Merge "Fix typo in multi tenant for LCM specification"
This commit is contained in:
commit
1b6fc93b41
|
@ -51,15 +51,15 @@ Management operations that occurred in different tenants.
|
|||
Currently Tacker can associate a VIM with a VNF, even if both belong to
|
||||
different tenants.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, admin user can instantiate VNF using VIM belongs to different
|
||||
For example, admin user can instantiate VNF using VIM belonging to different
|
||||
tenant than VNF.
|
||||
None admin user cannot terminate VNF because the none admin user isn't belong
|
||||
to tenant of VIM.
|
||||
A non-admin user cannot terminate VNF because the non-admin user doesn't belong
|
||||
to the tenant of VIM.
|
||||
|
||||
#. None admin user creates a VNF.
|
||||
#. Admin user instantiates the VNF by specifying a VIM to which non-admin user
|
||||
doesn't belong.
|
||||
#. None admin user cannot terminates the VNF.
|
||||
#. The non-admin user creates a VNF.
|
||||
#. The admin user instantiates the VNF by specifying a VIM to which the non-admin
|
||||
user doesn't belong.
|
||||
#. The non-admin user cannot terminates the VNF.
|
||||
|
||||
It does not problem that the admin user can get resource information for VNF or
|
||||
operate VNF LCM.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue