556 lines
25 KiB
Python
556 lines
25 KiB
Python
#!/usr/bin/python -u
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
# implied.
|
|
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
# limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
from hashlib import md5
|
|
import time
|
|
import uuid
|
|
import random
|
|
import unittest
|
|
|
|
from swift.common.manager import Manager
|
|
from swift.common.internal_client import InternalClient
|
|
from swift.common import utils, direct_client
|
|
from swift.common.storage_policy import POLICIES
|
|
from swift.common.http import HTTP_NOT_FOUND
|
|
from test.probe.brain import BrainSplitter
|
|
from test.probe.common import (ReplProbeTest, ENABLED_POLICIES,
|
|
POLICIES_BY_TYPE, REPL_POLICY)
|
|
|
|
from swiftclient import client, ClientException
|
|
|
|
TIMEOUT = 60
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestContainerMergePolicyIndex(ReplProbeTest):
|
|
|
|
@unittest.skipIf(len(ENABLED_POLICIES) < 2, "Need more than one policy")
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
super(TestContainerMergePolicyIndex, self).setUp()
|
|
self.container_name = 'container-%s' % uuid.uuid4()
|
|
self.object_name = 'object-%s' % uuid.uuid4()
|
|
self.brain = BrainSplitter(self.url, self.token, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name, 'container')
|
|
|
|
def _get_object_patiently(self, policy_index):
|
|
# use proxy to access object (bad container info might be cached...)
|
|
timeout = time.time() + TIMEOUT
|
|
while time.time() < timeout:
|
|
try:
|
|
return client.get_object(self.url, self.token,
|
|
self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name)
|
|
except ClientException as err:
|
|
if err.http_status != HTTP_NOT_FOUND:
|
|
raise
|
|
time.sleep(1)
|
|
else:
|
|
self.fail('could not HEAD /%s/%s/%s/ from policy %s '
|
|
'after %s seconds.' % (
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
int(policy_index), TIMEOUT))
|
|
|
|
def test_merge_storage_policy_index(self):
|
|
# generic split brain
|
|
self.brain.stop_primary_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container()
|
|
self.brain.start_primary_half()
|
|
self.brain.stop_handoff_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container()
|
|
self.brain.put_object(headers={'x-object-meta-test': 'custom-meta'},
|
|
contents=b'VERIFY')
|
|
self.brain.start_handoff_half()
|
|
# make sure we have some manner of split brain
|
|
container_part, container_nodes = self.container_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses = []
|
|
for node in container_nodes:
|
|
metadata = direct_client.direct_head_container(
|
|
node, container_part, self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses.append((node, metadata))
|
|
found_policy_indexes = {
|
|
metadata['X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index']
|
|
for node, metadata in head_responses}
|
|
self.assertGreater(
|
|
len(found_policy_indexes), 1,
|
|
'primary nodes did not disagree about policy index %r' %
|
|
head_responses)
|
|
# find our object
|
|
orig_policy_index = None
|
|
for policy_index in found_policy_indexes:
|
|
object_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(policy_index, '/etc/swift')
|
|
part, nodes = object_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name)
|
|
for node in nodes:
|
|
try:
|
|
direct_client.direct_head_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name,
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index':
|
|
policy_index})
|
|
except direct_client.ClientException as err:
|
|
continue
|
|
orig_policy_index = policy_index
|
|
break
|
|
if orig_policy_index is not None:
|
|
break
|
|
else:
|
|
self.fail('Unable to find /%s/%s/%s in %r' % (
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
found_policy_indexes))
|
|
self.get_to_final_state()
|
|
Manager(['container-reconciler']).once()
|
|
# validate containers
|
|
head_responses = []
|
|
for node in container_nodes:
|
|
metadata = direct_client.direct_head_container(
|
|
node, container_part, self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses.append((node, metadata))
|
|
found_policy_indexes = {
|
|
metadata['X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index']
|
|
for node, metadata in head_responses}
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(found_policy_indexes), 1,
|
|
'primary nodes disagree about policy index %r' %
|
|
head_responses)
|
|
|
|
expected_policy_index = found_policy_indexes.pop()
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(orig_policy_index, expected_policy_index)
|
|
# validate object placement
|
|
orig_policy_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(orig_policy_index,
|
|
'/etc/swift')
|
|
for node in orig_policy_ring.devs:
|
|
try:
|
|
direct_client.direct_head_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name, headers={
|
|
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': orig_policy_index})
|
|
except direct_client.ClientException as err:
|
|
if err.http_status == HTTP_NOT_FOUND:
|
|
continue
|
|
raise
|
|
else:
|
|
self.fail('Found /%s/%s/%s in %s' % (
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
orig_policy_index))
|
|
# verify that the object data read by external client is correct
|
|
headers, data = self._get_object_patiently(expected_policy_index)
|
|
self.assertEqual(b'VERIFY', data)
|
|
self.assertEqual('custom-meta', headers['x-object-meta-test'])
|
|
|
|
def test_reconcile_delete(self):
|
|
# generic split brain
|
|
self.brain.stop_primary_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container()
|
|
self.brain.put_object()
|
|
self.brain.start_primary_half()
|
|
self.brain.stop_handoff_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container()
|
|
self.brain.delete_object()
|
|
self.brain.start_handoff_half()
|
|
# make sure we have some manner of split brain
|
|
container_part, container_nodes = self.container_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses = []
|
|
for node in container_nodes:
|
|
metadata = direct_client.direct_head_container(
|
|
node, container_part, self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses.append((node, metadata))
|
|
found_policy_indexes = {
|
|
metadata['X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index']
|
|
for node, metadata in head_responses}
|
|
self.assertGreater(
|
|
len(found_policy_indexes), 1,
|
|
'primary nodes did not disagree about policy index %r' %
|
|
head_responses)
|
|
# find our object
|
|
orig_policy_index = ts_policy_index = None
|
|
for policy_index in found_policy_indexes:
|
|
object_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(policy_index, '/etc/swift')
|
|
part, nodes = object_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name)
|
|
for node in nodes:
|
|
try:
|
|
direct_client.direct_head_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name,
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index':
|
|
policy_index})
|
|
except direct_client.ClientException as err:
|
|
if 'x-backend-timestamp' in err.http_headers:
|
|
ts_policy_index = policy_index
|
|
break
|
|
else:
|
|
orig_policy_index = policy_index
|
|
break
|
|
if not orig_policy_index:
|
|
self.fail('Unable to find /%s/%s/%s in %r' % (
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
found_policy_indexes))
|
|
if not ts_policy_index:
|
|
self.fail('Unable to find tombstone /%s/%s/%s in %r' % (
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
found_policy_indexes))
|
|
self.get_to_final_state()
|
|
Manager(['container-reconciler']).once()
|
|
# validate containers
|
|
head_responses = []
|
|
for node in container_nodes:
|
|
metadata = direct_client.direct_head_container(
|
|
node, container_part, self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses.append((node, metadata))
|
|
node_to_policy = {
|
|
node['port']: metadata['X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index']
|
|
for node, metadata in head_responses}
|
|
policies = set(node_to_policy.values())
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(policies), 1,
|
|
'primary nodes disagree about policy index %r' %
|
|
node_to_policy)
|
|
expected_policy_index = policies.pop()
|
|
self.assertEqual(orig_policy_index, expected_policy_index)
|
|
# validate object fully deleted
|
|
for policy_index in found_policy_indexes:
|
|
object_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(policy_index, '/etc/swift')
|
|
part, nodes = object_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name)
|
|
for node in nodes:
|
|
try:
|
|
direct_client.direct_head_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name,
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index':
|
|
policy_index})
|
|
except direct_client.ClientException as err:
|
|
if err.http_status == HTTP_NOT_FOUND:
|
|
continue
|
|
else:
|
|
self.fail('Found /%s/%s/%s in %s on %s' % (
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
orig_policy_index, node))
|
|
|
|
def test_reconcile_manifest(self):
|
|
if 'slo' not in self.cluster_info:
|
|
raise unittest.SkipTest(
|
|
"SLO not enabled in proxy; can't test manifest reconciliation")
|
|
# this test is not only testing a split brain scenario on
|
|
# multiple policies with mis-placed objects - it even writes out
|
|
# a static large object directly to the storage nodes while the
|
|
# objects are unavailably mis-placed from *behind* the proxy and
|
|
# doesn't know how to do that for EC_POLICY (clayg: why did you
|
|
# guys let me write a test that does this!?) - so we force
|
|
# wrong_policy (where the manifest gets written) to be one of
|
|
# any of your configured REPL_POLICY (we know you have one
|
|
# because this is a ReplProbeTest)
|
|
wrong_policy = random.choice(POLICIES_BY_TYPE[REPL_POLICY])
|
|
policy = random.choice([p for p in ENABLED_POLICIES
|
|
if p is not wrong_policy])
|
|
manifest_data = []
|
|
|
|
def write_part(i):
|
|
body = b'VERIFY%0.2d' % i + b'\x00' * 1048576
|
|
part_name = 'manifest_part_%0.2d' % i
|
|
manifest_entry = {
|
|
"path": "/%s/%s" % (self.container_name, part_name),
|
|
"etag": md5(body).hexdigest(),
|
|
"size_bytes": len(body),
|
|
}
|
|
client.put_object(self.url, self.token, self.container_name,
|
|
part_name, contents=body)
|
|
manifest_data.append(manifest_entry)
|
|
|
|
# get an old container stashed
|
|
self.brain.stop_primary_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container(int(policy))
|
|
self.brain.start_primary_half()
|
|
# write some parts
|
|
for i in range(10):
|
|
write_part(i)
|
|
|
|
self.brain.stop_handoff_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container(int(wrong_policy))
|
|
# write some more parts
|
|
for i in range(10, 20):
|
|
write_part(i)
|
|
|
|
# write manifest
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ClientException) as catcher:
|
|
client.put_object(self.url, self.token, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name,
|
|
contents=utils.json.dumps(manifest_data),
|
|
query_string='multipart-manifest=put')
|
|
|
|
# so as it works out, you can't really upload a multi-part
|
|
# manifest for objects that are currently misplaced - you have to
|
|
# wait until they're all available - which is about the same as
|
|
# some other failure that causes data to be unavailable to the
|
|
# proxy at the time of upload
|
|
self.assertEqual(catcher.exception.http_status, 400)
|
|
|
|
# but what the heck, we'll sneak one in just to see what happens...
|
|
direct_manifest_name = self.object_name + '-direct-test'
|
|
object_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(wrong_policy.idx, '/etc/swift')
|
|
part, nodes = object_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, direct_manifest_name)
|
|
container_part = self.container_ring.get_part(self.account,
|
|
self.container_name)
|
|
|
|
def translate_direct(data):
|
|
return {
|
|
'hash': data['etag'],
|
|
'bytes': data['size_bytes'],
|
|
'name': data['path'],
|
|
}
|
|
direct_manifest_data = [translate_direct(item)
|
|
for item in manifest_data]
|
|
headers = {
|
|
'x-container-host': ','.join('%s:%s' % (n['ip'], n['port']) for n
|
|
in self.container_ring.devs),
|
|
'x-container-device': ','.join(n['device'] for n in
|
|
self.container_ring.devs),
|
|
'x-container-partition': container_part,
|
|
'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': wrong_policy.idx,
|
|
'X-Static-Large-Object': 'True',
|
|
}
|
|
body = utils.json.dumps(direct_manifest_data).encode('ascii')
|
|
for node in nodes:
|
|
direct_client.direct_put_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name,
|
|
direct_manifest_name,
|
|
contents=body,
|
|
headers=headers)
|
|
break # one should do it...
|
|
|
|
self.brain.start_handoff_half()
|
|
self.get_to_final_state()
|
|
Manager(['container-reconciler']).once()
|
|
# clear proxy cache
|
|
client.post_container(self.url, self.token, self.container_name, {})
|
|
|
|
# let's see how that direct upload worked out...
|
|
metadata, body = client.get_object(
|
|
self.url, self.token, self.container_name, direct_manifest_name,
|
|
query_string='multipart-manifest=get')
|
|
self.assertEqual(metadata['x-static-large-object'].lower(), 'true')
|
|
for i, entry in enumerate(utils.json.loads(body)):
|
|
for key in ('hash', 'bytes', 'name'):
|
|
self.assertEqual(entry[key], direct_manifest_data[i][key])
|
|
metadata, body = client.get_object(
|
|
self.url, self.token, self.container_name, direct_manifest_name)
|
|
self.assertEqual(metadata['x-static-large-object'].lower(), 'true')
|
|
self.assertEqual(int(metadata['content-length']),
|
|
sum(part['size_bytes'] for part in manifest_data))
|
|
self.assertEqual(body, b''.join(b'VERIFY%0.2d' % i + b'\x00' * 1048576
|
|
for i in range(20)))
|
|
|
|
# and regular upload should work now too
|
|
client.put_object(self.url, self.token, self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name,
|
|
contents=utils.json.dumps(manifest_data),
|
|
query_string='multipart-manifest=put')
|
|
metadata = client.head_object(self.url, self.token,
|
|
self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name)
|
|
self.assertEqual(int(metadata['content-length']),
|
|
sum(part['size_bytes'] for part in manifest_data))
|
|
|
|
def test_reconcile_symlink(self):
|
|
if 'symlink' not in self.cluster_info:
|
|
raise unittest.SkipTest(
|
|
"Symlink not enabled in proxy; can't test "
|
|
"symlink reconciliation")
|
|
wrong_policy = random.choice(ENABLED_POLICIES)
|
|
policy = random.choice([p for p in ENABLED_POLICIES
|
|
if p is not wrong_policy])
|
|
# get an old container stashed
|
|
self.brain.stop_primary_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container(int(policy))
|
|
self.brain.start_primary_half()
|
|
# write some target data
|
|
client.put_object(self.url, self.token, self.container_name, 'target',
|
|
contents=b'this is the target data')
|
|
|
|
# write the symlink
|
|
self.brain.stop_handoff_half()
|
|
self.brain.put_container(int(wrong_policy))
|
|
client.put_object(
|
|
self.url, self.token, self.container_name, 'symlink',
|
|
headers={
|
|
'X-Symlink-Target': '%s/target' % self.container_name,
|
|
'Content-Type': 'application/symlink',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
# at this point we have a broken symlink (the container_info has the
|
|
# proxy looking for the target in the wrong policy)
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ClientException) as ctx:
|
|
client.get_object(self.url, self.token, self.container_name,
|
|
'symlink')
|
|
self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.http_status, 404)
|
|
|
|
# of course the symlink itself is fine
|
|
metadata, body = client.get_object(self.url, self.token,
|
|
self.container_name, 'symlink',
|
|
query_string='symlink=get')
|
|
self.assertEqual(metadata['x-symlink-target'],
|
|
'%s/target' % self.container_name)
|
|
self.assertEqual(metadata['content-type'], 'application/symlink')
|
|
self.assertEqual(body, b'')
|
|
# ... although in the wrong policy
|
|
object_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(int(wrong_policy), '/etc/swift')
|
|
part, nodes = object_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, 'symlink')
|
|
for node in nodes:
|
|
metadata = direct_client.direct_head_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name, 'symlink',
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(wrong_policy)})
|
|
self.assertEqual(metadata['X-Object-Sysmeta-Symlink-Target'],
|
|
'%s/target' % self.container_name)
|
|
|
|
# let the reconciler run
|
|
self.brain.start_handoff_half()
|
|
self.get_to_final_state()
|
|
Manager(['container-reconciler']).once()
|
|
# clear proxy cache
|
|
client.post_container(self.url, self.token, self.container_name, {})
|
|
|
|
# now the symlink works
|
|
metadata, body = client.get_object(self.url, self.token,
|
|
self.container_name, 'symlink')
|
|
self.assertEqual(body, b'this is the target data')
|
|
# and it's in the correct policy
|
|
object_ring = POLICIES.get_object_ring(int(policy), '/etc/swift')
|
|
part, nodes = object_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, 'symlink')
|
|
for node in nodes:
|
|
metadata = direct_client.direct_head_object(
|
|
node, part, self.account, self.container_name, 'symlink',
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(policy)})
|
|
self.assertEqual(metadata['X-Object-Sysmeta-Symlink-Target'],
|
|
'%s/target' % self.container_name)
|
|
|
|
def test_reconciler_move_object_twice(self):
|
|
# select some policies
|
|
old_policy = random.choice(ENABLED_POLICIES)
|
|
new_policy = random.choice([p for p in ENABLED_POLICIES
|
|
if p != old_policy])
|
|
|
|
# setup a split brain
|
|
self.brain.stop_handoff_half()
|
|
# get old_policy on two primaries
|
|
self.brain.put_container(policy_index=int(old_policy))
|
|
self.brain.start_handoff_half()
|
|
self.brain.stop_primary_half()
|
|
# force a recreate on handoffs
|
|
self.brain.put_container(policy_index=int(old_policy))
|
|
self.brain.delete_container()
|
|
self.brain.put_container(policy_index=int(new_policy))
|
|
self.brain.put_object() # populate memcache with new_policy
|
|
self.brain.start_primary_half()
|
|
|
|
# at this point two primaries have old policy
|
|
container_part, container_nodes = self.container_ring.get_nodes(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name)
|
|
head_responses = [
|
|
(node, direct_client.direct_head_container(
|
|
node, container_part, self.account, self.container_name))
|
|
for node in container_nodes]
|
|
old_container_nodes = [
|
|
node for node, metadata in head_responses
|
|
if int(old_policy) ==
|
|
int(metadata['X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index'])]
|
|
self.assertEqual(2, len(old_container_nodes))
|
|
|
|
# hopefully memcache still has the new policy cached
|
|
self.brain.put_object(headers={'x-object-meta-test': 'custom-meta'},
|
|
contents=b'VERIFY')
|
|
# double-check object correctly written to new policy
|
|
conf_files = []
|
|
for server in Manager(['container-reconciler']).servers:
|
|
conf_files.extend(server.conf_files())
|
|
conf_file = conf_files[0]
|
|
int_client = InternalClient(conf_file, 'probe-test', 3)
|
|
int_client.get_object_metadata(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(new_policy)})
|
|
int_client.get_object_metadata(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
acceptable_statuses=(4,),
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(old_policy)})
|
|
|
|
# shutdown the containers that know about the new policy
|
|
self.brain.stop_handoff_half()
|
|
|
|
# and get rows enqueued from old nodes
|
|
for server_type in ('container-replicator', 'container-updater'):
|
|
server = Manager([server_type])
|
|
for node in old_container_nodes:
|
|
server.once(number=self.config_number(node))
|
|
|
|
# verify entry in the queue for the "misplaced" new_policy
|
|
for container in int_client.iter_containers('.misplaced_objects'):
|
|
for obj in int_client.iter_objects('.misplaced_objects',
|
|
container['name']):
|
|
expected = '%d:/%s/%s/%s' % (new_policy, self.account,
|
|
self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name)
|
|
self.assertEqual(obj['name'], expected)
|
|
|
|
Manager(['container-reconciler']).once()
|
|
|
|
# verify object in old_policy
|
|
int_client.get_object_metadata(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(old_policy)})
|
|
|
|
# verify object is *not* in new_policy
|
|
int_client.get_object_metadata(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
acceptable_statuses=(4,),
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(new_policy)})
|
|
|
|
self.get_to_final_state()
|
|
|
|
# verify entry in the queue
|
|
for container in int_client.iter_containers('.misplaced_objects'):
|
|
for obj in int_client.iter_objects('.misplaced_objects',
|
|
container['name']):
|
|
expected = '%d:/%s/%s/%s' % (old_policy, self.account,
|
|
self.container_name,
|
|
self.object_name)
|
|
self.assertEqual(obj['name'], expected)
|
|
|
|
Manager(['container-reconciler']).once()
|
|
|
|
# and now it flops back
|
|
int_client.get_object_metadata(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(new_policy)})
|
|
int_client.get_object_metadata(
|
|
self.account, self.container_name, self.object_name,
|
|
acceptable_statuses=(4,),
|
|
headers={'X-Backend-Storage-Policy-Index': int(old_policy)})
|
|
|
|
# make sure the queue is settled
|
|
self.get_to_final_state()
|
|
for container in int_client.iter_containers('.misplaced_objects'):
|
|
for obj in int_client.iter_objects('.misplaced_objects',
|
|
container['name']):
|
|
self.fail('Found unexpected object %r in the queue' % obj)
|
|
|
|
# verify that the object data read by external client is correct
|
|
headers, data = self._get_object_patiently(int(new_policy))
|
|
self.assertEqual(b'VERIFY', data)
|
|
self.assertEqual('custom-meta', headers['x-object-meta-test'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
unittest.main()
|