starlingx
/
integ
Code Issues Proposed changes

Merge "Debian: Add kubernetes 1.25.3 remaining patches"

This commit is contained in:
Zuul 2023-02-13 15:54:33 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent 046d3fecfa 101bfe91b6
commit ea7eea3e5c
10 changed files with 1783 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

119
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/Revert-use-subpath-for-coredns-only-for-default-repo.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
From d0120ac7653ab767a76c32e57803155c779667f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:44:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "use subpath for coredns only for default repository"
This reverts commit 38a41e1557649a7cc763bf737779db9aa03ec75e.
Co-authored-by: Jim Gauld <james.gauld@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Aronsky <gleb.aronsky@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
---
cmd/kubeadm/app/constants/constants.go | 2 +-
cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images.go | 5 ---
cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images_test.go | 49 --------------------------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants/constants.go b/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants/constants.go
index 049231d82c4..c57266048a9 100644
--- a/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants/constants.go
+++ b/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants/constants.go
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ const (
CoreDNSDeploymentName = "coredns"
// CoreDNSImageName specifies the name of the image for CoreDNS add-on
- CoreDNSImageName = "coredns"
+ CoreDNSImageName = "coredns/coredns"
// CoreDNSVersion is the version of CoreDNS to be deployed if it is used
CoreDNSVersion = "v1.9.3"
diff --git a/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images.go b/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images.go
index 4c2982d9f6d..bdb61caa373 100644
--- a/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images.go
+++ b/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images.go
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ import (
"k8s.io/klog/v2"
kubeadmapi "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/apis/kubeadm"
- kubeadmapiv1beta2 "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/apis/kubeadm/v1beta2"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants"
kubeadmutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/util"
)
@@ -48,10 +47,6 @@ func GetDNSImage(cfg *kubeadmapi.ClusterConfiguration) string {
if cfg.DNS.ImageRepository != "" {
dnsImageRepository = cfg.DNS.ImageRepository
}
- // Handle the renaming of the official image from "registry.k8s.io/coredns" to "registry.k8s.io/coredns/coredns
- if dnsImageRepository == kubeadmapiv1beta2.DefaultImageRepository {
- dnsImageRepository = fmt.Sprintf("%s/coredns", dnsImageRepository)
- }
// DNS uses an imageTag that corresponds to the DNS version matching the Kubernetes version
dnsImageTag := constants.CoreDNSVersion
diff --git a/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images_test.go b/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images_test.go
index 60927ef9493..e24d4feca23 100644
--- a/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images_test.go
+++ b/cmd/kubeadm/app/images/images_test.go
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ import (
"testing"
kubeadmapi "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/apis/kubeadm"
- kubeadmapiv1beta2 "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/apis/kubeadm/v1beta2"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants"
)
@@ -227,51 +226,3 @@ func TestGetAllImages(t *testing.T) {
}
}
-func TestGetDNSImage(t *testing.T) {
- var tests = []struct {
- expected string
- cfg *kubeadmapi.ClusterConfiguration
- }{
- {
- expected: "foo.io/coredns:v1.9.3",
- cfg: &kubeadmapi.ClusterConfiguration{
- ImageRepository: "foo.io",
- DNS: kubeadmapi.DNS{
- Type: kubeadmapi.CoreDNS,
- },
- },
- },
- {
- expected: kubeadmapiv1beta2.DefaultImageRepository + "/coredns/coredns:v1.9.3",
- cfg: &kubeadmapi.ClusterConfiguration{
- ImageRepository: kubeadmapiv1beta2.DefaultImageRepository,
- DNS: kubeadmapi.DNS{
- Type: kubeadmapi.CoreDNS,
- },
- },
- },
- {
- expected: "foo.io/coredns/coredns:v1.9.3",
- cfg: &kubeadmapi.ClusterConfiguration{
- ImageRepository: "foo.io",
- DNS: kubeadmapi.DNS{
- Type: kubeadmapi.CoreDNS,
- ImageMeta: kubeadmapi.ImageMeta{
- ImageRepository: "foo.io/coredns",
- },
- },
- },
- },
- }
-
- for _, test := range tests {
- actual := GetDNSImage(test.cfg)
- if actual != test.expected {
- t.Errorf(
- "failed to GetDNSImage:\n\texpected: %s\n\t actual: %s",
- test.expected,
- actual,
- )
- }
- }
-}
--
2.25.1

80
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/enable-support-for-kubernetes-to-ignore-isolcpus.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
From 9210e290761240651110318df52fb81199fe46ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 17:46:10 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] enable support for kubernetes to ignore isolcpus
The normal mechanisms for allocating isolated CPUs do not allow
a mix of isolated and exclusive CPUs in the same container. In
order to allow this in *very* limited cases where the pod spec
is known in advance we will add the ability to disable the normal
isolcpus behaviour.
If the file "/etc/kubernetes/ignore_isolcpus" exists, then kubelet
will basically forget everything it knows about isolcpus and just
treat them like regular CPUs.
The admin user can then rely on the fact that CPU allocation is
deterministic to ensure that the isolcpus they configure end up being
allocated to the correct pods.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Safta <daniel.safta@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go | 8 ++++++++
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
index 5a5c4ad9f6f..ae46929c174 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import (
"fmt"
"io/ioutil"
"math"
+ "os"
"strings"
"sync"
"time"
@@ -55,6 +56,13 @@ const cpuManagerStateFileName = "cpu_manager_state"
// get the system-level isolated CPUs
func getIsolcpus() cpuset.CPUSet {
+ // This is a gross hack to basically turn off awareness of isolcpus to enable
+ // isolated cpus to be allocated to pods the same way as non-isolated CPUs.
+ if _, err := os.Stat("/etc/kubernetes/ignore_isolcpus"); err == nil {
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] turning off isolcpus awareness")
+ return cpuset.NewCPUSet()
+ }
+
dat, err := ioutil.ReadFile("/sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated")
if err != nil {
klog.Errorf("[cpumanager] unable to read sysfs isolcpus subdir")
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
index 802e289bfaf..a17a0432bfb 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package cpumanager
import (
"fmt"
+ "os"
"strconv"
v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
@@ -685,6 +686,12 @@ func isKubeInfra(pod *v1.Pod) bool {
// get the isolated CPUs (if any) from the devices associated with a specific container
func (p *staticPolicy) podIsolCPUs(pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container) cpuset.CPUSet {
+ // This is a gross hack to basically turn off awareness of isolcpus to enable
+ // isolated cpus to be allocated to pods the same way as non-isolated CPUs.
+ if _, err := os.Stat("/etc/kubernetes/ignore_isolcpus"); err == nil {
+ return cpuset.NewCPUSet()
+ }
+
// NOTE: This is required for TestStaticPolicyAdd() since makePod() does
// not create UID. We also need a way to properly stub devicemanager.
if len(string(pod.UID)) == 0 {
--
2.25.1

30
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubelet-CFS-quota-throttling-for-non-integer-cpulimit.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
From 2e957044cbcde858abb9c46d177d5cf4ae1407df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boovan Rajendran <boovan.rajendran@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:17:19 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kubelet CFS quota throttling for non integer cpulimit
Signed-off-by: Boovan Rajendran <boovan.rajendran@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go
index 75406dd8564..05366ab6fcb 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go
@@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ func (i *internalContainerLifecycleImpl) PreCreateContainer(pod *v1.Pod, contain
// Disable cgroup CFS throttle at the container level.
// /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/k8s-infra/kubepods/<pod>/<container>/cpu.cfs_quota_us
// /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/k8s-infra/kubepods/<pod>/<container>/cpu.cfs_period_us
- if i.cpuManager.GetCPUPolicy() == "static" && v1qos.GetPodQOS(pod) == v1.PodQOSGuaranteed {
+ // We can only set CpuQuota to -1 if we're allocating the entire CPU.
+ // For fractional CPUs the CpuQuota is needed to enforce the limit.
+ cpuQuantity := container.Resources.Requests[v1.ResourceCPU]
+ fractionalCpuQuantity := cpuQuantity.MilliValue()%1000
+ if i.cpuManager.GetCPUPolicy() == "static" && v1qos.GetPodQOS(pod) == v1.PodQOSGuaranteed && fractionalCpuQuantity == 0 {
containerConfig.Linux.Resources.CpuPeriod = int64(100000)
containerConfig.Linux.Resources.CpuQuota = int64(-1)
}
--
2.25.1

255
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubelet-cpumanager-disable-CFS-quota-throttling.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
From 95e547b2d3d0af6b0f2083c064bcbdbe39716250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sachin Gopala Krishna <saching.krishna@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:19:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] kubelet cpumanager disable CFS quota throttling
This disables CFS CPU quota to avoid performance degradation due to
Linux kernel CFS quota implementation. Note that 4.18 kernel attempts
to solve the CFS throttling problem, but there are reports that it is
not completely effective.
This disables CFS quota throttling for Guaranteed pods for both
parent and container cgroups by writing -1 to cgroup cpu.cfs_quota_us.
Disabling has a dramatic latency improvement for HTTP response times.
This patch is refactored in 1.22.5 due to new internal_container_lifecycle
framework. We leverage the same mechanism to set Linux resources as:
cpu manager: specify the container CPU set during the creation
Co-authored-by: Jim Gauld <james.gauld@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Gopala Krishna <saching.krishna@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go | 7 +++
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/fake_cpu_manager.go | 10 ++++-
pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux.go | 10 +++++
pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux_test.go | 43 ++++++++++---------
.../cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go | 9 ++++
5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
index dde49b6ec8c..df431b06601 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ type Manager interface {
// State returns a read-only interface to the internal CPU manager state.
State() state.Reader
+ // GetCPUPolicy returns the assigned CPU manager policy
+ GetCPUPolicy() string
+
// GetTopologyHints implements the topologymanager.HintProvider Interface
// and is consulted to achieve NUMA aware resource alignment among this
// and other resource controllers.
@@ -314,6 +317,10 @@ func (m *manager) State() state.Reader {
return m.state
}
+func (m *manager) GetCPUPolicy() string {
+ return m.policy.Name()
+}
+
func (m *manager) GetTopologyHints(pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container) map[string][]topologymanager.TopologyHint {
// The pod is during the admission phase. We need to save the pod to avoid it
// being cleaned before the admission ended
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/fake_cpu_manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/fake_cpu_manager.go
index 93369705135..2e277da9c84 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/fake_cpu_manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/fake_cpu_manager.go
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ import (
)
type fakeManager struct {
- state state.State
+ policy Policy
+ state state.State
}
func (m *fakeManager) Start(activePods ActivePodsFunc, sourcesReady config.SourcesReady, podStatusProvider status.PodStatusProvider, containerRuntime runtimeService, initialContainers containermap.ContainerMap) error {
@@ -70,6 +71,10 @@ func (m *fakeManager) State() state.Reader {
return m.state
}
+func (m *fakeManager) GetCPUPolicy() string {
+ return m.policy.Name()
+}
+
func (m *fakeManager) GetExclusiveCPUs(podUID, containerName string) cpuset.CPUSet {
klog.InfoS("GetExclusiveCPUs", "podUID", podUID, "containerName", containerName)
return cpuset.CPUSet{}
@@ -88,6 +93,7 @@ func (m *fakeManager) GetCPUAffinity(podUID, containerName string) cpuset.CPUSet
// NewFakeManager creates empty/fake cpu manager
func NewFakeManager() Manager {
return &fakeManager{
- state: state.NewMemoryState(),
+ policy: &nonePolicy{},
+ state: state.NewMemoryState(),
}
}
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux.go
index 25ff3f13b82..e9ea6bab8dc 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux.go
@@ -182,6 +182,16 @@ func ResourceConfigForPod(pod *v1.Pod, enforceCPULimits bool, cpuPeriod uint64,
// build the result
result := &ResourceConfig{}
if qosClass == v1.PodQOSGuaranteed {
+ // Disable CFS CPU quota to avoid performance degradation due to
+ // Linux kernel CFS throttle implementation.
+ // NOTE: 4.18 kernel attempts to solve CFS throttling problem,
+ // but there are reports that it is not completely effective.
+ // This will configure cgroup CFS parameters at pod level:
+ // /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/k8s-infra/kubepods/<pod>/cpu.cfs_quota_us
+ // /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/k8s-infra/kubepods/<pod>/cpu.cfs_period_us
+ cpuQuota = int64(-1)
+ cpuPeriod = uint64(100000)
+
result.CpuShares = &cpuShares
result.CpuQuota = &cpuQuota
result.CpuPeriod = &cpuPeriod
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux_test.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux_test.go
index 101b21e682a..9b98fb7e1c1 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux_test.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/helpers_linux_test.go
@@ -64,8 +64,9 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPod(t *testing.T) {
burstablePartialShares := MilliCPUToShares(200)
burstableQuota := MilliCPUToQuota(200, int64(defaultQuotaPeriod))
guaranteedShares := MilliCPUToShares(100)
- guaranteedQuota := MilliCPUToQuota(100, int64(defaultQuotaPeriod))
- guaranteedTunedQuota := MilliCPUToQuota(100, int64(tunedQuotaPeriod))
+ guaranteedQuotaPeriod := uint64(100000)
+ guaranteedQuota := int64(-1)
+ guaranteedTunedQuota := int64(-1)
memoryQuantity = resource.MustParse("100Mi")
cpuNoLimit := int64(-1)
guaranteedMemory := memoryQuantity.Value()
@@ -204,8 +205,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: true,
- quotaPeriod: defaultQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedQuota, CpuPeriod: &defaultQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedQuota, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"guaranteed-no-cpu-enforcement": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -218,8 +219,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: false,
- quotaPeriod: defaultQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &defaultQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"guaranteed-with-tuned-quota": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -232,8 +233,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: true,
- quotaPeriod: tunedQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedTunedQuota, CpuPeriod: &tunedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedTunedQuota, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"guaranteed-no-cpu-enforcement-with-tuned-quota": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -246,8 +247,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: false,
- quotaPeriod: tunedQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &tunedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"burstable-partial-limits-with-init-containers": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -309,8 +310,10 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPodWithCustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod(t *testing.T) {
burstablePartialShares := MilliCPUToShares(200)
burstableQuota := MilliCPUToQuota(200, int64(defaultQuotaPeriod))
guaranteedShares := MilliCPUToShares(100)
- guaranteedQuota := MilliCPUToQuota(100, int64(defaultQuotaPeriod))
- guaranteedTunedQuota := MilliCPUToQuota(100, int64(tunedQuotaPeriod))
+ guaranteedQuotaPeriod := uint64(100000)
+ guaranteedQuota := int64(-1)
+ guaranteedTunedQuota := int64(-1)
+
memoryQuantity = resource.MustParse("100Mi")
cpuNoLimit := int64(-1)
guaranteedMemory := memoryQuantity.Value()
@@ -449,8 +452,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPodWithCustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: true,
- quotaPeriod: defaultQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedQuota, CpuPeriod: &defaultQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedQuota, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"guaranteed-no-cpu-enforcement": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -463,8 +466,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPodWithCustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: false,
- quotaPeriod: defaultQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &defaultQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"guaranteed-with-tuned-quota": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -477,8 +480,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPodWithCustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: true,
- quotaPeriod: tunedQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedTunedQuota, CpuPeriod: &tunedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &guaranteedTunedQuota, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
"guaranteed-no-cpu-enforcement-with-tuned-quota": {
pod: &v1.Pod{
@@ -491,8 +494,8 @@ func TestResourceConfigForPodWithCustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod(t *testing.T) {
},
},
enforceCPULimits: false,
- quotaPeriod: tunedQuotaPeriod,
- expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &tunedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
+ quotaPeriod: guaranteedQuotaPeriod,
+ expected: &ResourceConfig{CpuShares: &guaranteedShares, CpuQuota: &cpuNoLimit, CpuPeriod: &guaranteedQuotaPeriod, Memory: &guaranteedMemory},
},
}
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go
index cb7c0cfa543..75406dd8564 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/internal_container_lifecycle_linux.go
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import (
"k8s.io/api/core/v1"
runtimeapi "k8s.io/cri-api/pkg/apis/runtime/v1"
+ v1qos "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/core/v1/helper/qos"
)
func (i *internalContainerLifecycleImpl) PreCreateContainer(pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container, containerConfig *runtimeapi.ContainerConfig) error {
@@ -35,6 +36,14 @@ func (i *internalContainerLifecycleImpl) PreCreateContainer(pod *v1.Pod, contain
}
}
+ // Disable cgroup CFS throttle at the container level.
+ // /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/k8s-infra/kubepods/<pod>/<container>/cpu.cfs_quota_us
+ // /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/k8s-infra/kubepods/<pod>/<container>/cpu.cfs_period_us
+ if i.cpuManager.GetCPUPolicy() == "static" && v1qos.GetPodQOS(pod) == v1.PodQOSGuaranteed {
+ containerConfig.Linux.Resources.CpuPeriod = int64(100000)
+ containerConfig.Linux.Resources.CpuQuota = int64(-1)
+ }
+
if i.memoryManager != nil {
numaNodes := i.memoryManager.GetMemoryNUMANodes(pod, container)
if numaNodes.Len() > 0 {
--
2.25.1

138
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubelet-cpumanager-infra-pods-use-system-reserved-CP.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
From 17a648868f4e0c09d7dda5b157dc2286ff20383c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:48:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kubelet cpumanager infra pods use system reserved CPUs
This assigns system infrastructure pods to the "reserved" cpuset
to isolate them from the shared pool of CPUs.
Infrastructure pods include any pods that belong to the kube-system,
armada, cert-manager, vault, platform-deployment-manager, portieris,
notification, flux-helm or metrics-server namespaces.
The implementation is a bit simplistic, it is assumed that the
"reserved" cpuset is large enough to handle all infrastructure pods
CPU allocations.
This also prevents infrastucture pods from using Guaranteed resources.
Co-authored-by: Jim Gauld <james.gauld@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Aronsky <gleb.aronsky@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Miranda <ThiagoOliveira.Miranda@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaustubh Dhokte <kaustubh.dhokte@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
.../cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go | 19 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
index 14a6e7af9be..341e9f3dffe 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ func (e SMTAlignmentError) Type() string {
return ErrorSMTAlignment
}
+// Define namespaces used by platform infrastructure pods
+var infraNamespaces = [...]string{
+ "kube-system", "armada", "cert-manager", "platform-deployment-manager", "portieris", "vault", "notification", "flux-helm", "metrics-server",
+}
+
// staticPolicy is a CPU manager policy that does not change CPU
// assignments for exclusively pinned guaranteed containers after the main
// container process starts.
@@ -268,6 +273,25 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) updateCPUsToReuse(pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container, c
}
func (p *staticPolicy) Allocate(s state.State, pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container) error {
+ // Process infra pods before guaranteed pods
+ if isKubeInfra(pod) {
+ // Container belongs in reserved pool.
+ // We don't want to fall through to the p.guaranteedCPUs() clause below so return either nil or error.
+ if _, ok := s.GetCPUSet(string(pod.UID), container.Name); ok {
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] static policy: reserved container already present in state, skipping (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s)", pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name)
+ return nil
+ }
+
+ cpuset := p.reserved
+ if cpuset.IsEmpty() {
+ // If this happens then someone messed up.
+ return fmt.Errorf("[cpumanager] static policy: reserved container unable to allocate cpus (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); cpuset=%v, reserved:%v", pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, cpuset, p.reserved)
+ }
+ s.SetCPUSet(string(pod.UID), container.Name, cpuset)
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] static policy: reserved: AddContainer (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); cpuset=%v", pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, cpuset)
+ return nil
+ }
+
if numCPUs := p.guaranteedCPUs(pod, container); numCPUs != 0 {
klog.InfoS("Static policy: Allocate", "pod", klog.KObj(pod), "containerName", container.Name)
// container belongs in an exclusively allocated pool
@@ -384,6 +408,10 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) guaranteedCPUs(pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container) int
if cpuQuantity.Value()*1000 != cpuQuantity.MilliValue() {
return 0
}
+ // Infrastructure pods use reserved CPUs even if they're in the Guaranteed QoS class
+ if isKubeInfra(pod) {
+ return 0
+ }
// Safe downcast to do for all systems with < 2.1 billion CPUs.
// Per the language spec, `int` is guaranteed to be at least 32 bits wide.
// https://golang.org/ref/spec#Numeric_types
@@ -602,6 +630,16 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) generateCPUTopologyHints(availableCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, reu
return hints
}
+// check if a given pod is in a platform infrastructure namespace
+func isKubeInfra(pod *v1.Pod) bool {
+ for _, namespace := range infraNamespaces {
+ if namespace == pod.Namespace {
+ return true
+ }
+ }
+ return false
+}
+
// isHintSocketAligned function return true if numa nodes in hint are socket aligned.
func (p *staticPolicy) isHintSocketAligned(hint topologymanager.TopologyHint, minAffinitySize int) bool {
numaNodesBitMask := hint.NUMANodeAffinity.GetBits()
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
index 80a0c5a9e70..414e5ce144c 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
@@ -939,7 +939,8 @@ func TestStaticPolicyStartWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
-
+ infraPod := makePod("fakePod", "fakeContainer2", "200m", "200m")
+ infraPod.Namespace = "kube-system"
testCases := []staticPolicyTestWithResvList{
{
description: "GuPodSingleCore, SingleSocketHT, ExpectError",
@@ -981,6 +982,22 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
expCPUAlloc: true,
expCSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(4, 5),
},
+ {
+ description: "InfraPod, SingleSocketHT, ExpectAllocReserved",
+ topo: topoSingleSocketHT,
+ numReservedCPUs: 2,
+ reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
+ stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{
+ "fakePod": map[string]cpuset.CPUSet{
+ "fakeContainer100": cpuset.NewCPUSet(2, 3, 6, 7),
+ },
+ },
+ stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(4, 5),
+ pod: infraPod,
+ expErr: nil,
+ expCPUAlloc: true,
+ expCSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
+ },
}
testExcl := true
--
2.25.1

613
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubelet-cpumanager-introduce-concept-of-isolated-CPU.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,613 @@
From e8608eb7c300b6e0503885a4848fafc75f20d909 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:33:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kubelet cpumanager introduce concept of isolated CPUs
This introduces the concept of "isolated CPUs", which are CPUs that
have been isolated at the kernel level via the "isolcpus" kernel boot
parameter.
When starting the kubelet process, two separate sets of reserved CPUs
may be specified. With this change CPUs reserved via
'--system-reserved=cpu' will be used for infrastructure pods while the
isolated CPUs should be reserved via '--kube-reserved=cpu' to cause
kubelet to skip over them for "normal" CPU resource tracking. The
kubelet code will double-check that the specified isolated CPUs match
what the kernel exposes in "/sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated".
A plugin (outside the scope of this commit) will expose the isolated
CPUs to kubelet via the device plugin API.
If a pod specifies some number of "isolcpus" resources, the device
manager will allocate them. In this code we check whether such
resources have been allocated, and if so we set the container cpuset to
the isolated CPUs. This does mean that it really only makes sense to
specify "isolcpus" resources for best-effort or burstable pods, not for
guaranteed ones since that would throw off the accounting code. In
order to ensure the accounting still works as designed, if "isolcpus"
are specified for guaranteed pods, the affinity will be set to the
non-isolated CPUs.
This patch was refactored in 1.21.3 due to upstream API change
node: podresources: make GetDevices() consistent
(commit ad68f9588c72d6477b5a290c548a9031063ac659).
The routine podIsolCPUs() was refactored in 1.21.3 since the API
p.deviceManager.GetDevices() is returning multiple devices with
a device per cpu. The resultant cpuset needs to be the aggregate.
The routine NewStaticPolicy was refactored in 1.22.5, adding a new argument
in its signature: cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string. This change is implies
shifting the new arguments(deviceManager, excludeReserved) with one position
to the right.
Co-authored-by: Jim Gauld <james.gauld@windriver.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Aronsky <gleb.aronsky@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/container_manager_linux.go | 1 +
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go | 35 +++++++-
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go | 20 ++++-
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go | 83 +++++++++++++++++--
.../cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go | 53 +++++++++---
5 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/container_manager_linux.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/container_manager_linux.go
index 44c8cda6c40..a3f92b23c69 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/container_manager_linux.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/container_manager_linux.go
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ func NewContainerManager(mountUtil mount.Interface, cadvisorInterface cadvisor.I
cm.GetNodeAllocatableReservation(),
nodeConfig.KubeletRootDir,
cm.topologyManager,
+ cm.deviceManager,
)
if err != nil {
klog.ErrorS(err, "Failed to initialize cpu manager")
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
index 00c034bc753..5a5c4ad9f6f 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ package cpumanager
import (
"fmt"
+ "io/ioutil"
"math"
+ "strings"
"sync"
"time"
@@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ import (
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/state"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/topology"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpuset"
+ "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/config"
kubecontainer "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/container"
@@ -50,6 +53,25 @@ type policyName string
// cpuManagerStateFileName is the file name where cpu manager stores its state
const cpuManagerStateFileName = "cpu_manager_state"
+// get the system-level isolated CPUs
+func getIsolcpus() cpuset.CPUSet {
+ dat, err := ioutil.ReadFile("/sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated")
+ if err != nil {
+ klog.Errorf("[cpumanager] unable to read sysfs isolcpus subdir")
+ return cpuset.NewCPUSet()
+ }
+
+ // The isolated cpus string ends in a newline
+ cpustring := strings.TrimSuffix(string(dat), "\n")
+ cset, err := cpuset.Parse(cpustring)
+ if err != nil {
+ klog.Errorf("[cpumanager] unable to parse sysfs isolcpus string to cpuset")
+ return cpuset.NewCPUSet()
+ }
+
+ return cset
+}
+
// Manager interface provides methods for Kubelet to manage pod cpus.
type Manager interface {
// Start is called during Kubelet initialization.
@@ -153,7 +175,8 @@ func (s *sourcesReadyStub) AddSource(source string) {}
func (s *sourcesReadyStub) AllReady() bool { return true }
// NewManager creates new cpu manager based on provided policy
-func NewManager(cpuPolicyName string, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, reconcilePeriod time.Duration, machineInfo *cadvisorapi.MachineInfo, specificCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, nodeAllocatableReservation v1.ResourceList, stateFileDirectory string, affinity topologymanager.Store) (Manager, error) {
+func NewManager(cpuPolicyName string, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, reconcilePeriod time.Duration, machineInfo *cadvisorapi.MachineInfo, specificCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, nodeAllocatableReservation v1.ResourceList, stateFileDirectory string, affinity topologymanager.Store, deviceManager devicemanager.Manager) (Manager, error) {
+
var topo *topology.CPUTopology
var policy Policy
var err error
@@ -194,7 +217,15 @@ func NewManager(cpuPolicyName string, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, reconc
// NOTE: Set excludeReserved unconditionally to exclude reserved CPUs from default cpuset.
// This variable is primarily to make testing easier.
excludeReserved := true
- policy, err = NewStaticPolicy(topo, numReservedCPUs, specificCPUs, affinity, cpuPolicyOptions, excludeReserved)
+
+ // isolCPUs is the set of kernel-isolated CPUs. They should be a subset of specificCPUs or
+ // of the CPUs that NewStaticPolicy() will pick if numReservedCPUs is set. It's only in the
+ // argument list here for ease of testing, it's really internal to the policy.
+ isolCPUs := getIsolcpus()
+ policy, err = NewStaticPolicy(topo, numReservedCPUs, specificCPUs, isolCPUs, affinity, cpuPolicyOptions, deviceManager, excludeReserved)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("new static policy error: %v", err)
+ }
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("new static policy error: %w", err)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go
index d553b182e0b..57f3f9a1c97 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ import (
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/state"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/topology"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpuset"
+ "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager"
)
@@ -215,6 +216,7 @@ func makeMultiContainerPod(initCPUs, appCPUs []struct{ request, limit string })
}
func TestCPUManagerAdd(t *testing.T) {
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testExcl := false
testPolicy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(
&topology.CPUTopology{
@@ -230,8 +232,10 @@ func TestCPUManagerAdd(t *testing.T) {
},
0,
cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
+ cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
topologymanager.NewFakeManager(),
nil,
+ testDM,
testExcl)
testCases := []struct {
description string
@@ -482,8 +486,9 @@ func TestCPUManagerAddWithInitContainers(t *testing.T) {
}
testExcl := false
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, testExcl)
mockState := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -638,7 +643,9 @@ func TestCPUManagerGenerate(t *testing.T) {
}
defer os.RemoveAll(sDir)
- mgr, err := NewManager(testCase.cpuPolicyName, nil, 5*time.Second, machineInfo, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), testCase.nodeAllocatableReservation, sDir, topologymanager.NewFakeManager())
+ testDM, err := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
+ mgr, err := NewManager(testCase.cpuPolicyName, nil, 5*time.Second, machineInfo, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), testCase.nodeAllocatableReservation, sDir, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), testDM)
+
if testCase.expectedError != nil {
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), testCase.expectedError.Error()) {
t.Errorf("Unexpected error message. Have: %s wants %s", err.Error(), testCase.expectedError.Error())
@@ -709,6 +716,7 @@ func TestCPUManagerRemove(t *testing.T) {
func TestReconcileState(t *testing.T) {
testExcl := false
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testPolicy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(
&topology.CPUTopology{
NumCPUs: 8,
@@ -727,8 +735,10 @@ func TestReconcileState(t *testing.T) {
},
0,
cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
+ cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
topologymanager.NewFakeManager(),
nil,
+ testDM,
testExcl)
testCases := []struct {
@@ -1234,6 +1244,7 @@ func TestReconcileState(t *testing.T) {
// the following tests are with --reserved-cpus configured
func TestCPUManagerAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
testExcl := false
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testPolicy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(
&topology.CPUTopology{
NumCPUs: 4,
@@ -1248,8 +1259,10 @@ func TestCPUManagerAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
},
1,
cpuset.NewCPUSet(0),
+ cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
topologymanager.NewFakeManager(),
nil,
+ testDM,
testExcl)
testCases := []struct {
description string
@@ -1362,7 +1375,8 @@ func TestCPUManagerHandlePolicyOptions(t *testing.T) {
}
defer os.RemoveAll(sDir)
- _, err = NewManager(testCase.cpuPolicyName, testCase.cpuPolicyOptions, 5*time.Second, machineInfo, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), nodeAllocatableReservation, sDir, topologymanager.NewFakeManager())
+ testDM, err := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
+ _, err = NewManager(testCase.cpuPolicyName, testCase.cpuPolicyOptions, 5*time.Second, machineInfo, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), nodeAllocatableReservation, sDir, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), testDM)
if err == nil {
t.Errorf("Expected error, but NewManager succeeded")
}
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
index 341e9f3dffe..802e289bfaf 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package cpumanager
import (
"fmt"
+ "strconv"
v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
"k8s.io/klog/v2"
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ import (
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/state"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/topology"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpuset"
+ "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager/bitmask"
)
@@ -101,6 +103,10 @@ type staticPolicy struct {
topology *topology.CPUTopology
// set of CPUs that is not available for exclusive assignment
reserved cpuset.CPUSet
+ // subset of reserved CPUs with isolcpus attribute
+ isolcpus cpuset.CPUSet
+ // parent containerManager, used to get device list
+ deviceManager devicemanager.Manager
// If true, default CPUSet should exclude reserved CPUs
excludeReserved bool
// topology manager reference to get container Topology affinity
@@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ var _ Policy = &staticPolicy{}
// NewStaticPolicy returns a CPU manager policy that does not change CPU
// assignments for exclusively pinned guaranteed containers after the main
// container process starts.
-func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reservedCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, affinity topologymanager.Store, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, excludeReserved bool) (Policy, error) {
+func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reservedCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, isolCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, affinity topologymanager.Store, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, deviceManager devicemanager.Manager, excludeReserved bool) (Policy, error) {
+
opts, err := NewStaticPolicyOptions(cpuPolicyOptions)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
@@ -132,6 +139,8 @@ func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reserv
policy := &staticPolicy{
topology: topology,
affinity: affinity,
+ isolcpus: isolCPUs,
+ deviceManager: deviceManager,
excludeReserved: excludeReserved,
cpusToReuse: make(map[string]cpuset.CPUSet),
options: opts,
@@ -158,6 +167,12 @@ func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reserv
klog.InfoS("Reserved CPUs not available for exclusive assignment", "reservedSize", reserved.Size(), "reserved", reserved)
policy.reserved = reserved
+ if !isolCPUs.IsSubsetOf(reserved) {
+ klog.Errorf("[cpumanager] isolCPUs %v is not a subset of reserved %v", isolCPUs, reserved)
+ reserved = reserved.Union(isolCPUs)
+ klog.Warningf("[cpumanager] mismatch isolCPUs %v, force reserved %v", isolCPUs, reserved)
+ }
+
return policy, nil
}
@@ -191,8 +206,9 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) validateState(s state.State) error {
} else {
s.SetDefaultCPUSet(allCPUs)
}
- klog.Infof("[cpumanager] static policy: CPUSet: allCPUs:%v, reserved:%v, default:%v\n",
- allCPUs, p.reserved, s.GetDefaultCPUSet())
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] static policy: CPUSet: allCPUs:%v, reserved:%v, isolcpus:%v, default:%v\n",
+ allCPUs, p.reserved, p.isolcpus, s.GetDefaultCPUSet())
+
return nil
}
@@ -282,10 +298,11 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) Allocate(s state.State, pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Contai
return nil
}
- cpuset := p.reserved
+ cpuset := p.reserved.Clone().Difference(p.isolcpus)
if cpuset.IsEmpty() {
// If this happens then someone messed up.
- return fmt.Errorf("[cpumanager] static policy: reserved container unable to allocate cpus (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); cpuset=%v, reserved:%v", pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, cpuset, p.reserved)
+ return fmt.Errorf("[cpumanager] static policy: reserved container unable to allocate cpus (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); cpuset=%v, reserved:%v, isolcpus:%v", pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, cpuset, p.reserved, p.isolcpus)
+
}
s.SetCPUSet(string(pod.UID), container.Name, cpuset)
klog.Infof("[cpumanager] static policy: reserved: AddContainer (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); cpuset=%v", pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, cpuset)
@@ -329,8 +346,34 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) Allocate(s state.State, pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Contai
}
s.SetCPUSet(string(pod.UID), container.Name, cpuset)
p.updateCPUsToReuse(pod, container, cpuset)
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] guaranteed: AddContainer "+
+ "(namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); numCPUS=%d, cpuset=%v",
+ pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, numCPUs, cpuset)
+ return nil
+ }
+ if isolcpus := p.podIsolCPUs(pod, container); isolcpus.Size() > 0 {
+ // container has requested isolated CPUs
+ if set, ok := s.GetCPUSet(string(pod.UID), container.Name); ok {
+ if set.Equals(isolcpus) {
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] isolcpus container already present in state, skipping (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s)",
+ pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name)
+ return nil
+ } else {
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] isolcpus container state has cpus %v, should be %v (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s)",
+ isolcpus, set, pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name)
+ }
+ }
+ // Note that we do not do anything about init containers here.
+ // It looks like devices are allocated per-pod based on effective requests/limits
+ // and extra devices from initContainers are not freed up when the regular containers start.
+ // TODO: confirm this is still true for 1.20
+ s.SetCPUSet(string(pod.UID), container.Name, isolcpus)
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] isolcpus: AddContainer (namespace: %s, pod UID: %s, pod: %s, container: %s); cpuset=%v",
+ pod.Namespace, string(pod.UID), pod.Name, container.Name, isolcpus)
+ return nil
}
+
// container belongs in the shared pool (nothing to do; use default cpuset)
return nil
}
@@ -640,6 +683,36 @@ func isKubeInfra(pod *v1.Pod) bool {
return false
}
+// get the isolated CPUs (if any) from the devices associated with a specific container
+func (p *staticPolicy) podIsolCPUs(pod *v1.Pod, container *v1.Container) cpuset.CPUSet {
+ // NOTE: This is required for TestStaticPolicyAdd() since makePod() does
+ // not create UID. We also need a way to properly stub devicemanager.
+ if len(string(pod.UID)) == 0 {
+ return cpuset.NewCPUSet()
+ }
+ resContDevices := p.deviceManager.GetDevices(string(pod.UID), container.Name)
+ cpuSet := cpuset.NewCPUSet()
+ for resourceName, resourceDevs := range resContDevices {
+ // this resource name needs to match the isolcpus device plugin
+ if resourceName == "windriver.com/isolcpus" {
+ for devID, _ := range resourceDevs {
+ cpuStrList := []string{devID}
+ if len(cpuStrList) > 0 {
+ // loop over the list of strings, convert each one to int, add to cpuset
+ for _, cpuStr := range cpuStrList {
+ cpu, err := strconv.Atoi(cpuStr)
+ if err != nil {
+ panic(err)
+ }
+ cpuSet = cpuSet.Union(cpuset.NewCPUSet(cpu))
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return cpuSet
+}
+
// isHintSocketAligned function return true if numa nodes in hint are socket aligned.
func (p *staticPolicy) isHintSocketAligned(hint topologymanager.TopologyHint, minAffinitySize int) bool {
numaNodesBitMask := hint.NUMANodeAffinity.GetBits()
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
index 414e5ce144c..1c43df3b85f 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ import (
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/state"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/topology"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpuset"
+ "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager/bitmask"
)
@@ -69,8 +70,9 @@ func (spt staticPolicyTest) PseudoClone() staticPolicyTest {
}
func TestStaticPolicyName(t *testing.T) {
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testExcl := false
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(topoSingleSocketHT, 1, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(topoSingleSocketHT, 1, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, testExcl)
policyName := policy.Name()
if policyName != "static" {
@@ -80,6 +82,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyName(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestStaticPolicyStart(t *testing.T) {
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testCases := []staticPolicyTest{
{
description: "non-corrupted state",
@@ -155,7 +158,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyStart(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
t.Run(testCase.description, func(t *testing.T) {
- p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testCase.excludeReserved)
+ p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, testCase.excludeReserved)
policy := p.(*staticPolicy)
st := &mockState{
@@ -203,7 +206,6 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAdd(t *testing.T) {
largeTopoCPUSet := largeTopoBuilder.Result()
largeTopoSock0CPUSet := largeTopoSock0Builder.Result()
largeTopoSock1CPUSet := largeTopoSock1Builder.Result()
-
// these are the cases which must behave the same regardless the policy options.
// So we will permutate the options to ensure this holds true.
@@ -577,8 +579,10 @@ func runStaticPolicyTestCase(t *testing.T, testCase staticPolicyTest) {
if testCase.topologyHint != nil {
tm = topologymanager.NewFakeManagerWithHint(testCase.topologyHint)
}
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testExcl := false
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), tm, testCase.options, testExcl)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), tm, testCase.options, testDM, testExcl)
+
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -625,6 +629,8 @@ func runStaticPolicyTestCaseWithFeatureGate(t *testing.T, testCase staticPolicyT
}
func TestStaticPolicyReuseCPUs(t *testing.T) {
+ excludeReserved := false
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testCases := []struct {
staticPolicyTest
expCSetAfterAlloc cpuset.CPUSet
@@ -649,7 +655,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyReuseCPUs(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testCase.excludeReserved)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, excludeReserved)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -682,6 +688,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyReuseCPUs(t *testing.T) {
func TestStaticPolicyRemove(t *testing.T) {
excludeReserved := false
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testCases := []staticPolicyTest{
{
description: "SingleSocketHT, DeAllocOneContainer",
@@ -740,7 +747,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyRemove(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, excludeReserved)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, excludeReserved)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -763,6 +770,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyRemove(t *testing.T) {
func TestTopologyAwareAllocateCPUs(t *testing.T) {
excludeReserved := false
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
testCases := []struct {
description string
topo *topology.CPUTopology
@@ -831,7 +839,8 @@ func TestTopologyAwareAllocateCPUs(t *testing.T) {
},
}
for _, tc := range testCases {
- p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(tc.topo, 0, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, excludeReserved)
+ p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(tc.topo, 0, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, excludeReserved)
+
policy := p.(*staticPolicy)
st := &mockState{
assignments: tc.stAssignments,
@@ -864,6 +873,7 @@ type staticPolicyTestWithResvList struct {
topo *topology.CPUTopology
numReservedCPUs int
reserved cpuset.CPUSet
+ isolcpus cpuset.CPUSet
stAssignments state.ContainerCPUAssignments
stDefaultCPUSet cpuset.CPUSet
pod *v1.Pod
@@ -874,6 +884,8 @@ type staticPolicyTestWithResvList struct {
}
func TestStaticPolicyStartWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
+ testExcl := false
testCases := []staticPolicyTestWithResvList{
{
description: "empty cpuset",
@@ -903,11 +915,10 @@ func TestStaticPolicyStartWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
expNewErr: fmt.Errorf("[cpumanager] unable to reserve the required amount of CPUs (size of 0-1 did not equal 1)"),
},
}
- testExcl := false
for _, testCase := range testCases {
t.Run(testCase.description, func(t *testing.T) {
- p, err := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
+ p, err := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, testExcl)
if !reflect.DeepEqual(err, testCase.expNewErr) {
t.Errorf("StaticPolicy Start() error (%v). expected error: %v but got: %v",
testCase.description, testCase.expNewErr, err)
@@ -947,6 +958,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
topo: topoSingleSocketHT,
numReservedCPUs: 1,
reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0),
+ isolcpus: cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{},
stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7),
pod: makePod("fakePod", "fakeContainer2", "8000m", "8000m"),
@@ -959,6 +971,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
topo: topoSingleSocketHT,
numReservedCPUs: 2,
reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
+ isolcpus: cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{},
stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7),
pod: makePod("fakePod", "fakeContainer2", "1000m", "1000m"),
@@ -971,6 +984,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
topo: topoSingleSocketHT,
numReservedCPUs: 2,
reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
+ isolcpus: cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{
"fakePod": map[string]cpuset.CPUSet{
"fakeContainer100": cpuset.NewCPUSet(2, 3, 6, 7),
@@ -987,6 +1001,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
topo: topoSingleSocketHT,
numReservedCPUs: 2,
reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
+ isolcpus: cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{
"fakePod": map[string]cpuset.CPUSet{
"fakeContainer100": cpuset.NewCPUSet(2, 3, 6, 7),
@@ -998,11 +1013,29 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
expCPUAlloc: true,
expCSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
},
+ {
+ description: "InfraPod, SingleSocketHT, Isolcpus, ExpectAllocReserved",
+ topo: topoSingleSocketHT,
+ numReservedCPUs: 2,
+ reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
+ isolcpus: cpuset.NewCPUSet(1),
+ stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{
+ "fakePod": map[string]cpuset.CPUSet{
+ "fakeContainer100": cpuset.NewCPUSet(2, 3, 6, 7),
+ },
+ },
+ stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(4, 5),
+ pod: infraPod,
+ expErr: nil,
+ expCPUAlloc: true,
+ expCSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0),
+ },
}
testExcl := true
+ testDM, _ := devicemanager.NewManagerStub()
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, testCase.isolcpus, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testDM, testExcl)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
--
2.25.1

338
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubelet-cpumanager-keep-normal-containers-off-reserv.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
From a793b871526189690d624379ce4e4e9ec834ccf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:43:43 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kubelet cpumanager keep normal containers off reserved CPUs
When starting the kubelet process, two separate sets of reserved CPUs
may be specified. With this change CPUs reserved via
'--system-reserved=cpu'
or '--kube-reserved=cpu' will be ignored by kubernetes itself. A small
tweak to the default CPU affinity ensures that "normal" Kubernetes
pods won't run on the reserved CPUs.
Co-authored-by: Jim Gauld <james.gauld@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Gopala Krishna <saching.krishna@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go | 6 ++-
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go | 15 ++++++--
pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go | 30 ++++++++++++---
.../cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go | 38 ++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
index 32eabc1340e..00c034bc753 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager.go
@@ -191,7 +191,11 @@ func NewManager(cpuPolicyName string, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, reconc
// exclusively allocated.
reservedCPUsFloat := float64(reservedCPUs.MilliValue()) / 1000
numReservedCPUs := int(math.Ceil(reservedCPUsFloat))
- policy, err = NewStaticPolicy(topo, numReservedCPUs, specificCPUs, affinity, cpuPolicyOptions)
+ // NOTE: Set excludeReserved unconditionally to exclude reserved CPUs from default cpuset.
+ // This variable is primarily to make testing easier.
+ excludeReserved := true
+ policy, err = NewStaticPolicy(topo, numReservedCPUs, specificCPUs, affinity, cpuPolicyOptions, excludeReserved)
+
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("new static policy error: %w", err)
}
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go
index 834d099ac3e..d553b182e0b 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/cpu_manager_test.go
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ func makeMultiContainerPod(initCPUs, appCPUs []struct{ request, limit string })
}
func TestCPUManagerAdd(t *testing.T) {
+ testExcl := false
testPolicy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(
&topology.CPUTopology{
NumCPUs: 4,
@@ -230,7 +231,8 @@ func TestCPUManagerAdd(t *testing.T) {
0,
cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
topologymanager.NewFakeManager(),
- nil)
+ nil,
+ testExcl)
testCases := []struct {
description string
updateErr error
@@ -479,8 +481,9 @@ func TestCPUManagerAddWithInitContainers(t *testing.T) {
},
}
+ testExcl := false
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
mockState := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -705,6 +708,7 @@ func TestCPUManagerRemove(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestReconcileState(t *testing.T) {
+ testExcl := false
testPolicy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(
&topology.CPUTopology{
NumCPUs: 8,
@@ -724,7 +728,8 @@ func TestReconcileState(t *testing.T) {
0,
cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
topologymanager.NewFakeManager(),
- nil)
+ nil,
+ testExcl)
testCases := []struct {
description string
@@ -1228,6 +1233,7 @@ func TestReconcileState(t *testing.T) {
// above test cases are without kubelet --reserved-cpus cmd option
// the following tests are with --reserved-cpus configured
func TestCPUManagerAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
+ testExcl := false
testPolicy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(
&topology.CPUTopology{
NumCPUs: 4,
@@ -1243,7 +1249,8 @@ func TestCPUManagerAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
1,
cpuset.NewCPUSet(0),
topologymanager.NewFakeManager(),
- nil)
+ nil,
+ testExcl)
testCases := []struct {
description string
updateErr error
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
index ff9e6a20e14..14a6e7af9be 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static.go
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ type staticPolicy struct {
topology *topology.CPUTopology
// set of CPUs that is not available for exclusive assignment
reserved cpuset.CPUSet
+ // If true, default CPUSet should exclude reserved CPUs
+ excludeReserved bool
// topology manager reference to get container Topology affinity
affinity topologymanager.Store
// set of CPUs to reuse across allocations in a pod
@@ -110,7 +112,7 @@ var _ Policy = &staticPolicy{}
// NewStaticPolicy returns a CPU manager policy that does not change CPU
// assignments for exclusively pinned guaranteed containers after the main
// container process starts.
-func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reservedCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, affinity topologymanager.Store, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string) (Policy, error) {
+func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reservedCPUs cpuset.CPUSet, affinity topologymanager.Store, cpuPolicyOptions map[string]string, excludeReserved bool) (Policy, error) {
opts, err := NewStaticPolicyOptions(cpuPolicyOptions)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
@@ -125,6 +127,7 @@ func NewStaticPolicy(topology *topology.CPUTopology, numReservedCPUs int, reserv
policy := &staticPolicy{
topology: topology,
affinity: affinity,
+ excludeReserved: excludeReserved,
cpusToReuse: make(map[string]cpuset.CPUSet),
options: opts,
}
@@ -176,7 +179,15 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) validateState(s state.State) error {
}
// state is empty initialize
allCPUs := p.topology.CPUDetails.CPUs()
- s.SetDefaultCPUSet(allCPUs)
+ if p.excludeReserved {
+ // Exclude reserved CPUs from the default CPUSet to keep containers off them
+ // unless explicitly affined.
+ s.SetDefaultCPUSet(allCPUs.Difference(p.reserved))
+ } else {
+ s.SetDefaultCPUSet(allCPUs)
+ }
+ klog.Infof("[cpumanager] static policy: CPUSet: allCPUs:%v, reserved:%v, default:%v\n",
+ allCPUs, p.reserved, s.GetDefaultCPUSet())
return nil
}
@@ -184,11 +195,12 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) validateState(s state.State) error {
// 1. Check if the reserved cpuset is not part of default cpuset because:
// - kube/system reserved have changed (increased) - may lead to some containers not being able to start
// - user tampered with file
- if !p.reserved.Intersection(tmpDefaultCPUset).Equals(p.reserved) {
- return fmt.Errorf("not all reserved cpus: \"%s\" are present in defaultCpuSet: \"%s\"",
- p.reserved.String(), tmpDefaultCPUset.String())
+ if !p.excludeReserved {
+ if !p.reserved.Intersection(tmpDefaultCPUset).Equals(p.reserved) {
+ return fmt.Errorf("not all reserved cpus: \"%s\" are present in defaultCpuSet: \"%s\"",
+ p.reserved.String(), tmpDefaultCPUset.String())
+ }
}
-
// 2. Check if state for static policy is consistent
for pod := range tmpAssignments {
for container, cset := range tmpAssignments[pod] {
@@ -215,6 +227,9 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) validateState(s state.State) error {
}
}
totalKnownCPUs = totalKnownCPUs.UnionAll(tmpCPUSets)
+ if p.excludeReserved {
+ totalKnownCPUs = totalKnownCPUs.Union(p.reserved)
+ }
if !totalKnownCPUs.Equals(p.topology.CPUDetails.CPUs()) {
return fmt.Errorf("current set of available CPUs \"%s\" doesn't match with CPUs in state \"%s\"",
p.topology.CPUDetails.CPUs().String(), totalKnownCPUs.String())
@@ -314,6 +329,9 @@ func (p *staticPolicy) RemoveContainer(s state.State, podUID string, containerNa
cpusInUse := getAssignedCPUsOfSiblings(s, podUID, containerName)
if toRelease, ok := s.GetCPUSet(podUID, containerName); ok {
s.Delete(podUID, containerName)
+ if p.excludeReserved {
+ toRelease = toRelease.Difference(p.reserved)
+ }
// Mutate the shared pool, adding released cpus.
toRelease = toRelease.Difference(cpusInUse)
s.SetDefaultCPUSet(s.GetDefaultCPUSet().Union(toRelease))
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
index 4c10af065a4..80a0c5a9e70 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpumanager/policy_static_test.go
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ type staticPolicyTest struct {
description string
topo *topology.CPUTopology
numReservedCPUs int
+ excludeReserved bool
podUID string
options map[string]string
containerName string
@@ -68,7 +69,8 @@ func (spt staticPolicyTest) PseudoClone() staticPolicyTest {
}
func TestStaticPolicyName(t *testing.T) {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(topoSingleSocketHT, 1, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ testExcl := false
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(topoSingleSocketHT, 1, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
policyName := policy.Name()
if policyName != "static" {
@@ -98,6 +100,15 @@ func TestStaticPolicyStart(t *testing.T) {
stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
expCSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11),
},
+ {
+ description: "empty cpuset exclude reserved",
+ topo: topoDualSocketHT,
+ numReservedCPUs: 2,
+ excludeReserved: true,
+ stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{},
+ stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(),
+ expCSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11),
+ },
{
description: "reserved cores 0 & 6 are not present in available cpuset",
topo: topoDualSocketHT,
@@ -144,7 +155,8 @@ func TestStaticPolicyStart(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
t.Run(testCase.description, func(t *testing.T) {
- p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testCase.excludeReserved)
+
policy := p.(*staticPolicy)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -565,7 +577,8 @@ func runStaticPolicyTestCase(t *testing.T, testCase staticPolicyTest) {
if testCase.topologyHint != nil {
tm = topologymanager.NewFakeManagerWithHint(testCase.topologyHint)
}
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), tm, testCase.options)
+ testExcl := false
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), tm, testCase.options, testExcl)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -636,7 +649,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyReuseCPUs(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testCase.excludeReserved)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -668,6 +681,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyReuseCPUs(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestStaticPolicyRemove(t *testing.T) {
+ excludeReserved := false
testCases := []staticPolicyTest{
{
description: "SingleSocketHT, DeAllocOneContainer",
@@ -726,7 +740,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyRemove(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, excludeReserved)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
@@ -748,6 +762,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyRemove(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestTopologyAwareAllocateCPUs(t *testing.T) {
+ excludeReserved := false
testCases := []struct {
description string
topo *topology.CPUTopology
@@ -816,7 +831,7 @@ func TestTopologyAwareAllocateCPUs(t *testing.T) {
},
}
for _, tc := range testCases {
- p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(tc.topo, 0, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ p, _ := NewStaticPolicy(tc.topo, 0, cpuset.NewCPUSet(), topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, excludeReserved)
policy := p.(*staticPolicy)
st := &mockState{
assignments: tc.stAssignments,
@@ -888,9 +903,11 @@ func TestStaticPolicyStartWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
expNewErr: fmt.Errorf("[cpumanager] unable to reserve the required amount of CPUs (size of 0-1 did not equal 1)"),
},
}
+ testExcl := false
for _, testCase := range testCases {
t.Run(testCase.description, func(t *testing.T) {
- p, err := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ p, err := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
+
if !reflect.DeepEqual(err, testCase.expNewErr) {
t.Errorf("StaticPolicy Start() error (%v). expected error: %v but got: %v",
testCase.description, testCase.expNewErr, err)
@@ -930,7 +947,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
numReservedCPUs: 1,
reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0),
stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{},
- stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7),
+ stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7),
pod: makePod("fakePod", "fakeContainer2", "8000m", "8000m"),
expErr: fmt.Errorf("not enough cpus available to satisfy request"),
expCPUAlloc: false,
@@ -942,7 +959,7 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
numReservedCPUs: 2,
reserved: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1),
stAssignments: state.ContainerCPUAssignments{},
- stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7),
+ stDefaultCPUSet: cpuset.NewCPUSet(2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7),
pod: makePod("fakePod", "fakeContainer2", "1000m", "1000m"),
expErr: nil,
expCPUAlloc: true,
@@ -966,8 +983,9 @@ func TestStaticPolicyAddWithResvList(t *testing.T) {
},
}
+ testExcl := true
for _, testCase := range testCases {
- policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil)
+ policy, _ := NewStaticPolicy(testCase.topo, testCase.numReservedCPUs, testCase.reserved, topologymanager.NewFakeManager(), nil, testExcl)
st := &mockState{
assignments: testCase.stAssignments,
--
2.25.1

50
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubelet-sort-isolcpus-allocation-when-SMT-enabled.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
From ba9ab333c8b7dca5252e604837914293dc232732 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Gauld <James.Gauld@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:06:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kubelet: sort isolcpus allocation when SMT enabled
The existing device manager code returns CPUs as devices in unsorted
order. This numerically sorts isolcpus allocations when SMT/HT is
enabled on the host. This logs SMT pairs, singletons, and algorithm
order details to make the algorithm understandable.
Signed-off-by: Jim Gauld <James.Gauld@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go
index 609da8ed86b..a4b247714f7 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go
@@ -686,7 +686,16 @@ func order_devices_by_sibling(devices sets.String, needed int) ([]string, error)
return cpu_lst[0]
}
}
+ //Make post-analysis of selection algorithm obvious by numerical sorting
+ //the available isolated cpu_id.
+ cpu_ids := make([]int, 0, int(devices.Len()))
for cpu_id := range devices {
+ cpu_id_, _ := strconv.Atoi(cpu_id)
+ cpu_ids = append(cpu_ids, cpu_id_)
+ }
+ sort.Ints(cpu_ids)
+ for _, _cpu_id := range cpu_ids {
+ cpu_id := strconv.Itoa(_cpu_id)
// If we've already found cpu_id as a sibling, skip it.
if _, ok := _iterated_cpu[cpu_id]; ok {
continue
@@ -728,7 +737,9 @@ func order_devices_by_sibling(devices sets.String, needed int) ([]string, error)
}
}
}
- //klog.Infof("needed=%d ordered_cpu_list=%v", needed, dev_lst)
+ //This algorithm will get some attention. Show minimal details.
+ klog.Infof("order_devices_by_sibling: needed=%d, smtpairs=%v, singletons=%v, order=%v",
+ needed, sibling_lst, single_lst, dev_lst)
return dev_lst, nil
}
func smt_enabled() bool {
--
2.25.1

151
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/kubernetes-make-isolcpus-allocation-SMT-aware.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
From c34527067c49c13741484e6977fff9640d9b6efe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:13:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] kubernetes: make isolcpus allocation SMT-aware
Enhance isolcpus support in Kubernetes to allocate isolated SMT
siblings to the same container when SMT/HT is enabled on the host.
As it stands, the device manager code in Kubernetes is not SMT-aware
(since normally it doesn't deal with CPUs). However, StarlingX
exposes isolated CPUs as devices and if possible we want to allocate
all SMT siblings from a CPU core to the same container in order to
minimize cross- container interference due to resource contention
within the CPU core.
The solution is basically to take the list of isolated CPUs and
re-order it so that the SMT siblings are next to each other. That
way the existing resource selection code will allocate the siblings
together. As an optimization, if it is known that an odd number
of isolated CPUs are desired, a singleton SMT sibling will be
inserted into the list to avoid breaking up sibling pairs.
Signed-off-by: Tao Wang <tao.wang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Kumar Sivanandam <rameshkumar.sivanandam@windriver.com>
---
pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go b/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go
index 7b0283d93e4..1fdc2018ab5 100644
--- a/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go
+++ b/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/manager.go
@@ -19,10 +19,13 @@ package devicemanager
import (
"context"
"fmt"
+ "io/ioutil"
"os"
"path/filepath"
"runtime"
"sort"
+ "strconv"
+ "strings"
"sync"
"time"
@@ -38,6 +41,7 @@ import (
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/features"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/checkpointmanager"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/checkpointmanager/errors"
+ "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/cpuset"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/checkpoint"
plugin "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/plugin/v1beta1"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager"
@@ -518,6 +522,75 @@ func (m *ManagerImpl) UpdateAllocatedDevices() {
m.allocatedDevices = m.podDevices.devices()
}
+//Given a list of isolated CPUs in 'devices', and the number of desired CPUs in 'needed',
+//return an ordered list of isolated CPUs such that the first 'needed' CPUs in the list
+//contain as many hyperthread sibling pairs as possible.
+func order_devices_by_sibling(devices sets.String, needed int) ([]string, error) {
+ var dev_lst []string
+ var single_lst []string
+ sibling_lst := make([]string, 0, int(devices.Len()))
+ _iterated_cpu := make(map[string]string)
+ get_sibling := func(cpu string, cpu_lst []string) string {
+ if cpu_lst[0] == cpu {
+ return cpu_lst[1]
+ } else {
+ return cpu_lst[0]
+ }
+ }
+ for cpu_id := range devices {
+ // If we've already found cpu_id as a sibling, skip it.
+ if _, ok := _iterated_cpu[cpu_id]; ok {
+ continue
+ }
+ devPath := fmt.Sprintf("/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%s/topology/thread_siblings_list", cpu_id)
+ dat, err := ioutil.ReadFile(devPath)
+ if err != nil {
+ return dev_lst, fmt.Errorf("Can't read cpu[%s] thread_siblings_list", cpu_id)
+ }
+ cpustring := strings.TrimSuffix(string(dat), "\n")
+ cpu_pair_set, err := cpuset.Parse(cpustring)
+ if err != nil {
+ return dev_lst, fmt.Errorf("Unable to parse thread_siblings_list[%s] string to cpuset", cpustring)
+ }
+ var cpu_pair_lst []string
+ for _, v := range cpu_pair_set.ToSlice() {
+ cpu_pair_lst = append(cpu_pair_lst, strconv.Itoa(v))
+ }
+ sibling_cpu_id := get_sibling(cpu_id, cpu_pair_lst)
+ if _, ok := devices[sibling_cpu_id]; ok {
+ sibling_lst = append(sibling_lst, cpu_id, sibling_cpu_id)
+ _iterated_cpu[sibling_cpu_id] = ""
+ } else {
+ single_lst = append(single_lst, cpu_id)
+ }
+ _iterated_cpu[cpu_id] = ""
+ }
+ if needed%2 == 0 {
+ dev_lst = append(sibling_lst, single_lst...)
+ } else {
+ if len(single_lst) > 1 {
+ _tmp_list := append(sibling_lst, single_lst[1:]...)
+ dev_lst = append(single_lst[0:1], _tmp_list...)
+ } else {
+ if len(single_lst) == 0 {
+ dev_lst = sibling_lst
+ } else {
+ dev_lst = append(single_lst, sibling_lst...)
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ //klog.Infof("needed=%d ordered_cpu_list=%v", needed, dev_lst)
+ return dev_lst, nil
+}
+func smt_enabled() bool {
+ dat, _ := ioutil.ReadFile("/sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/active")
+ state := strings.TrimSuffix(string(dat), "\n")
+ if state == "0" {
+ return false
+ }
+ return true
+}
+
// Returns list of device Ids we need to allocate with Allocate rpc call.
// Returns empty list in case we don't need to issue the Allocate rpc call.
func (m *ManagerImpl) devicesToAllocate(podUID, contName, resource string, required int, reusableDevices sets.String) (sets.String, error) {
@@ -553,7 +626,16 @@ func (m *ManagerImpl) devicesToAllocate(podUID, contName, resource string, requi
// Create a closure to help with device allocation
// Returns 'true' once no more devices need to be allocated.
allocateRemainingFrom := func(devices sets.String) bool {
- for device := range devices.Difference(allocated) {
+ availableDevices := devices.Difference(allocated).List()
+ // If we're dealing with isolcpus and SMT is enabled, reorder to group SMT siblings together.
+ if resource == "windriver.com/isolcpus" && len(devices) > 0 && smt_enabled() {
+ var err error
+ availableDevices, err = order_devices_by_sibling(devices.Difference(allocated), needed)
+ if err != nil {
+ klog.Errorf("error in order_devices_by_sibling: %v", err)
+ }
+ }
+ for _, device := range availableDevices {
m.allocatedDevices[resource].Insert(device)
allocated.Insert(device)
needed--
--
2.25.1

9
kubernetes/kubernetes-1.25.3/debian/deb_folder/patches/series
View File

@ -1 +1,10 @@
kubeadm-create-platform-pods-with-zero-CPU-resources.patch
Revert-use-subpath-for-coredns-only-for-default-repo.patch
kubernetes-make-isolcpus-allocation-SMT-aware.patch
kubelet-sort-isolcpus-allocation-when-SMT-enabled.patch
kubelet-cpumanager-disable-CFS-quota-throttling.patch
kubelet-cpumanager-keep-normal-containers-off-reserv.patch
kubelet-cpumanager-infra-pods-use-system-reserved-CP.patch
kubelet-cpumanager-introduce-concept-of-isolated-CPU.patch
enable-support-for-kubernetes-to-ignore-isolcpus.patch
kubelet-CFS-quota-throttling-for-non-integer-cpulimit.patch