Update patch set 2

Patch Set 2:

(5 comments)

thanks for your reviews update incoming

Patch-set: 2

1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52

@@ -23,6 +23,30 @@
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
       "unresolved": true
     },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "88f3752c_e535775f",
+        "filename": "specs/xena/tripleo-independent-release.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 46,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 8449
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2021-07-28T16:37:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "the previous paragraph lays that out no? \"This creates an ongoing maintenance and resource burden\". i will add some more words though see if you prefer the next version ;)",
+      "parentUuid": "c61317e6_b95eea13",
+      "range": {
+        "startLine": 42,
+        "startChar": 0,
+        "endLine": 46,
+        "endChar": 52
+      },
+      "revId": "1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": true
+    },
     {
       "key": {
         "uuid": "9d802db6_6eec3b73",
@@ -70,6 +94,30 @@
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
       "unresolved": true
     },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "49bf7a32_7e0ca06c",
+        "filename": "specs/xena/tripleo-independent-release.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 65,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 8449
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2021-07-28T16:37:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "@Jesse not following what the request is though you want me to elaborate on something here? \n\n@Bogdan how does it contradict. Developers won\u0027t have to cherrypick to branches that we choose not to create. We will continue to have cherrypicks and ci jobs and all that stuff for the branches we do create.",
+      "parentUuid": "817a8538_a367e1dd",
+      "range": {
+        "startLine": 65,
+        "startChar": 0,
+        "endLine": 65,
+        "endChar": 10
+      },
+      "revId": "1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": true
+    },
     {
       "key": {
         "uuid": "477a0306_a4bffb5a",
@@ -87,6 +135,24 @@
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
       "unresolved": true
     },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "40d28a99_43ea4d25",
+        "filename": "specs/xena/tripleo-independent-release.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 68,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 8449
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2021-07-28T16:37:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "right but say we decide not to create the X branch. Then we don\u0027t have any X ci jobs or periodic promotion jobs etc etc. SO we don\u0027t consume X from other repos/OpenStack services/libraries. ? In other words where will you consume those libraries we won\u0027t have any ci in place. \n\nWe will always be running those jobs (i.e. consuming ) for master branch, and any of the branches we choose to create. \n\nBasically we are saying that tripleo will no longer support all openstack releases.",
+      "parentUuid": "477a0306_a4bffb5a",
+      "revId": "1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": true
+    },
     {
       "key": {
         "uuid": "ccb73a57_c485e104",
@@ -104,6 +170,24 @@
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
       "unresolved": true
     },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "b0970226_2e921fd5",
+        "filename": "specs/xena/tripleo-independent-release.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 73,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 8449
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2021-07-28T16:37:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "what do you have in mind Bogdan? \n\nI believe staying in cycle-with-intermediary means we are bound to create all the branches, up to 6 months delay from upstream is the limit i think.\n\nBUt that is the crucial difference that we are bound to create the branch and cannot decide not to. I have included this information on line 28 in the intro",
+      "parentUuid": "ccb73a57_c485e104",
+      "revId": "1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": true
+    },
     {
       "key": {
         "uuid": "3537ca40_cdeb0800",
@@ -192,6 +276,24 @@
       "revId": "1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
       "unresolved": false
+    },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "47c3b0e3_e63bbf95",
+        "filename": "specs/xena/tripleo-independent-release.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 134,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 8449
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2021-07-28T16:37:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "yes you would skip the branches we choose not to create. not sure what your comment is about though are you agreeing? I will reword this a bit based on the conversation with alex earlier see if you like the next version.",
+      "parentUuid": "308f9f32_c8e91e42",
+      "revId": "1baad2c142ca35403e6e4c844d26ba74c6d24e52",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
     }
   ]
 }