Update patch set 1

Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 Workflow+1

(1 comment)

Sorry to hold this up, thanks for the reproduction instructions and the fix, Martin. LGTM

Patch-set: 1
Reviewer: Gerrit User 16643 <16643@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=+2
Label: Workflow=+1
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 16643 2021-01-29 19:13:33 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent d237977d24
commit 908d0ea7f4
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -52,6 +52,24 @@
"revId": "94b1fa594f941cb15f9a3d8d6af18b7527f9c366", "revId": "94b1fa594f941cb15f9a3d8d6af18b7527f9c366",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543", "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": true "unresolved": true
},
{
"key": {
"uuid": "c20c6e6b_830bd1aa",
"filename": "refstack/db/migrations/alembic/utils.py",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 83,
"author": {
"id": 16643
},
"writtenOn": "2021-01-29T19:13:33Z",
"side": 0,
"message": "I see! I was concerned that the prior output was somehow bytes, and the return types may have changed in a newer version of alembic/sqlalchemy; However, it looks like in python2, we were getting a unicode string, and that\u0027s no longer the case with python3 - all strings are the same. There\u0027s some language in the alembic docs that highlights a similar issue, and that gives us a hint: https://alembic.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/cookbook.html#support-non-ascii-migration-scripts-messages-under-python-2",
"parentUuid": "4a5f511d_7da6d471",
"revId": "94b1fa594f941cb15f9a3d8d6af18b7527f9c366",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": true
} }
] ]
} }