tripleo-common/workbooks/messaging.yaml
Dougal Matthews b5d5cbab32 Verify the Swift container exists with a small utility workflow
The previous method of `swift.head_container` worked well, but it caused
Mistral to log the exception raised by swiftclient. This then left a red
flag in the logs that confused users debugging.

This new method checks for the container by listing all the containers
in the account and checking for the name. We only consider containers
that start with the full name we are looking for - Swift doesn't have an
exact match, only a prefix filter.

The workflow then can be used to create the container, capturing the
logic that was duplicated in each individual workflow.

Closes-Bug: #1730712
Depends-On: I41649d15c57e16bffcf7870a52bc01177aae7cc8
Change-Id: I4a6b5b9b31a4f76840a6c6070a1d733ceade5c64
2018-06-28 12:33:59 +01:00

145 lines
5.2 KiB
YAML

---
version: '2.0'
name: tripleo.messaging.v1
description: TripleO Zaqar Workflows
workflows:
send:
description: >-
Send a message to a Zaqar queue and optionally persist it to Swift
This workflow sends a standard message to Zaqar (taking care of the
error handling and retry logic) and optionally persists the message
to Swift. The output of the workflow directly matches the input, this
means it can be used to send a message and set the output of the parent
calling workflow.
If plan_name is provided the message will be persisted to Swift. In a
container named "{plan_name}-messages". The swift objects will be
named:
{TYPE}/{TIMESTAMP}.yaml
If a deployment_status is provided, the top-level deployment_status.yaml
will also be updated, which will contain the deployment_status and the
related message.
The standard message format will be:
body: {
type: 'tripleo.workflow.name', # Matches the workflow name
payload: {
status: 'STATUS', # One of RUNNING, SUCCESS, FAILED
execution: {execution details}, # Deprecated and will be removed in the future.
execution_id: 'UUID',
message: "Human readable description",
< Arbitrary data. This should match the workflow output data >
}
}
Workflow Input:
queue_name - The Zaqar queue name to post to.
type - The message type, this should match the calling workflows name
execution - Details about the workflow execution. Should be passed by using <% execution() %>
status - Optional. The status of the message. SUCCESS/RUNNING/FAILED.
message - Optional. A human readable message to be included
payload - Optional. A dictionary output data to be sent in the message.
plan_name - Optional. The deployment plan name. This is used for the swift messages container.
deployment_status - Optional. If set the top-level deployment_status.yaml will be updated.
input:
- queue_name
- type
- execution
- status: 'SUCCESS'
- message: null
- payload: {}
- plan_name: null
- deployment_status: null
tags:
- tripleo-common-managed
output:
type: <% $.type %>
payload: <% $.payload %>
tasks:
merge_payload:
on-success:
publish:
branch:
# The payload with arbitrary keys is merged with the status, message and execution.
payload: <% {status => $.status, message => $.message, execution => $.execution, execution_id => $.execution.id, plan_name => $.plan_name, deployment_status => $.deployment_status} + $.payload %>
next: prepare_messages
prepare_messages:
on-success:
publish:
branch:
swift_message: <% {type => $.type, payload => $.payload} %>
deployment_status_message: <% {deployment_status => $.deployment_status, workflow_status => {type => $.type, payload => $.payload}} %>
container: <% "{0}-messages".format($.plan_name) %>
next: branch_workflow
# It should be possible for this to happen in the next section above, but
# there seems to be a Mistral bug... to be confirmed...
branch_workflow:
on-success:
- send_message
- complete_swift: <% not bool($.plan_name) %>
- verify_container_exists: <% bool($.plan_name) %>
send_message:
action: zaqar.queue_post
retry: count=5 delay=1
input:
queue_name: <% $.queue_name %>
messages:
body: <% {type => $.type, payload => $.payload} %>
on-success: check_status
verify_container_exists:
workflow: tripleo.swift.v1.container_exists container=<% $.container %>
input:
create_container: true
on-success:
- wait_for_swift: <% not bool($.deployment_status) %>
- persist_to_swift_plan_latest: <% bool($.deployment_status) %>
- persist_to_swift
persist_to_swift:
action: swift.put_object
input:
container: <% $.container %>
obj: <% "{0}/{1}.yaml".format($.type, now().format("%Y-%m-%d_%H:%M:%S")) %>
contents: <% yaml_dump($.swift_message) %>
on-success: wait_for_swift
persist_to_swift_plan_latest:
action: swift.put_object
input:
container: <% $.container %>
obj: <% "deployment_status.yaml" %>
contents: <% yaml_dump($.deployment_status_message) %>
on-success: wait_for_swift
wait_for_swift:
# We want persist_to_swift and either persist_to_swift_plan_latest or
# verify_container_exists to join here. Two of the three tasks.
join: 2
on-success: complete_swift
complete_swift:
on-success: check_status
check_status:
# We want both complete_swift and send_message to join here. This means
# that zaqar and swift (if enabled) will all be finished.
join: all
on-complete:
- fail(msg="Workflow failed due to message status"): <% $.get('status') = "FAILED" %>