Update patch set 4
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+2 Workflow+1 (17 comments) multiple comments on security, networking and generall architecture Patch-set: 4
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 13966
Gerrit Code Review
parent
f3a4750f33
commit
44d7454614
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_f32f2b9f",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 13,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "please provide a link for SIP RFC",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_eee7443e",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 15,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "high availability (HA)",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_ee6c249e",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 21,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "an ASCII picture can be helpful to understand what is going on here. \n Access Network Operator Network\n\n +-----+\n | UA1 |\u003c---------\\\n +-----+ \\\n \\\n +-----+ \\-------\u003e+-----+ +-------+\n | UA2 |\u003c--------------------\u003e| SBC |\u003c-----\u003e| proxy |\u003c-- -\n +-----+ /---\u003e+-----+ +-------+\n /\n +-----+ +-----+ /\n | UA3 +---+ NAT |\u003c---/\n +-----+ +-----+\n\n Figure 3: Access Scenario with SBC",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_2ed20c01",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 85,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "please describe more concrete what you mean here, i would avoid using \"ideally\" in this context",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_8e01e06c",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 90,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "large number of concurrent TCP ....",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_0e45d0b1",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 95,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "are you saying that Perimeta must be abel to coexist with VMs which does not have such high reqirements on the data plane?",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_ee4e64c0",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 123,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "(around 60-120 bytes) depending on IPv4/IPv6 header",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_aeee1c89",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 127,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "SR-IOV might not be desireable for some SP use-cases",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_6e9fb403",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 132,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "this requirement is vague to me. Is it possible to formulate this more concrete?",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_ae4a9c81",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 134,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Data center underlay network should be able to provide QoS (e.g. scheduling, policing, ...) \n\n-\u003e It would be helpful to define what QoS functions are expected. There are some blueprints which are looking into QoS features trying to close the gap between today\u0027s openstack implementation and SP requirements on QoS.",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_890c7a3c",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 142,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "only ARP poisoning or generally IP layer security?",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_e91dfe66",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 161,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "define TLB",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_2942063f",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 172,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "are you speaking about multi openstack DC setup? Perimeta should be able to run in multiple locations",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_e962ded7",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 185,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "would IP anycast be able to address your reqirements too?",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_a99b76c8",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 187,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "scheduler",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_a9e9361c",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 197,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "what is SPOF?",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a50d1a3_29de866d",
|
||||
"filename": "usecases/sbc.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 204,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13966
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2015-07-27T13:12:31Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I believe you already mentioned this above",
|
||||
"revId": "9e3b94a463db5c400f54675f85e21d879362c2f8",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue