Do not update gerrit change cache with old data
An issue was observed with a change series in gerrit when using cherry-pick. The sequence of events on two schedulers was: [2] tell gerrit to merge 1,1 [1] receive a comment-added event for 1,1 [1] perform a gerrit query for 1,1 and receive state=NEW [2] perform the isMerged query for 1,1 and receive state=MERGED [2] update 1,1 in the change cache with is_merged=True [1] update 1,1 in the change cache with is_merged=False This race requires that scheduler #1 perform a gerrit query and store the information locally, while scheduler #2 merges the change and performs a query on the same change and saves it to the change cache, all before scheduler #1 actually saves its data to the change cache. This means that scheduler #1 writes old data to the change cache and flips the is_merged flag back to false. This can occur easily if there are multiple related changes. In this case, scheduler #1 may spend quite some time querying other changes while scheduler #2 only has to query a single change. Once queue processing resumes after the isMerged query completes, scheduler #2 will remove the change at the head, then consider the next change. It will see a change that depends on the first change, and it will see that is_merged on the first change is false, therefore it will remove the dependency. So far, we have described a sequence of events that could happen with any merge strategy, so why does this only appear to be a problem with cherry-pick? That's because right after the comment-added event is sent, gerrit sends the change-merged event. In most merge-modes, that will cause us to query the change a third time and then set the is_merged flag back to true. So there is only a very small window where this race condition can have an effect with most merge modes. But with the cherry-pick mode, the change-merged event is emitted for a new patchset, and it is the change cache entry for this new patchset where is_merged is set to true. The original patchset is left with is_merged=false. To correct this, we update the gerrit driver so that when it is about to update the change cache with data from a query, it compares the ltime of the query data to the ltime already set on the change object. If another scheduler has updated the change cache and that has propagated to our change object, and our data are older than what is on the change object, we will skip the update. The change cache itself uses the zookeeper object version system to ensure that the local change object has the most up-to-date data before writing it to zk. The check described above will work together with this to ensure that, first, if any other scheduler has written the change to zk, we have that data and the query ltime for it; then second, that our query ltime is newer than that before we update our data. Change-Id: Ic206a93ab79242d2cd9d76c006bed67b1f669b31
This commit is contained in:
@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ from tests.base import (
|
||||
okay_tracebacks,
|
||||
simple_layout,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from zuul.zk.change_cache import ChangeKey
|
||||
from zuul.zk.locks import SessionAwareWriteLock, TENANT_LOCK_ROOT
|
||||
from zuul.scheduler import PendingReconfiguration
|
||||
|
||||
@ -456,6 +457,161 @@ class TestScaleOutScheduler(ZuulTestCase):
|
||||
dict(name='project-test2', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
|
||||
], ordered=False)
|
||||
|
||||
@simple_layout('layouts/cherry-pick.yaml')
|
||||
def test_change_cache_ismerged(self):
|
||||
# Test that we don't bump a depending change from the pipeline
|
||||
# due to a race with isMerged.
|
||||
self.executor_server.hold_jobs_in_build = True
|
||||
A = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'A')
|
||||
A.cherry_pick = True
|
||||
B = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'B')
|
||||
B.cherry_pick = True
|
||||
B.setDependsOn(A, 1)
|
||||
A.addApproval('Code-Review', 2)
|
||||
B.addApproval('Code-Review', 2)
|
||||
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(A.addApproval('Approved', 1))
|
||||
self.waitUntilSettled("Change A enqueued")
|
||||
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(B.addApproval('Approved', 1))
|
||||
self.waitUntilSettled("Change B enqueued")
|
||||
|
||||
app = self.createScheduler()
|
||||
app.start()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.scheds), 2)
|
||||
first = self.scheds.first
|
||||
second = app
|
||||
# Wait until they're both ready
|
||||
self.waitUntilSettled("Second scheduler ready")
|
||||
|
||||
# Here's the sequence we need to happen (scheduler id in []):
|
||||
# [2] tell gerrit to merge 1,1
|
||||
# [1] receive a comment-added event for 1,1
|
||||
# [1] perform a gerrit query for 1,1 and receive state=NEW
|
||||
# [1] stop processing right before updating the change cache
|
||||
# [2] perform the isMerged query for 1,1 and receive state=MERGED
|
||||
# [2] update 1,1 in the change cache with is_merged=True
|
||||
# [1] resume processing the change cache update
|
||||
# Then we make sure is_merged does not flip back to false
|
||||
|
||||
# These controls whether scheduler 1 can write updates to the
|
||||
# change cache.
|
||||
update_permitted_event = threading.Event()
|
||||
update_permitted_event.set()
|
||||
waiting_to_update_event = threading.Event()
|
||||
|
||||
# These allow us to stop scheduler 2 between the two queue
|
||||
# items.
|
||||
queue_item_finished = threading.Event()
|
||||
queue_item_resume = threading.Event()
|
||||
queue_item_resume.set()
|
||||
|
||||
# Insert our control into the scheduler 1 change cache
|
||||
s1_cache = first.sched.connections.connections['gerrit']._change_cache
|
||||
orig_s1_set = s1_cache.updateChangeWithRetry
|
||||
|
||||
def s1_set(*args, **kw):
|
||||
if not update_permitted_event.isSet():
|
||||
# We have performed the comment-added query and are
|
||||
# about to write the results.
|
||||
self.log.debug("Waiting to update change cache")
|
||||
# Tell scheduler 2 that we're waiting; we pause so
|
||||
# that it can proceed with its correct data.
|
||||
waiting_to_update_event.set()
|
||||
update_permitted_event.wait()
|
||||
# Now we're going to write old data.
|
||||
self.log.debug("Resuming update to change cache")
|
||||
return orig_s1_set(*args, **kw)
|
||||
s1_cache.updateChangeWithRetry = s1_set
|
||||
|
||||
# Gain control of the review method.
|
||||
s2_conn = second.sched.connections.connections['gerrit']
|
||||
orig_s2_review = s2_conn.review
|
||||
|
||||
def s2_review(*args, **kw):
|
||||
self.log.debug("Review start")
|
||||
# We don't normally automatically emit any post-merge
|
||||
# events in tests in order to keep them simple. But we
|
||||
# need to in this case so that we can trigger a change
|
||||
# query that races the isMerged query. Emit the
|
||||
# comment-added event which is the first thing that gerrit
|
||||
# emits as we merge a change. Normally a change-merged
|
||||
# event would follow, but is not necessary for this test.
|
||||
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(A.getChangeCommentEvent(1))
|
||||
# Wait until query is done
|
||||
self.log.debug("Wait for change-merged query to finish")
|
||||
waiting_to_update_event.wait()
|
||||
# We know the change-merged query has completed with state=NEW
|
||||
self.log.debug("Review resume")
|
||||
# Allow the report to happen, which will cause the state
|
||||
# to change to MERGED for subsequent queries.
|
||||
ret = orig_s2_review(*args, **kw)
|
||||
self.log.debug("Review done")
|
||||
return ret
|
||||
s2_conn.review = s2_review
|
||||
|
||||
# Gain control of the pipeline manager so that we can pause
|
||||
# between processing queue items.
|
||||
s2_gate = second.sched.abide.tenants[
|
||||
'tenant-one'].layout.pipeline_managers['gate']
|
||||
orig_s2_processOneItem = s2_gate._processOneItem
|
||||
|
||||
def s2_processOneItem(*args, **kw):
|
||||
ret = orig_s2_processOneItem(*args, **kw)
|
||||
self.log.debug("Finished queue item")
|
||||
queue_item_finished.set()
|
||||
self.log.debug("Wait for queue item")
|
||||
queue_item_resume.wait()
|
||||
return ret
|
||||
s2_gate._processOneItem = s2_processOneItem
|
||||
|
||||
# Hold the lock on the first scheduler, so the queue
|
||||
# processing happens on the second.
|
||||
with first.sched.run_handler_lock:
|
||||
key = ChangeKey('gerrit', None, 'GerritChange', '1', '1')
|
||||
c1 = s1_cache.get(key)
|
||||
c2 = s1_cache.get(key)
|
||||
|
||||
# Clear events for the start of the interesting part of
|
||||
# the test.
|
||||
queue_item_finished.clear()
|
||||
queue_item_resume.clear()
|
||||
update_permitted_event.clear()
|
||||
self.log.debug("Release held build")
|
||||
self.builds[0].release()
|
||||
self.log.debug("Wait for first queue item to finish")
|
||||
queue_item_finished.wait()
|
||||
self.log.debug("First queue item is finished")
|
||||
|
||||
# Allow the delayed update to take effect (with the old,
|
||||
# pre-merge data) before we process the next queue item.
|
||||
old_uuid = c2.cache_stat.uuid
|
||||
|
||||
update_permitted_event.set()
|
||||
# We wait for the caches to sync to make sure that we
|
||||
# don't trip the conflict detection in the change cache.
|
||||
# If we do, then the change cache will re-query the data.
|
||||
self.log.debug("Wait for caches to sync")
|
||||
for x in iterate_timeout(30, 'caches to sync'):
|
||||
if (c2.cache_stat.uuid != old_uuid and
|
||||
c1.cache_stat.uuid == c2.cache_stat.uuid):
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
# Allow the next item to process
|
||||
self.log.debug("Resume processing second queue item")
|
||||
queue_item_resume.set()
|
||||
self.waitUntilSettled("Merge change A", matcher=[second])
|
||||
|
||||
# Release everything now
|
||||
self.executor_server.hold_jobs_in_build = False
|
||||
self.executor_server.release()
|
||||
|
||||
self.waitUntilSettled("End")
|
||||
self.assertHistory([
|
||||
dict(name='check-job', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1'),
|
||||
dict(name='check-job', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
|
||||
])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(A.data['status'], 'MERGED')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(B.data['status'], 'MERGED')
|
||||
|
||||
@okay_tracebacks('Unterminated string starting at')
|
||||
def test_pipeline_summary(self):
|
||||
# Test that we can deal with a truncated pipeline summary
|
||||
|
@ -43,14 +43,20 @@ class GerritChange(Change):
|
||||
self.zuul_query_ltime = None
|
||||
|
||||
def update(self, data, extra, connection):
|
||||
self.zuul_query_ltime = data.zuul_query_ltime
|
||||
if data.format == data.SSH:
|
||||
self.updateFromSSH(data.data, connection)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.updateFromHTTP(data.data, data.files, data.commentable_files,
|
||||
connection)
|
||||
for k, v in extra.items():
|
||||
setattr(self, k, v)
|
||||
if not (self.zuul_query_ltime and
|
||||
self.zuul_query_ltime > data.zuul_query_ltime):
|
||||
# If our query is older than the existing change data, it
|
||||
# means that another scheduler raced us and won. Skip the
|
||||
# update to avoid having is_merged flap.
|
||||
self.zuul_query_ltime = data.zuul_query_ltime
|
||||
if data.format == data.SSH:
|
||||
self.updateFromSSH(data.data, connection)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.updateFromHTTP(data.data, data.files,
|
||||
data.commentable_files,
|
||||
connection)
|
||||
for k, v in extra.items():
|
||||
setattr(self, k, v)
|
||||
key = ChangeKey(connection.connection_name, None,
|
||||
'GerritChange', str(self.number), str(self.patchset))
|
||||
return key
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user