Merge "Remove Service Separation From Draft"
This commit is contained in:
commit
6aa41ffd10
@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
|
||||
OpenStack Service Separation
|
||||
============================
|
||||
|
||||
*Problem description*
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
We need separation between services to mitigate for library conflicts. This way
|
||||
instead of doing "openstack upgrade" we can do "nova upgrade" today, "neutron
|
||||
upgrade" tomorrow and on, and that approach simplifies things tremendously,
|
||||
because potential fallback is both easy and fast, and impact is much lower.
|
||||
|
||||
Biggest problems in upgradeable deployments are dependencies and speed of
|
||||
upgrade. Dependencies means, in case of shared libraries, several services might
|
||||
require same library, but often at different versions between major openstack
|
||||
releases. This will cause conflicts, and require us to do “all or nothing”
|
||||
upgrade. Sometimes we would like to use several maintenance windows to upgrade
|
||||
our deployment one service at the time. Also, we want this maintenance windows to
|
||||
be as short as possible, hence speed of deployment changes.
|
||||
|
||||
User Stories
|
||||
------------
|
||||
* As an OpenStack Operator, I select services to upgrade based upon the new
|
||||
features that have been implemented and bugs fixed. This will lead to different
|
||||
versions of Services running together my deployment. Different Services will be
|
||||
using different versions of system and 3rd party libraries.
|
||||
|
||||
Usage Scenarios Examples
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
* Containers are new way to deploy microservices. Ever heard of Docker? Who
|
||||
didn’t? We want to utilize containers flexibility, speed of deployment, and most
|
||||
importantly, separation of services. With each service having its own library
|
||||
base, we don’t have conflicts, and we can upgrade just one service at the time
|
||||
without disruption of others.
|
||||
|
||||
* Kolla is project which does exactly that – containerize your openstack
|
||||
services. By using Kolla you can utilize flexible container to be configured in a
|
||||
way you ran your services for years, or, for those who want to start openstack
|
||||
adventure, quick and easy way to set up production ready upgradable openstack
|
||||
using ansible.
|
||||
|
||||
Opportunity/Justification
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
Related User Stories
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
*Requirements*
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
* Ability to upgrade 1 OpenStack service, without having to upgrade all OpenStack
|
||||
services
|
||||
* Maintain overall system reliability when only 1 Service is upgraded
|
||||
* Minimal or no downtime during upgrade
|
||||
|
||||
*Gaps*
|
||||
------
|
||||
None currently known.
|
||||
|
||||
*Affected By*
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
Real value can be realized using TripleO to deploy Kolla-based OpenStack. With
|
||||
TripleO’s baremetal and config management, and Kolla containers, deploying large
|
||||
scale, upgradable, production ready OpenStack becomes an achievable use case.
|
||||
|
||||
*External References*
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
Glossary
|
||||
--------
|
||||
None.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user