'Specialty-Header: value\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
pep8 fix: assertEquals -> assertEqual assertEquals is deprecated in py3,changes in dir: *test/unit/obj/* *test/unit/test_locale/* Change-Id: I3dd0c1107165ac529f1cd967363e5cf408a1d02b
2015-08-06 00:55:36 +05:30
self.assertEqual(len(_PUT_request), 1) # sanity
Add Storage Policy Support to ssync This patch makes ssync policy aware so that clusters using storage policies and ssync replication will replicate objects in all policies. DocImpact Implements: blueprint storage-policies Change-Id: I64879077676d764c6330e03734fc6665bb26f552
2014-03-18 11:06:52 -07:00
req = _PUT_request[0]
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 1)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '1',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.12344',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Content-Encoding': 'gzip',
'Specialty-Header': 'value',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '1',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp x-object-meta-test1 '
'content-encoding specialty-header')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '1')
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
def test_UPDATES_PUT_with_storage_policy_and_node_index(self):
# update router post policy patch
self.controller._diskfile_router = diskfile.DiskFileRouter(
self.conf, self.controller.logger)
_PUT_request = [None]
@server.public
def _PUT(request):
_PUT_request[0] = request
request.read_body = request.environ['wsgi.input'].read()
return swob.HTTPCreated()
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'PUT', _PUT):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_NODE_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_SSYNC_FRAG_INDEX': '7',
'HTTP_X_BACKEND_STORAGE_POLICY_INDEX': '0'},
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.12344\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test1: one\r\n'
'Content-Encoding: gzip\r\n'
'Specialty-Header: value\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1')
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
pep8 fix: assertEquals -> assertEqual assertEquals is deprecated in py3,changes in dir: *test/unit/obj/* *test/unit/test_locale/* Change-Id: I3dd0c1107165ac529f1cd967363e5cf408a1d02b
2015-08-06 00:55:36 +05:30
self.assertEqual(len(_PUT_request), 1) # sanity
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
req = _PUT_request[0]
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 1)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '1',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.12344',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Content-Encoding': 'gzip',
'Specialty-Header': 'value',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
'X-Backend-Ssync-Frag-Index': '7',
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp x-object-meta-test1 '
'content-encoding specialty-header')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '1')
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def test_UPDATES_DELETE(self):
_DELETE_request = [None]
@server.public
def _DELETE(request):
_DELETE_request[0] = request
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
return swob.HTTPNoContent()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
with mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'DELETE', _DELETE):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.76334\r\n'
'\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
pep8 fix: assertEquals -> assertEqual assertEquals is deprecated in py3,changes in dir: *test/unit/obj/* *test/unit/test_locale/* Change-Id: I3dd0c1107165ac529f1cd967363e5cf408a1d02b
2015-08-06 00:55:36 +05:30
self.assertEqual(len(_DELETE_request), 1) # sanity
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
req = _DELETE_request[0]
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o')
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.76334',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': 'x-timestamp'})
def test_UPDATES_BONK(self):
_BONK_request = [None]
@server.public
def _BONK(request):
_BONK_request[0] = request
return swob.HTTPOk()
self.controller.BONK = _BONK
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'BONK /a/c/o\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.76334\r\n'
'\r\n')
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 0 'Invalid subrequest method BONK'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.controller.logger.exception.assert_called_once_with(
'None/device/partition EXCEPTION in replication.Receiver')
pep8 fix: assertEquals -> assertEqual assertEquals is deprecated in py3,changes in dir: *test/unit/obj/* *test/unit/test_locale/* Change-Id: I3dd0c1107165ac529f1cd967363e5cf408a1d02b
2015-08-06 00:55:36 +05:30
self.assertEqual(len(_BONK_request), 1) # sanity
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(_BONK_request[0], None)
def test_UPDATES_multiple(self):
_requests = []
@server.public
def _PUT(request):
_requests.append(request)
request.read_body = request.environ['wsgi.input'].read()
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
return swob.HTTPCreated()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
@server.public
def _POST(request):
_requests.append(request)
return swob.HTTPOk()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
@server.public
def _DELETE(request):
_requests.append(request)
Add one more test for ssync_receiver To prevent 409 conflict on a primary node during ssyncing, ssync-receiver should add x-ssync-backend-frag-index generated from x-ssync-backend-node-index of the SSYNC replication request header. The change is done by previous work[1], but we need more test for that. This patch addes one more assertion if the x-ssync-backend-frag-index is in the ssync subrequest correctly. *BONUS* Fix some weird mock and add some sanities. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191521/ Change-Id: I27aff713c69017c0bc4c60b4833184e1285595d7
2015-06-22 23:24:19 -07:00
return swob.HTTPNoContent()
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
with contextlib.nested(
mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'PUT', _PUT),
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'POST', _POST),
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
mock.patch.object(self.controller, 'DELETE', _DELETE)):
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o1\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00001\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test1: one\r\n'
'Content-Encoding: gzip\r\n'
'Specialty-Header: value\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1'
'DELETE /a/c/o2\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00002\r\n'
'\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o3\r\n'
'Content-Length: 3\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00003\r\n'
'\r\n'
'123'
'PUT /a/c/o4\r\n'
'Content-Length: 4\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00004\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1\r\n4'
'DELETE /a/c/o5\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00005\r\n'
'\r\n'
'DELETE /a/c/o6\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00006\r\n'
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
'\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o7\r\n'
'Content-Length: 7\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00007\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1234567'
'POST /a/c/o7\r\n'
'X-Object-Meta-Test-User: user_meta\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00008\r\n'
'\r\n'
)
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
':UPDATES: START', ':UPDATES: END'])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
self.assertEqual(len(_requests), 8) # sanity
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'PUT')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o1')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 1)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '1',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00001',
'X-Object-Meta-Test1': 'one',
'Content-Encoding': 'gzip',
'Specialty-Header': 'value',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp x-object-meta-test1 '
'content-encoding specialty-header')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '1')
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'DELETE')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o2')
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00002',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': 'x-timestamp'})
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'PUT')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o3')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 3)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '3',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00003',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '123')
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'PUT')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o4')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 4)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '4',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00004',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '1\r\n4')
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'DELETE')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o5')
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00005',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': 'x-timestamp'})
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'DELETE')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o6')
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00006',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': 'x-timestamp'})
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'PUT')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o7')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 7)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '7',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00007',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '1234567')
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.method, 'POST')
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o7')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, None)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00008',
'X-Object-Meta-Test-User': 'user_meta',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'x-object-meta-test-user x-timestamp')})
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(_requests, [])
def test_UPDATES_subreq_does_not_read_all(self):
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
# This tests that if a SSYNC subrequest fails and doesn't read
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
# all the subrequest body that it will read and throw away the rest of
# the body before moving on to the next subrequest.
# If you comment out the part in ssync_receiver where it does:
# for junk in subreq.environ['wsgi.input']:
# pass
# You can then see this test fail.
_requests = []
@server.public
def _PUT(request):
_requests.append(request)
# Deliberately just reading up to first 2 bytes.
request.read_body = request.environ['wsgi.input'].read(2)
return swob.HTTPInternalServerError()
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
class _IgnoreReadlineHint(six.StringIO):
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def __init__(self, value):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
six.StringIO.__init__(self, value)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
def readline(self, hint=-1):
Get StringIO and cStringIO from six.moves * replace "from cStringIO import StringIO" with "from six.moves import cStringIO as StringIO" * replace "from StringIO import StringIO" with "from six import StringIO" * replace "import cStringIO" and "cStringIO.StringIO()" with "from six import moves" and "moves.cStringIO()" * replace "import StringIO" and "StringIO.StringIO()" with "import six" and "six.StringIO()" This patch was generated by the stringio operation of the sixer tool: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sixer Change-Id: Iacba77fec3045f96773d1090c0bd48613729a561
2015-05-27 17:27:47 +02:00
return six.StringIO.readline(self)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.controller.PUT = _PUT
self.controller.network_chunk_size = 2
self.controller.logger = mock.MagicMock()
req = swob.Request.blank(
'/device/partition',
Erasure Code Reconstructor This patch adds the erasure code reconstructor. It follows the design of the replicator but: - There is no notion of update() or update_deleted(). - There is a single job processor - Jobs are processed partition by partition. - At the end of processing a rebalanced or handoff partition, the reconstructor will remove successfully reverted objects if any. And various ssync changes such as the addition of reconstruct_fa() function called from ssync_sender which performs the actual reconstruction while sending the object to the receiver Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Co-Authored-By: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: John Dickinson <me@not.mn> Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com> Co-Authored-By: Samuel Merritt <sam@swiftstack.com> Co-Authored-By: Christian Schwede <christian.schwede@enovance.com> Co-Authored-By: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com> blueprint ec-reconstructor Change-Id: I7d15620dc66ee646b223bb9fff700796cd6bef51
2014-10-28 09:51:06 -07:00
environ={'REQUEST_METHOD': 'SSYNC'},
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
body=':MISSING_CHECK: START\r\n:MISSING_CHECK: END\r\n'
':UPDATES: START\r\n'
'PUT /a/c/o1\r\n'
'Content-Length: 3\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00001\r\n'
'\r\n'
'123'
'PUT /a/c/o2\r\n'
'Content-Length: 1\r\n'
'X-Timestamp: 1364456113.00002\r\n'
'\r\n'
'1')
req.environ['wsgi.input'] = _IgnoreReadlineHint(req.body)
update ssync tests to use req.get_response() Change-Id: I2fa752b42669fab27d1a8e7562d52d8f8b848351
2013-12-16 12:33:08 -08:00
resp = req.get_response(self.controller)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
self.assertEqual(
self.body_lines(resp.body),
[':MISSING_CHECK: START', ':MISSING_CHECK: END',
":ERROR: 500 'ERROR: With :UPDATES: 2 failures to 0 successes'"])
self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 200)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.exception.called)
self.assertFalse(self.controller.logger.error.called)
pep8 fix: assertEquals -> assertEqual assertEquals is deprecated in py3,changes in dir: *test/unit/obj/* *test/unit/test_locale/* Change-Id: I3dd0c1107165ac529f1cd967363e5cf408a1d02b
2015-08-06 00:55:36 +05:30
self.assertEqual(len(_requests), 2) # sanity
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o1')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 3)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '3',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00001',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '12')
req = _requests.pop(0)
self.assertEqual(req.path, '/device/partition/a/c/o2')
self.assertEqual(req.content_length, 1)
self.assertEqual(req.headers, {
'Content-Length': '1',
'X-Timestamp': '1364456113.00002',
'Host': 'localhost:80',
Replace POLICY and POLICY_INDEX with string literals Replaced throughout code base & tox'd. Functional as well as probe tests pass with and without policies defined. POLICY --> 'X-Storage-Policy' POLICY_INDEX --> 'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index' Change-Id: Iea3d06de80210e9e504e296d4572583d7ffabeac
2014-06-23 12:52:50 -07:00
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': '0',
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
'X-Backend-Replication': 'True',
'X-Backend-Replication-Headers': (
'content-length x-timestamp')})
self.assertEqual(req.read_body, '1')
self.assertEqual(_requests, [])
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
@patch_policies(with_ec_default=True)
class TestSsyncRxServer(unittest.TestCase):
# Tests to verify behavior of SSYNC requests sent to an object
# server socket.
def setUp(self):
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
self.ts = unit.make_timestamp_iter()
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
self.rx_ip = '127.0.0.1'
# dirs
self.tmpdir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
self.tempdir = os.path.join(self.tmpdir, 'tmp_test_obj_server')
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
self.rx_devices = os.path.join(self.tempdir, 'rx/node')
self.tx_devices = os.path.join(self.tempdir, 'tx/node')
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
for device in ('sda1', 'sdb1'):
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
for root in (self.rx_devices, self.tx_devices):
os.makedirs(os.path.join(root, device))
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
self.conf = {
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
'devices': self.rx_devices,
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
'swift_dir': self.tempdir,
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
'mount_check': False,
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
}
self.rx_logger = debug_logger('test-object-server')
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
self.rx_app = server.ObjectController(self.conf, logger=self.rx_logger)
self.sock = eventlet.listen((self.rx_ip, 0))
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
self.rx_server = eventlet.spawn(
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
eventlet.wsgi.server, self.sock, self.rx_app, utils.NullLogger())
self.rx_port = self.sock.getsockname()[1]
self.tx_logger = debug_logger('test-daemon')
self.policy = POLICIES[0]
self.conf['devices'] = self.tx_devices
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
self.daemon = ObjectReconstructor(self.conf, self.tx_logger)
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
self.daemon._diskfile_mgr = self.daemon._df_router[self.policy]
self.nodes = [
{
'device': 'sda1',
'ip': '127.0.0.1',
'replication_ip': '127.0.0.1',
'port': self.rx_port,
'replication_port': self.rx_port,
},
{
'device': 'sdb1',
'ip': '127.0.0.1',
'replication_ip': '127.0.0.1',
'port': self.rx_port,
'replication_port': self.rx_port,
},
]
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
def tearDown(self):
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
self.rx_server.kill()
self.sock.close()
eventlet.sleep(0)
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
shutil.rmtree(self.tmpdir)
Make ssync_sender send valid chunked requests The connect method of ssync_sender tells the remote connection that it's going to send a valid HTTP chunked request, but if the remote end needs to respond with an error of any kind sender throws HTTP right out the window, picks up his ball, and closes the socket down hard - much to the surprise of the eventlet.wsgi server who up to this point had been playing along quite nicely with this 'SSYNC' nonsense assuming that everyone here is consenting mature adults. If you're going to make a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" request have the good decency to finish the job with a proper '0\r\n\r\n'. [1] N.B. It might be possible to handle an error status during the initialize_request phase with some sort of 100-continue support, but honestly it's not entirely clear to me when the server isn't going to close the connection if the client is still expected to send the body [2] - further if the error comes later during missing_check or updates we'll for sure want to send the chunk transfer termination line before we close down the socket and this way we cover both. 1. Really, eventlet.wsgi shouldn't be so blasted brittle about this [3] 2. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2005AprJun/0007.html 3. https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/commit/c3ce3eef0b4d0dfdbfb1ec0186d4bb204fb8ecd5 Closes-Bug #1489587 Change-Id: Ic17c6c3075553f8cf6ef6213e62a00282f0d01cf
2015-08-27 18:35:09 -07:00
def test_SSYNC_disconnect(self):
node = {
'replication_ip': '127.0.0.1',
'replication_port': self.rx_port,
'device': 'sdb1',
}
job = {
'partition': 0,
'policy': POLICIES[0],
'device': 'sdb1',
}
sender = ssync_sender.Sender(self.daemon, node, job, ['abc'])
# kick off the sender and let the error trigger failure
with mock.patch('swift.obj.ssync_receiver.Receiver.initialize_request')\
as mock_initialize_request:
mock_initialize_request.side_effect = \
swob.HTTPInternalServerError()
success, _ = sender()
self.assertFalse(success)
stderr = six.StringIO()
with mock.patch('sys.stderr', stderr):
# let gc and eventlet spin a bit
del sender
for i in range(3):
eventlet.sleep(0)
self.assertNotIn('ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16',
stderr.getvalue())
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
def test_SSYNC_device_not_available(self):
with mock.patch('swift.obj.ssync_receiver.Receiver.missing_check')\
as mock_missing_check:
self.connection = bufferedhttp.BufferedHTTPConnection(
'127.0.0.1:%s' % self.rx_port)
self.connection.putrequest('SSYNC', '/sdc1/0')
self.connection.putheader('Transfer-Encoding', 'chunked')
self.connection.putheader('X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index',
int(POLICIES[0]))
self.connection.endheaders()
resp = self.connection.getresponse()
self.assertEqual(507, resp.status)
resp.read()
resp.close()
# sanity check that the receiver did not proceed to missing_check
self.assertFalse(mock_missing_check.called)
def test_SSYNC_invalid_policy(self):
valid_indices = sorted([int(policy) for policy in POLICIES])
bad_index = valid_indices[-1] + 1
with mock.patch('swift.obj.ssync_receiver.Receiver.missing_check')\
as mock_missing_check:
self.connection = bufferedhttp.BufferedHTTPConnection(
'127.0.0.1:%s' % self.rx_port)
self.connection.putrequest('SSYNC', '/sda1/0')
self.connection.putheader('Transfer-Encoding', 'chunked')
self.connection.putheader('X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index',
bad_index)
self.connection.endheaders()
resp = self.connection.getresponse()
self.assertEqual(503, resp.status)
resp.read()
resp.close()
# sanity check that the receiver did not proceed to missing_check
self.assertFalse(mock_missing_check.called)
Fix invalid frag_index header in ssync_sender when reverting EC tombstones Back in d124ce [1] we failed to recognize the situation where a revert job would have an explicit frag_index key wth the literal value None which would take precedence over the dict.get's default value of ''. Later in ssync_receiver we'd bump into the ValueError converting 'None' to an int (again). In ssync_sender we now handle literal None's correctly and should hopefully no longer put this invalid headers on the wire - but for belts and braces we'll also update ssync_receiver to raise a 400 series error and ssync_sender to better log the error messages. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195457/ Co-Author: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Co-Author: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hp.com> Change-Id: Ic71ba7cc82487773214030207bb193f425319449 Closes-Bug: 1489546
2015-08-27 11:02:27 -07:00
def test_sender_job_missing_frag_node_indexes(self):
# replication jobs don't send frag_index, so we'll use a REPL_POLICY
repl_policy = POLICIES[1]
self.assertEqual(repl_policy.policy_type, REPL_POLICY)
repl_mgr = self.daemon._df_router[repl_policy]
self.daemon._diskfile_mgr = repl_mgr
device = self.nodes[0]['device']
# create a replicated object, on sender
df = repl_mgr.get_diskfile(device, '0', 'a', 'c', 'o',
policy=repl_policy)
now = next(self.ts)
metadata = {
'X-Timestamp': now.internal,
'Content-Type': 'text/plain',
'Content-Length': '0',
'ETag': hashlib.md5('').hexdigest(),
}
with df.create() as writer:
writer.write('')
writer.put(metadata)
# sanity the object is on the sender
self.assertTrue(df._datadir.startswith(self.tx_devices))
# setup a ssync job
suffix = os.path.basename(os.path.dirname(df._datadir))
job = {
'partition': 0,
'policy': repl_policy,
'device': device,
}
sender = ssync_sender.Sender(
self.daemon, self.nodes[0], job, [suffix])
success, _ = sender()
self.assertTrue(success)
# sanity object is synced to receiver
remote_df = self.rx_app._diskfile_router[repl_policy].get_diskfile(
device, '0', 'a', 'c', 'o', policy=repl_policy)
self.assertTrue(remote_df._datadir.startswith(self.rx_devices))
self.assertEqual(remote_df.read_metadata(), metadata)
def test_send_frag_index_none(self):
# create an ec fragment on the remote node
device = self.nodes[1]['device']
remote_df = self.rx_app._diskfile_router[self.policy].get_diskfile(
device, '1', 'a', 'c', 'o', policy=self.policy)
ts1 = next(self.ts)
data = 'frag_archive'
metadata = {
'ETag': hashlib.md5(data).hexdigest(),
'X-Timestamp': ts1.internal,
'Content-Length': len(data),
'X-Object-Sysmeta-Ec-Frag-Index': '3',
}
with remote_df.create() as writer:
writer.write(data)
writer.put(metadata)
writer.commit(ts1)
# create a tombstone on the local node
df = self.daemon._df_router[self.policy].get_diskfile(
device, '1', 'a', 'c', 'o', policy=self.policy)
suffix = os.path.basename(os.path.dirname(df._datadir))
ts2 = next(self.ts)
df.delete(ts2)
# a reconstructor revert job with only tombstones will have frag_index
# explicitly set to None
job = {
'frag_index': None,
'partition': 1,
'policy': self.policy,
'device': device,
}
sender = ssync_sender.Sender(
self.daemon, self.nodes[1], job, [suffix])
success, _ = sender()
self.assertTrue(success)
# diskfile tombstone synced to receiver's datadir with timestamp
self.assertTrue(remote_df._datadir.startswith(self.rx_devices))
try:
remote_df.read_metadata()
except exceptions.DiskFileDeleted as e:
self.assertEqual(e.timestamp, ts2)
else:
self.fail('Successfully opened remote DiskFile')
def test_bad_request_invalid_frag_index(self):
with mock.patch('swift.obj.ssync_receiver.Receiver.missing_check')\
as mock_missing_check:
self.connection = bufferedhttp.BufferedHTTPConnection(
'127.0.0.1:%s' % self.rx_port)
self.connection.putrequest('SSYNC', '/sda1/0')
self.connection.putheader('Transfer-Encoding', 'chunked')
self.connection.putheader('X-Backend-Ssync-Frag-Index',
'None')
self.connection.endheaders()
resp = self.connection.getresponse()
self.assertEqual(400, resp.status)
error_msg = resp.read()
self.assertIn("Invalid X-Backend-Ssync-Frag-Index 'None'", error_msg)
resp.close()
# sanity check that the receiver did not proceed to missing_check
self.assertFalse(mock_missing_check.called)
Make SSYNC receiver return a reponse when initial checks fail The ssync Receiver performs some checks on request parameters in initialize_request() before starting the exchange of missing hashes and updates e.g. the destination device must be available; the policy must be valid. Currently if any of these checks fails then the receiver just closes the connection, so the Sender gets no useful response code and noise is generated in logs by httplib and wsgi Exceptions. This change moves the request parameter checks to the Receiver constructor so that the HTTPExceptions raised are actually sent as responses. (The 'connection close' exception handling still applies once the 'missing_check' and 'updates' handshakes are in progress.) Moving initialize_request() revealed the following lurking bug: * initialize_request() sets req.environ['eventlet.minimum_write_chunk_size'] = 0 * this was previously ineffective because the Response environ had already been copied from Request environ before this value was set, so the Response never used the value :/ * Now that it is effective (a good thing) it causes the empty string yielded by the receiver when there are no missing hashes in missing_checks() to be sent to the sender immediately. This makes the Sender.readline() think there has been an early disconnect and raise an Exception (a bad thing), as revealed by test/unit/obj/test_ssync_sender.py:TestSsync.test_nothing_to_sync The fix for this is to simply make the receiver skip sending the empty string if there are no missing object_hashes. Change-Id: I036a6919fead6e970505dccbb0da7bfbdf8cecc3
2015-04-27 09:17:46 +01:00
Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files ssync currently does the wrong thing when replicating object dirs containing both a .data and a .meta file. The ssync sender uses a single PUT to send both object content and metadata to the receiver, using the metadata (.meta file) timestamp. This results in the object content timestamp being advanced to the metadata timestamp, potentially overwriting newer object data on the receiver and causing an inconsistency with the container server record for the object. For example, replicating an object dir with {t0.data(etag=x), t2.meta} to a receiver with t1.data(etag=y) will result in the creation of t2.data(etag=x) on the receiver. However, the container server will continue to list the object as t1(etag=y). This patch modifies ssync to replicate the content of .data and .meta separately using a PUT request for the data (no change) and a POST request for the metadata. In effect, ssync replication replicates the client operations that generated the .data and .meta files so that the result of replication is the same as if the original client requests had persisted on all object servers. Apart from maintaining correct timestamps across sync'd nodes, this has the added benefit of not needing to PUT objects when only the metadata has changed and a POST will suffice. Taking the same example, ssync sender will no longer PUT t0.data but will POST t2.meta resulting in the receiver having t1.data and t2.meta. The changes are backwards compatible: an upgraded sender will only sync data files to a legacy receiver and will not sync meta files (fixing the erroneous behavior described above); a legacy sender will operate as before when sync'ing to an upgraded receiver. Changes: - diskfile API provides methods to get the data file timestamp as distinct from the diskfile timestamp. - diskfile yield_hashes return tuple now passes a dict mapping data and meta (if any) timestamps to their respective values in the timestamp field. - ssync_sender will encode data and meta timestamps in the (hash_path, timestamp) tuple sent to the receiver during missing_checks. - ssync_receiver compares sender's data and meta timestamps to any local diskfile and may specify that only data or meta parts are sent during updates phase by appending a qualifier to the hash returned in its 'wanted' list. - ssync_sender now sends POST subrequests when a meta file exists and its content needs to be replicated. - ssync_sender may send *only* a POST if the receiver indicates that is the only part required to be sync'd. - object server will allow PUT and DELETE with earlier timestamp than a POST - Fixed TODO related to replicated objects with fast-POST and ssync Related spec change-id: I60688efc3df692d3a39557114dca8c5490f7837e Co-Authored-By: Clay Gerrard <clay.gerrard@gmail.com> Closes-Bug: 1501528 Change-Id: I97552d194e5cc342b0a3f4b9800de8aa6b9cb85b
2015-04-22 12:56:50 +01:00
class TestModuleMethods(unittest.TestCase):
def test_decode_missing(self):
object_hash = '9d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf0abc'
ts_iter = make_timestamp_iter()
t_data = ts_iter.next()
t_meta = ts_iter.next()
d_meta_data = t_meta.raw - t_data.raw
# legacy single timestamp string
msg = '%s %s' % (object_hash, t_data.internal)
expected = dict(object_hash=object_hash,
ts_meta=t_data,
ts_data=t_data)
self.assertEqual(expected, ssync_receiver.decode_missing(msg))
# hex meta delta encoded as extra message part
msg = '%s %s m:%x' % (object_hash, t_data.internal, d_meta_data)
expected = dict(object_hash=object_hash,
ts_data=t_data,
ts_meta=t_meta)
self.assertEqual(expected, ssync_receiver.decode_missing(msg))
# unexpected zero delta is tolerated
msg = '%s %s m:0' % (object_hash, t_data.internal)
expected = dict(object_hash=object_hash,
ts_meta=t_data,
ts_data=t_data)
self.assertEqual(expected, ssync_receiver.decode_missing(msg))
# unexpected subparts in timestamp delta part are tolerated
msg = '%s %s c:12345,m:%x,junk' % (object_hash,
t_data.internal,
d_meta_data)
expected = dict(object_hash=object_hash,
ts_meta=t_meta,
ts_data=t_data)
self.assertEqual(
expected, ssync_receiver.decode_missing(msg))
# extra message parts tolerated
msg = '%s %s m:%x future parts' % (object_hash,
t_data.internal,
d_meta_data)
expected = dict(object_hash=object_hash,
ts_meta=t_meta,
ts_data=t_data)
self.assertEqual(expected, ssync_receiver.decode_missing(msg))
def test_encode_wanted(self):
ts_iter = make_timestamp_iter()
old_t_data = ts_iter.next()
t_data = ts_iter.next()
old_t_meta = ts_iter.next()
t_meta = ts_iter.next()
remote = {
'object_hash': 'theremotehash',
'ts_data': t_data,
'ts_meta': t_meta,
}
# missing
local = {}
expected = 'theremotehash dm'
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
# in-sync
local = {
'ts_data': t_data,
'ts_meta': t_meta,
}
expected = None
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
# out-of-sync
local = {
'ts_data': old_t_data,
'ts_meta': old_t_meta,
}
expected = 'theremotehash dm'
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
# old data
local = {
'ts_data': old_t_data,
'ts_meta': t_meta,
}
expected = 'theremotehash d'
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
# old metadata
local = {
'ts_data': t_data,
'ts_meta': old_t_meta,
}
expected = 'theremotehash m'
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
# in-sync tombstone
local = {
'ts_data': t_data,
}
expected = None
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
# old tombstone
local = {
'ts_data': old_t_data,
}
expected = 'theremotehash d'
self.assertEqual(ssync_receiver.encode_wanted(remote, local),
expected)
Object replication ssync (an rsync alternative) For this commit, ssync is just a direct replacement for how we use rsync. Assuming we switch over to ssync completely someday and drop rsync, we will then be able to improve the algorithms even further (removing local objects as we successfully transfer each one rather than waiting for whole partitions, using an index.db with hash-trees, etc., etc.) For easier review, this commit can be thought of in distinct parts: 1) New global_conf_callback functionality for allowing services to perform setup code before workers, etc. are launched. (This is then used by ssync in the object server to create a cross-worker semaphore to restrict concurrent incoming replication.) 2) A bit of shifting of items up from object server and replicator to diskfile or DEFAULT conf sections for better sharing of the same settings. conn_timeout, node_timeout, client_timeout, network_chunk_size, disk_chunk_size. 3) Modifications to the object server and replicator to optionally use ssync in place of rsync. This is done in a generic enough way that switching to FutureSync should be easy someday. 4) The biggest part, and (at least for now) completely optional part, are the new ssync_sender and ssync_receiver files. Nice and isolated for easier testing and visibility into test coverage, etc. All the usual logging, statsd, recon, etc. instrumentation is still there when using ssync, just as it is when using rsync. Beyond the essential error and exceptional condition logging, I have not added any additional instrumentation at this time. Unless there is something someone finds super pressing to have added to the logging, I think such additions would be better as separate change reviews. FOR NOW, IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED TO USE SSYNC ON PRODUCTION CLUSTERS. Some of us will be in a limited fashion to look for any subtle issues, tuning, etc. but generally ssync is an experimental feature. In its current implementation it is probably going to be a bit slower than rsync, but if all goes according to plan it will end up much faster. There are no comparisions yet between ssync and rsync other than some raw virtual machine testing I've done to show it should compete well enough once we can put it in use in the real world. If you Tweet, Google+, or whatever, be sure to indicate it's experimental. It'd be best to keep it out of deployment guides, howtos, etc. until we all figure out if we like it, find it to be stable, etc. Change-Id: If003dcc6f4109e2d2a42f4873a0779110fff16d6
2013-08-28 16:10:43 +00:00
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
Copy Permalink