openstack
/
tripleo-specs
Code Issues Proposed changes

Corrected RST format (no content change). 

Build is more strict than before - some RST are now flagged
as invalid.

Change-Id: I491b4b949b5ccc559088031f1fa214d1edadb9f7
This commit is contained in:
Cédric Jeanneret 2018-09-12 15:52:49 +02:00
parent 101348fda2
commit 5bfcc67c68
3 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
specs/queens/tripleo-routed-networks-deployment.rst
View File

@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ relay/router host, thus acting exactly like routing switches.
**Problem #2: Neutron's model for a segmented network that spans multiple L2
domains uses the segment object to allow multiple subnets to be assigned to
the same network. This functionality needs to be integrated into the
Undercloud.
Undercloud.**
Possible Solutions, Ideas, or Approaches:

16
specs/rocky/tripleo-ha-utils.rst
View File

@ -84,16 +84,16 @@ evacuate instances after being configured for Instance HA?". And the answer we
want is YES or NO.
* *tripleo-validations*: the most logical place to put this, at least
looking at the name, would be tripleo-validations. By talking with folks
working on it, it came out that the meaning of tripleo-validations project is
not doing disruptive tests. Integrating this stuff would be out of scope.
looking at the name, would be tripleo-validations. By talking with folks
working on it, it came out that the meaning of tripleo-validations project is
not doing disruptive tests. Integrating this stuff would be out of scope.
* *tripleo-quickstart-extras*: apart from the fact that this is not
something meant just for quickstart (the project supports infrared and
"plain" environments as well) even if we initially started there, in the
end, it came out that nobody was looking at the patches since nobody was
able to verify them. The result was a series of reviews stuck forever.
So moving back to extras would be a step backward.
something meant just for quickstart (the project supports infrared and
"plain" environments as well) even if we initially started there, in the
end, it came out that nobody was looking at the patches since nobody was
able to verify them. The result was a series of reviews stuck forever.
So moving back to extras would be a step backward.
Other End User Impact
---------------------

4
specs/stein/0-placeholder.rst
View File

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
=====
=================
Stein placeholder
=====
=================