Allow just specifying 'workers' for WBE entrypoint
Instead of requiring and only finding 'worker-based' just instead add the ability to use 'workers' as the addition of '-based' doesn't add much value and isn't really that beneficial/useful to have to type/require. Change-Id: Icacb933e87147e421589457338d13fd8d59e0e55
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9c250af57
commit
e3e2950bf5
|
@ -182,10 +182,10 @@ using your desired execution model.
|
|||
:pybug:`22393` and others...) as the most recent python version (which
|
||||
themselves have a variety of ongoing/recent bugs).
|
||||
|
||||
Worker-based
|
||||
------------
|
||||
Workers
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
**Engine type**: ``'worker-based'``
|
||||
**Engine type**: ``'worker-based'`` or ``'workers'``
|
||||
|
||||
.. note:: Since this engine is significantly more complicated (and
|
||||
different) then the others we thought it appropriate to devote a
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ taskflow.engines =
|
|||
serial = taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine:SerialActionEngine
|
||||
parallel = taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine:ParallelActionEngine
|
||||
worker-based = taskflow.engines.worker_based.engine:WorkerBasedActionEngine
|
||||
workers = taskflow.engines.worker_based.engine:WorkerBasedActionEngine
|
||||
|
||||
[nosetests]
|
||||
cover-erase = true
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue