This is an attempt to formalize our governance structure, but it's not really an attempt to change it. The goal has been to create a governance structure which most closely resembles how we have been operating for the past several years. Change-Id: Ia692631353b5d2ac90ee4f9b9c615e4f7244a24dchanges/39/622439/2
parent
e2887fea70
commit
b47717cc9b
@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
|
||||
Zuul Project Governance
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
The governance of the Zuul project is described below. Changes to
|
||||
this page should remain open for a week and require more positive than
|
||||
negative Code-Review votes from the Maintainers before merging. They
|
||||
should only be approved by the Project Lead.
|
||||
|
||||
Zuul Maintainers
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
The Zuul project is self-governed.
|
||||
|
||||
Decisions regarding the project are made by the Zuul Maintainers.
|
||||
They are a team of people who are familiar with the project as a whole
|
||||
and act as stewards of the project. They have the right to approve or
|
||||
reject proposed changes to the codebase, as well as make other
|
||||
decisions regarding the project.
|
||||
|
||||
The Maintainers are expected to be familiar with the source code,
|
||||
design, operation, and usage of all parts of the Zuul project. When
|
||||
acting in their capacity as Maintainers, they are expected to consider
|
||||
not only their own needs, but those of the entire community.
|
||||
|
||||
Changes to the code, documentation, website, and other project
|
||||
resources held in version control repositories are reviewed and
|
||||
approved by the Maintainers. In general, approval is sought from at
|
||||
least two maintainers before merging a change, but fewer or more
|
||||
reviews may be warranted depending on the change. Factors to consider
|
||||
when reviewing are the complexity of the change, whether it is in
|
||||
accordance with the project design, and whether additional project
|
||||
participants with subject matter expertise should review the change.
|
||||
Maintainers may also reject changes outright, but this is expected to
|
||||
be used sparingly in favor of (or in the process of) redirecting
|
||||
effort toward efforts which can achieve consensus.
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of this review process is two-fold: first, to ensure that
|
||||
changes to the project meet sufficiently high standards so that they
|
||||
improve the project, contribute to furthering its goals, and do not
|
||||
introduce regressive behavior or make the project more difficult to
|
||||
support in the future. Secondly, and just as important, the process
|
||||
also ensures that contributors are aware of the changes to the
|
||||
project. In a distributed environment, reviews are an important part
|
||||
of our collaborative process.
|
||||
|
||||
Project decisions other than those involving on-line review are
|
||||
discussed on the project mailing list. Anyone is welcome and
|
||||
encouraged to participate in these discussions so that input from the
|
||||
broader community is received. As the authority, Maintainers should
|
||||
strive to achieve consensus on any such decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
Changes to the membership of the Maintainers are decided by consensus
|
||||
of the existing maintainers, however, due to their sensitivity, these
|
||||
discussions should occur via private communication among the
|
||||
maintainers under the direction of the Project Lead.
|
||||
|
||||
A large group of Maintainers is important for the health of the
|
||||
project, therefore contributors are encouraged to become involved in
|
||||
all facets of maintenance of the project as part of the process of
|
||||
becoming a Maintainer. Existing Maintainers are expected to encourage
|
||||
new members. There are no artificial limits of the number of
|
||||
Maintainers. The Project Lead will assist any contributor who wishes
|
||||
for guidance in becoming a Maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
Current Zuul Maintainers:
|
||||
|
||||
====================== =============
|
||||
Name Freenode Nick
|
||||
====================== =============
|
||||
Clark Boylan clarkb
|
||||
Clint Byrum SpamapS
|
||||
David Shrewsbury Shrews
|
||||
Ian Wienand ianw
|
||||
James E. Blair corvus
|
||||
Jens Harbott frickler
|
||||
Jeremy Stanley fungi
|
||||
Jesse Keating jlk
|
||||
Joshua Hesketh jhesketh
|
||||
Monty Taylor mordred
|
||||
Paul Belanger pabelanger
|
||||
Ricardo Carrillo Cruz rcarrillocruz
|
||||
Tobias Henkel tobiash
|
||||
====================== =============
|
||||
|
||||
Zuul Project Lead
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
The Maintainers elect a Project Lead to articulate the overall
|
||||
direction of the project and promote consistency among the different
|
||||
areas and aspects of the project. The Project Lead does not have
|
||||
extra rights beyond those of the Maintainers, but does have extra
|
||||
responsibilities. The Project Lead must pay particular attention to
|
||||
the overall design and direction of the project, ensure that
|
||||
Maintainers and other contributors are familiar with that design, and
|
||||
facilitate achieving consensus on difficult issues.
|
||||
|
||||
If the project is unable to achieve consensus on an issue, the Project
|
||||
Lead may poll the Maintainers on the issue, and in the case of a tie,
|
||||
the vote of the Project Lead will be the tie-breaker.
|
||||
|
||||
The Project Lead is elected to a term of one year. The election
|
||||
process shall be a Condorcet election and the candidates shall be
|
||||
self-nominated from among the existing Maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
The Project Lead is James E. Blair (term expires 2020-01-14).
|
||||
|
||||
Zuul-Jobs Maintainers
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The zuul-jobs and zuul-base-jobs repositories contain a standard
|
||||
library of reusable job components which are designed to be used in a
|
||||
wide variety of situations.
|
||||
|
||||
Changes to these repositories require consideriation of the various
|
||||
environments in which the jobs may be used as well as policies which
|
||||
promote the consistency and stability of the components therein, but
|
||||
not necessarily the full scope of Zuul development. To that end,
|
||||
approval rights for changes to these repositories are granted to both
|
||||
the Zuul Maintainers and an additional group known as the Zuul-Jobs
|
||||
Maintainers. The reviewing processes are identical to the rest of the
|
||||
project; membership changes to the Zuul-Jobs Maintainers group are
|
||||
undertaken with consensus of the wider Zuul-Jobs group (not merely the
|
||||
Zuul Maintainers).
|
||||
|
||||
Current Zuul-Jobs Maintainers (in addition to Zuul Maintainers):
|
||||
|
||||
====================== =============
|
||||
Name Freenode Nick
|
||||
====================== =============
|
||||
Andreas Jaeger AJaeger
|
||||
David Moreau Simard dmsimard
|
||||
Mohammed Naser mnaser
|
||||
====================== =============
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue