nodepool/5695884bb399672a18626c729f0...

39 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

{
"comments": [
{
"key": {
"uuid": "AAAATH//tXk\u003d",
"filename": "nodepool/nodepool.py",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 995,
"author": {
"id": 4146
},
"writtenOn": "2013-10-10T21:47:26Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Do we need reset provider and image here? Looking at the old image update command in nodepoolcmd.py the values passed in as provider and image appear to be identical to those retrieved here.",
"revId": "5695884bb399672a18626c729f031228c162e844",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": false
},
{
"key": {
"uuid": "AAAATH//tWs\u003d",
"filename": "nodepool/nodepool.py",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 995,
"author": {
"id": 1
},
"writtenOn": "2013-10-10T21:49:36Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Compare to launchNode below -- this means you can pass in a ProviderImage or a TargetImage and this method will correctly get the one it needs (ProviderImage). Otherwise, this would be duplicated in a couple of other methods (where it actually gets more complex because those methods don\u0027t care about ProviderImages otherwise).",
"parentUuid": "AAAATH//tXk\u003d",
"revId": "5695884bb399672a18626c729f031228c162e844",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": false
}
]
}