Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1: (3 comments) Patch-set: 1 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1 \u003c1@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"removed on reply"} Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 4146 \u003c4146@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"Someone else replied on a comment you posted"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa482108be
commit
33404b592a
|
@ -139,6 +139,60 @@
|
|||
"parentUuid": "a09af42f_79c9d4c3",
|
||||
"revId": "646b7f49279b89850aa95671f64ebbbf392fc1d2",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "4a31d33e_1fb9527d",
|
||||
"filename": "nodepool/builder.py",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 712,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-03-07T19:46:00Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "True, and distinct variable names probably would have been a good idea in retrospect. But I think this probably looks more confusing in review than in the code; the two classes handle images differently enough that it wasn\u0027t confusing when working on it. My line of thinking at the time was: They both have an image status, but each just has a different data format for the value.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "a09af42f_79c9d4c3",
|
||||
"revId": "646b7f49279b89850aa95671f64ebbbf392fc1d2",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "01657d80_8bca34d6",
|
||||
"filename": "nodepool/builder.py",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 712,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-03-07T19:46:00Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "True, and distinct variable names probably would have been a good idea in retrospect. But I think this probably looks more confusing in review than in the code; the two classes handle images differently enough that it wasn\u0027t confusing when working on it. My line of thinking at the time was: They both have an image status, but each just has a different data format for the value.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "a09af42f_79c9d4c3",
|
||||
"revId": "646b7f49279b89850aa95671f64ebbbf392fc1d2",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "1c607097_37ccfee6",
|
||||
"filename": "nodepool/builder.py",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 712,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-03-07T19:46:00Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "True, and distinct variable names probably would have been a good idea in retrospect. But I think this probably looks more confusing in review than in the code; the two classes handle images differently enough that it wasn\u0027t confusing when working on it. My line of thinking at the time was: They both have an image status, but each just has a different data format for the value.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "a09af42f_79c9d4c3",
|
||||
"revId": "646b7f49279b89850aa95671f64ebbbf392fc1d2",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue