refstack

Vendor-facing API for registration of interop-compliance

Go to file

Gerrit User 22873 787b88762c Update patch set 8 Patch Set 8: Code-Review-1 > Patch Set 8: Code-Review+2 > > Do not have any strong opinion between dashes and underscore. > More important to have FS. yeah, me neither until it's consistent, let's merge the interop change first (therefore soft -1 for now) because the frontend is not fully working due to the dash/underscore confusion in the interop repo - https://review.opendev.org/c/osf/interop/+/779098 Patch-set: 8 Reviewer: Gerrit User 22873 <22873@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543> Label: Code-Review=-1	2021-03-07 19:01:22 +00:00
0074bf3b70ca3a539d9a89b00d290d83abe90a82	Update patch set 3	2021-03-06 00:41:59 +00:00

Gerrit User 22873 787b88762c Update patch set 8

Patch Set 8: Code-Review-1

> Patch Set 8: Code-Review+2
> 
> Do not have any strong opinion between dashes and underscore.
> More important to have FS.

yeah, me neither until it's consistent, let's merge the interop change first (therefore soft -1 for now) because the frontend is not fully working due to the dash/underscore confusion in the interop repo - https://review.opendev.org/c/osf/interop/+/779098

Patch-set: 8
Reviewer: Gerrit User 22873 <22873@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=-1

2021-03-07 19:01:22 +00:00

0074bf3b70ca3a539d9a89b00d290d83abe90a82

Update patch set 3

2021-03-06 00:41:59 +00:00