From f05ef5791ab998232057947533e231cd2c84b70d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerrit User 4146 <4146@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:11:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update patch set 2 Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 (2 comments) Patch-set: 2 Reviewer: Gerrit User 4146 <4146@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543> Label: Code-Review=+2, 1a6f16ba273b18d667b25164a1b4dff72c622a10 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1 \u003c1@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_4146\u003e replied on the change"} --- a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100644 a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db diff --git a/a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db b/a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e599a6cfe --- /dev/null +++ b/a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +{ + "comments": [ + { + "unresolved": true, + "key": { + "uuid": "673acdbc_2ef46af7", + "filename": "nodepool/tests/unit/test_zk.py", + "patchSetId": 2 + }, + "lineNbr": 1368, + "author": { + "id": 4146 + }, + "writtenOn": "2023-06-02T18:11:46Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "The image pause case has a result of `(\u0027NAME\u0027,)` which means that we\u0027ll try to assert None below which doesn\u0027t match the result value above. To avoid confusion should we set the result to `None` instead?\n\nI guess the issue below is that we are calling two different parsing methods and expect different results. Maybe worth a comment at least?", + "range": { + "startLine": 1368, + "startChar": 50, + "endLine": 1368, + "endChar": 63 + }, + "revId": "a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db", + "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543" + }, + { + "unresolved": true, + "key": { + "uuid": "617cb488_beb9791b", + "filename": "nodepool/zk/zookeeper.py", + "patchSetId": 2 + }, + "lineNbr": 760, + "author": { + "id": 4146 + }, + "writtenOn": "2023-06-02T18:11:46Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "Should these two thread start() calls be moved into the _start() method so that if you stop() there is a way to start again without creating a new object?", + "revId": "a21245d5952bfc0f18332dac95ce1559e9b811db", + "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543" + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file