Disallow fractional replicas in EC policies

Change-Id: I873d7bf7de54e4b1dccdafc8a61f03c09a65dfbc
Closes-Bug: 1554391
Closes-Bug: 1677547
This commit is contained in:
Tim Burke 2017-09-12 22:46:14 +00:00 committed by Samuel Merritt
parent b0cd86676d
commit 89a5c9d56f
5 changed files with 76 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ from swift.common.utils import hash_path, validate_configuration
from swift.common.ring.utils import tiers_for_dev
def calc_replica_count(replica2part2dev_id):
base = len(replica2part2dev_id) - 1
extra = 1.0 * len(replica2part2dev_id[-1]) / len(replica2part2dev_id[0])
return base + extra
class RingData(object):
"""Partitioned consistent hashing ring data (used for serialization)."""
@ -49,6 +55,11 @@ class RingData(object):
if dev is not None:
dev.setdefault("region", 1)
@property
def replica_count(self):
"""Number of replicas (full or partial) used in the ring."""
return calc_replica_count(self._replica2part2dev_id)
@classmethod
def deserialize_v1(cls, gz_file, metadata_only=False):
"""
@ -285,7 +296,7 @@ class Ring(object):
@property
def replica_count(self):
"""Number of replicas (full or partial) used in the ring."""
return len(self._replica2part2dev_id)
return calc_replica_count(self._replica2part2dev_id)
@property
def partition_count(self):

View File

@ -617,13 +617,13 @@ class ECStoragePolicy(BaseStoragePolicy):
considering the number of nodes in the primary list from the ring.
"""
configured_fragment_count = len(ring_data._replica2part2dev_id)
configured_fragment_count = ring_data.replica_count
required_fragment_count = \
(self.ec_n_unique_fragments) * self.ec_duplication_factor
if configured_fragment_count != required_fragment_count:
raise RingLoadError(
'EC ring for policy %s needs to be configured with '
'exactly %d replicas. Got %d.' % (
'exactly %d replicas. Got %s.' % (
self.name, required_fragment_count,
configured_fragment_count))

View File

@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ class TestCommands(unittest.TestCase, RunSwiftRingBuilderMixin):
msg += '%3d: %s\n' % (i, line)
self.fail(msg)
def create_sample_ring(self, part_power=6, overload=None, empty=False):
def create_sample_ring(self, part_power=6, replicas=3, overload=None,
empty=False):
"""
Create a sample ring with four devices
@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ class TestCommands(unittest.TestCase, RunSwiftRingBuilderMixin):
except OSError:
pass
ring = RingBuilder(part_power, 3, 1)
ring = RingBuilder(part_power, replicas, 1)
if overload is not None:
ring.set_overload(overload)
if not empty:
@ -2205,6 +2206,25 @@ class TestCommands(unittest.TestCase, RunSwiftRingBuilderMixin):
exp_results = {'valid_exit_codes': [2]}
self.run_srb(*argv, exp_results=exp_results)
def test_write_builder_fractional_replicas(self):
# Test builder file already exists
self.create_sample_ring(replicas=1.2)
argv = ["", self.tmpfile, "rebalance"]
self.assertSystemExit(EXIT_SUCCESS, ringbuilder.main, argv)
ring_file = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(self.tmpfile),
os.path.basename(self.tmpfile) + ".ring.gz")
os.remove(self.tmpfile) # loses file...
argv = ["", ring_file, "write_builder", "24"]
self.assertIsNone(ringbuilder.main(argv))
# Note that we've picked up an extension
builder = RingBuilder.load(self.tmpfile + '.builder')
# Note that this is different from the original! But it more-closely
# reflects the reality that we have an extra replica for 12 of 64 parts
self.assertEqual(builder.replicas, 1.1875)
def test_write_builder_after_device_removal(self):
# Test regenerating builder file after having removed a device
# and lost the builder file

View File

@ -163,6 +163,21 @@ class TestRingData(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(oct(stat.S_IMODE(os.stat(ring_fname).st_mode)),
'0644')
def test_replica_count(self):
rd = ring.RingData(
[[0, 1, 0, 1], [0, 1, 0, 1]],
[{'id': 0, 'zone': 0, 'ip': '10.1.1.0', 'port': 7000},
{'id': 1, 'zone': 1, 'ip': '10.1.1.1', 'port': 7000}],
30)
self.assertEqual(rd.replica_count, 2)
rd = ring.RingData(
[[0, 1, 0, 1], [0, 1, 0]],
[{'id': 0, 'zone': 0, 'ip': '10.1.1.0', 'port': 7000},
{'id': 1, 'zone': 1, 'ip': '10.1.1.1', 'port': 7000}],
30)
self.assertEqual(rd.replica_count, 1.75)
class TestRing(TestRingBase):
@ -217,6 +232,11 @@ class TestRing(TestRingBase):
mock.patch.object(utils, 'SWIFT_CONF_FILE', ''):
self.assertRaises(SystemExit, ring.Ring, self.testdir, 'whatever')
def test_replica_count(self):
self.assertEqual(self.ring.replica_count, 3)
self.ring._replica2part2dev_id.append([0])
self.assertEqual(self.ring.replica_count, 3.25)
def test_has_changed(self):
self.assertFalse(self.ring.has_changed())
os.utime(self.testgz, (time() + 60, time() + 60))

View File

@ -1299,25 +1299,31 @@ class TestStoragePolicies(unittest.TestCase):
ec_ndata=4, ec_nparity=2,
ec_duplication_factor=2)
]
actual_load_ring_replicas = [8, 10, 7, 11]
policies = StoragePolicyCollection(test_policies)
class MockRingData(object):
def __init__(self, num_replica):
self._replica2part2dev_id = [0] * num_replica
self.replica_count = num_replica
for policy, ring_replicas in zip(policies, actual_load_ring_replicas):
with mock.patch('swift.common.ring.ring.RingData.load',
return_value=MockRingData(ring_replicas)):
necessary_replica_num = \
policy.ec_n_unique_fragments * policy.ec_duplication_factor
with mock.patch(
'swift.common.ring.ring.validate_configuration'):
msg = 'EC ring for policy %s needs to be configured with ' \
'exactly %d replicas.' % \
(policy.name, necessary_replica_num)
self.assertRaisesWithMessage(RingLoadError, msg,
policy.load_ring, 'mock')
def do_test(actual_load_ring_replicas):
for policy, ring_replicas in zip(policies,
actual_load_ring_replicas):
with mock.patch('swift.common.ring.ring.RingData.load',
return_value=MockRingData(ring_replicas)):
necessary_replica_num = (policy.ec_n_unique_fragments *
policy.ec_duplication_factor)
with mock.patch(
'swift.common.ring.ring.validate_configuration'):
msg = 'EC ring for policy %s needs to be configured ' \
'with exactly %d replicas.' % \
(policy.name, necessary_replica_num)
self.assertRaisesWithMessage(RingLoadError, msg,
policy.load_ring, 'mock')
# first, do somethign completely different
do_test([8, 10, 7, 11])
# then again, closer to true, but fractional
do_test([9.9, 14.1, 5.99999, 12.000000001])
def test_storage_policy_get_info(self):
test_policies = [