6d23d20f2f
This is preparation for a later version of ansbile-lint, which finds missing names on blocks. This seems a reasonable rule, and the Ansible manual says [1] Names for blocks have been available since Ansible 2.3. We recommend using names in all tasks, within blocks or elsewhere, for better visibility into the tasks being executed when you run the playbook. This simply adds a name tag for blocks that are missing it. This should have no operational change, but allows us to update the linter in a follow-on change. [1] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/playbooks_blocks.html Change-Id: I92ed4616775650aced352bc9088a07e919f1a25f
34 lines
905 B
YAML
34 lines
905 B
YAML
- name: Check to see if coverage report exists
|
|
stat:
|
|
path: "{{ coverage_output_src }}"
|
|
register: coverage_report_stat
|
|
|
|
- name: Fail if coverage job succeeded and report is not present
|
|
when:
|
|
- zuul_success | default(true) | bool
|
|
- not coverage_report_stat.stat.exists
|
|
fail:
|
|
msg: "Coverage report was not found even though tests succeeded"
|
|
|
|
- name: Collect coverage
|
|
when: coverage_report_stat.stat.exists
|
|
block:
|
|
- name: Collect coverage details output
|
|
synchronize:
|
|
dest: "{{ zuul_executor_dest }}"
|
|
mode: pull
|
|
src: "{{ coverage_output_src }}"
|
|
verify_host: true
|
|
owner: no
|
|
group: no
|
|
|
|
- name: Return artifact to Zuul
|
|
zuul_return:
|
|
data:
|
|
zuul:
|
|
artifacts:
|
|
- name: "Coverage data"
|
|
url: "cover/"
|
|
metadata:
|
|
type: coverage_data
|