Added sample Trove spec template
Added a sample spec template in ReStructured Text format.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c274555829
commit
22b5846a04
154
specs/template.rst
Normal file
154
specs/template.rst
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
|
||||
..
|
||||
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
|
||||
License.
|
||||
|
||||
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
|
||||
|
||||
Sections of this template were taken directly from the Nova spec
|
||||
template at:
|
||||
https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/template.rst
|
||||
..
|
||||
|
||||
This template should be in ReSTructured text. The filename in the git
|
||||
repository should match the launchpad URL, for example a URL of
|
||||
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/awesome-thing should be named
|
||||
awesome-thing.rst.
|
||||
|
||||
Please do not delete any of the sections in this template. If you
|
||||
have nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None
|
||||
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
Title of the blueprint
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
Include the URL of your launchpad blueprint:
|
||||
|
||||
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/example
|
||||
|
||||
Introduction paragraph -- what is the motivation for the blueprint?
|
||||
|
||||
Problem description
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
A detailed description of the problem.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Proposed change
|
||||
===============
|
||||
|
||||
Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you
|
||||
propose to solve this problem?
|
||||
|
||||
If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In
|
||||
other words, what's the scope of this effort?
|
||||
|
||||
Configuration
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
Does this impact any configuration files? If so, which ones?
|
||||
|
||||
Database
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
Does this impact any existing tables? If so, which ones?
|
||||
Are the changes forward and backward compatible?
|
||||
Be sure to include the expected migration process
|
||||
|
||||
Public API
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Does this change any API that an end-user has access to?
|
||||
Are there any exceptions in terms of consistency with other APIs?
|
||||
|
||||
Internal API
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Does this change any internal messages between API and Task Manager or Task Manager to Guest?
|
||||
|
||||
Guest Agent
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
Does this change behavior on the Guest Agent? If so, is it backwards compatible with API and Task Manager?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatives
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
This is an optional section, where it does apply we'd just like a demonstration
|
||||
that some thought has been put into why the proposed approach is the best one.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
Assignee(s)
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're
|
||||
throwing it out there to see who picks it up?
|
||||
|
||||
If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the
|
||||
primary author and contact.
|
||||
|
||||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
<launchpad-id or None>
|
||||
|
||||
Can list additional ids if they intend on doing substantial implementation work
|
||||
on this blueprint.
|
||||
|
||||
Milestones
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Target Milestone for completion:
|
||||
eg. Kilo-2
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be
|
||||
done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people,
|
||||
but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
- Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in Trove, or in other
|
||||
projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
|
||||
|
||||
- Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not
|
||||
included in OpenStack? Or does it depend on a specific version of library?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Testing
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
Please discuss how the change will be tested. We especially want to know what
|
||||
int tests and tempest tests will be added. It is assumed that unit
|
||||
test coverage will be added so that doesn't need to be mentioned
|
||||
explicitly, but discussion of why you think unit tests are sufficient
|
||||
and we don't need to add more tempest tests would need to be included.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
What is the impact on the docs team of this change? Some changes might require
|
||||
donating resources to the docs team to have the documentation updated. Don't
|
||||
repeat details discussed above, but please reference them here.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any
|
||||
references. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your
|
||||
references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are:
|
||||
|
||||
* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions
|
||||
|
||||
* Links to notes from a summit session
|
||||
|
||||
* Links to relevant research, if appropriate
|
||||
|
||||
* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user