From e68ed6f7cc5e2b0039015dfa9d63c14ccd908c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francesco Pantano Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:20:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove CrushRules coverage from scenario001 We see many issues in CI due to the missing hdd device class. This is something that can be related to the fact that only 1 OSD in this job is built on top of a loop device. For this reason, and in order to keep the CI healthy, it's safe removing the device classes coverage. In addition, since there is only 1 osd, add and configure tiering in this context makes no sense. Change-Id: I4638b9badd17a7a75642895623a63753534fd341 --- ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml b/ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml index a839ebaf03..96e751910f 100644 --- a/ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml +++ b/ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ parameter_defaults: CeilometerQdrPublishMetrics: true ManageEventPipeline: true ManagePipeline: true - Debug: true CephSpecFqdn: true CephOsdSpec: @@ -65,16 +64,10 @@ parameter_defaults: CephPoolDefaultPgNum: 8 CephPoolDefaultSize: 1 CinderRbdExtraPools: altrbd,pool2,pool3 - CephCrushRules: - - name: HDD - root: default - type: host - class: hdd - default: true CephPools: - name: altrbd pg_num: 8 - rule_name: HDD + rule_name: replicated_rule #NOTE: These ID's and keys should be regenerated for # a production deployment. What is here is suitable for # developer and CI testing only.