Added structure for kilo specs

This commit adds a new template for kilo to sit separate from the juno
template. This will allow us to make changes to the template for the
kilo cycle without breaking the unit tests or having to edit all of the
juno specs (a future commit has a proposal for changes to the template).

At the time of posting this, there are no kilo specs in review, so now
would be the time to make changes to the kilo template without causing
headaches.

Change-Id: Id6fffeabcc1eb003adb479c234d3d7ee06dc3a76

doc/source/conf.py

@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ feed_base_url = 'http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs'
 feed_author = 'OpenStack TripleO Team'
 
 exclude_patterns = [
-    '**/template.rst',
+    '**/juno-template.rst',
+    '**/kilo-template.rst',
 ]
 
 # autodoc generation is a bit aggressive and a nuisance when doing heavy

doc/source/index.rst

@@ -4,14 +4,21 @@
 Tripleo Project Specifications
 ==============================
 
-Juno approved specs:
+Kilo Approved Specs:
+
+.. toctree::
+   :glob:
+   :maxdepth: 1
+
+   specs/kilo/*
+
+Juno Approved Specs:
 
 .. toctree::
    :glob:
    :maxdepth: 1
 
    specs/juno/*
-   specs/kilo/*
 
 ==================
 Indices and tables

specs/juno/template.rst

@@ -1 +1 @@
-../template.rst
+../juno-template.rst

specs/kilo-template.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+..
+ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
+ License.
+
+ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
+
+==========================================
+Example Spec - The title of your blueprint
+==========================================
+
+Include the URL of your launchpad blueprint:
+
+https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo
+
+Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything? A single paragraph of
+prose that operators can understand.
+
+Some notes about using this template:
+
+* Your spec should be in ReSTructured text, like this template.
+
+* Please wrap text at 80 columns.
+
+* The filename in the git repository should match the launchpad URL, for
+  example a URL of: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/awesome-thing
+  should be named awesome-thing.rst
+
+* Please do not delete any of the sections in this template.  If you have
+  nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None
+
+* For help with syntax, see http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html
+
+* To test out your formatting, build the docs using tox, or see:
+  http://rst.ninjs.org
+
+
+Problem Description
+===================
+
+A detailed description of the problem:
+
+* For a new feature this might be use cases. Ensure you are clear about the
+  actors in each use case: End User vs Deployer
+
+* For a major reworking of something existing it would describe the
+  problems in that feature that are being addressed.
+
+
+Proposed Change
+===============
+
+Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you
+propose to solve this problem?
+
+If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In
+other words, what's the scope of this effort?
+
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+What other ways could we do this thing? Why aren't we using those? This doesn't
+have to be a full literature review, but it should demonstrate that thought has
+been put into why the proposed solution is an appropriate one.
+
+Security Impact
+---------------
+
+Describe any potential security impact on the system.  Some of the items to
+consider include:
+
+* Does this change touch sensitive data such as tokens, keys, or user data?
+
+* Does this change involve cryptography or hashing?
+
+* Does this change require the use of sudo or any elevated privileges?
+
+* Does this change involve using or parsing user-provided data? This could
+  be directly at the API level or indirectly such as changes to a cache layer.
+
+* Can this change enable a resource exhaustion attack, such as allowing a
+  single API interaction to consume significant server resources? Some examples
+  of this include launching subprocesses for each connection, or entity
+  expansion attacks in XML.
+
+For more detailed guidance, please see the OpenStack Security Guidelines as
+a reference (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Guidelines).  These
+guidelines are a work in progress and are designed to help you identify
+security best practices.  For further information, feel free to reach out
+to the OpenStack Security Group at openstack-security@lists.openstack.org.
+
+Other End User Impact
+---------------------
+
+Are there ways a user will interact with this feature?
+
+Performance Impact
+------------------
+
+Describe any potential performance impact on the system, for example
+how often will new code be called, and is there a major change to the calling
+pattern of existing code.
+
+Examples of things to consider here include:
+
+* A small change in a utility function or a commonly used decorator can have a
+  large impacts on performance.
+
+Other Deployer Impact
+---------------------
+
+Discuss things that will affect how you deploy and configure OpenStack
+that have not already been mentioned, such as:
+
+* What config options are being added? Should they be more generic than
+  proposed (for example a flag that other hypervisor drivers might want to
+  implement as well)? Are the default values ones which will work well in
+  real deployments?
+
+* Is this a change that takes immediate effect after its merged, or is it
+  something that has to be explicitly enabled?
+
+* Please state anything that those doing continuous deployment, or those
+  upgrading from the previous release, need to be aware of. Also describe
+  any plans to deprecate configuration values or features.  For example, if we
+  change the directory name that instances are stored in, how do we handle
+  instance directories created before the change landed?  Do we move them?  Do
+  we have a special case in the code? Do we assume that the operator will
+  recreate all the instances in their cloud?
+
+Developer Impact
+----------------
+
+Discuss things that will affect other developers working on OpenStack.
+
+
+Implementation
+==============
+
+Assignee(s)
+-----------
+
+Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're
+throwing it out there to see who picks it up?
+
+If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the
+primary author and contact.
+
+Primary assignee:
+  <launchpad-id or None>
+
+Other contributors:
+  <launchpad-id or None>
+
+Work Items
+----------
+
+Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be
+done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people,
+but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation.
+
+
+Dependencies
+============
+
+* Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in tripleo, or in other
+  projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
+
+* If this requires functionality of another project that is not currently used
+  by Tripleo (such as the glance v2 API when we previously only required v1),
+  document that fact.
+
+* Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not
+  included in OpenStack? Or does it depend on a specific version of library?
+
+
+Testing
+=======
+
+Please discuss how the change will be tested.
+
+Is this untestable in CI given current limitations (specific hardware /
+software configurations available)? If so, are there mitigation plans (3rd
+party testing, gate enhancements, etc).
+
+
+Documentation Impact
+====================
+
+What is the impact on the docs? Don't repeat details discussed above, but
+please reference them here.
+
+
+References
+==========
+
+Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any
+reference. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your
+references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are:
+
+* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions
+
+* Links to notes from a summit session
+
+* Links to relevant research, if appropriate
+
+* Related specifications as appropriate (e.g.  if it's an EC2 thing, link the EC2 docs)
+
+* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to

tests/test_titles.py

@@ -62,13 +62,20 @@ class TestTitles(testtools.TestCase):
     def _check_titles(self, titles):
         self.assertEqual(TITLES, titles)
 
-    def test_template(self):
+    def _run_template_tests(self, release_name):
-        files = ['specs/template.rst'] + glob.glob('specs/*/*')
+        files = ['specs/%s-template.rst' % release_name] + \
+                glob.glob('specs/%s/*' % release_name)
         for filename in files:
             self.assertTrue(filename.endswith(".rst"),
-                            "spec's file must uses 'rst' extension.")
+                            "specs file must uses 'rst' extension.")
             with open(filename) as f:
                 data = f.read()
             spec = docutils.core.publish_doctree(data)
             titles = self._get_titles(spec)
             self._check_titles(titles)
+
+    def test_juno_templates(self):
+        self._run_template_tests('juno')
+
+    def test_kilo_templates(self):
+        self._run_template_tests('kilo')