openstack
/
tricircle
Code Issues Proposed changes

lbaas.rst line chart showing confusion in github 

1. What is the problem?

Browsing the lbaas.rst file on github, the line
chart appears confusion.

2. What is the solution to the problem?
update lbaas.rst format.

Change-Id: Ia1e890cc1ffb1daa33038c69d235b671efa14986
Signed-off-by: zhang xiaohan <zhangxiaohan@szzt.com.cn>
Co-Authored-By: tangzhuo <ztang@hnu.edu.cn>
This commit is contained in:
zhangxiaohan 2018-09-19 03:05:41 -07:00
parent c3e4a072bb
commit 03e593be24
1 changed files with 56 additions and 54 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

90
specs/queens/lbaas.rst
View File

@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ Octavia, we plan to deploy LBaaS as follows. ::
+---------------------------+
Central Region
+----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
| +----------------+ | | +----------------+ |
| | LBaaS Octavia | | | | LBaaS Octavia | |
| +----------------+ | | +----------------+ |
| +------+ +---------------+ | | +-------+ +---------------+ |
| | Nova | | Local Neutron | | | | Nova | | Local Neutron | |
| +------+ +---------------+ | | +-------+ +---------------+ |
+----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
+----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
| +----------------+ | | +----------------+ |
| | LBaaS Octavia | | | | LBaaS Octavia | |
| +----------------+ | | +----------------+ |
| +------+ +---------------+ | | +-------+ +---------------+ |
| | Nova | | Local Neutron | | | | Nova | | Local Neutron | |
| +------+ +---------------+ | | +-------+ +---------------+ |
+----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
Region One Region Two
As demonstrated in the figure above, for each region where a local neutron
@ -96,25 +96,26 @@ LBaaS members in multiple regions
1. members in the same subnet yet locating in different regions
---------------------------------------------------------------
As shown below. ::
+-------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
| +---------------------------+ | | |
| | Amphora | | | |
| | | | | |
| | +-------+ +---------+ | | | |
| +--+ mgmt +--+ subnet1 +---+ | | |
| +-------+ +---------+ | | |
| | | |
| +--------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| | | member1 | | member2 | | | | | | member3 | | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| +--------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| network1(subnet1) | | network1(subnet1) |
+-------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
+-------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
| +---------------------------+ | | |
| | Amphora | | | |
| | | | | |
| | +-------+ +---------+ | | | |
| +--+ mgmt +--+ subnet1 +---+ | | |
| +-------+ +---------+ | | |
| | | |
| +--------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| | | member1 | | member2 | | | | | | member3 | | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| +--------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| network1(subnet1) | | network1(subnet1) |
+-------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
Region One Region Two
Fig. 1. The scenario of balancing load across instances of one subnet which
reside in different regions.
Fig. 1. The scenario of balancing load across instances of one subnet which
reside in different regions.
As shown in Fig. 1, suppose that a load balancer is created in Region one,
and hence a listener, a pool, and two members in subnet1. When adding an
@ -126,27 +127,28 @@ a pool.
2. members residing in different subnets and regions
----------------------------------------------------
As shown below. ::
+---------------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
| +-----------------------------------+ | | |
| | Amphora | | | |
| | | | | |
| | +---------+ +------+ +---------+ | | | |
| +-+ subnet2 +--+ mgmt +-+ subnet1 +-+ | | |
| +---------+ +------+ +---------+ | | |
| | | |
| +----------------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| | | | | | | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| | | member1 | | member2 | | | | | | member3 | | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| | | | | | | |
| +----------------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| network1(subnet1) | | network2(subnet2) |
+---------------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
+---------------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
| +-----------------------------------+ | | |
| | Amphora | | | |
| | | | | |
| | +---------+ +------+ +---------+ | | | |
| +-+ subnet2 +--+ mgmt +-+ subnet1 +-+ | | |
| +---------+ +------+ +---------+ | | |
| | | |
| +----------------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| | | | | | | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| | | member1 | | member2 | | | | | | member3 | | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ | | | | +---------+ | |
| | | | | | | |
| +----------------------------------+ | | +-------------------+ |
| network1(subnet1) | | network2(subnet2) |
+---------------------------------------+ +-----------------------+
Region One Region Two
Fig. 2. The scenario of balancing load across instances of different subnets
which reside in different regions as well.
Fig. 2. The scenario of balancing load across instances of different subnets
which reside in different regions as well.
As show in Fig. 2, supposing that a load balancer is created in region one, as
well as a listener, a pool, and two members in subnet1. When adding an instance