zuul/tests/unit/test_sos.py

210 lines
8.5 KiB
Python

# Copyright 2021 BMW Group
# Copyright 2021 Acme Gating, LLC
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
# a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
import zuul.model
from tests.base import iterate_timeout, ZuulTestCase
class TestScaleOutScheduler(ZuulTestCase):
tenant_config_file = "config/single-tenant/main.yaml"
# Those tests are testing specific interactions between multiple
# schedulers. They create additional schedulers as necessary and
# start or stop them individually to test specific interactions.
# Using the scheduler_count in addition to create even more
# schedulers doesn't make sense for those tests.
scheduler_count = 1
def test_multi_scheduler(self):
# A smoke test that we can enqueue a change with one scheduler
# and have another one finish the run.
self.executor_server.hold_jobs_in_build = True
A = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'A')
A.addApproval('Code-Review', 2)
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(A.addApproval('Approved', 1))
self.waitUntilSettled()
app = self.createScheduler()
app.start()
self.assertEqual(len(self.scheds), 2)
# Hold the lock on the first scheduler so that only the second
# will act.
with self.scheds.first.sched.run_handler_lock:
self.executor_server.hold_jobs_in_build = False
self.executor_server.release()
self.waitUntilSettled(matcher=[app])
self.assertHistory([
dict(name='project-merge', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1'),
dict(name='project-test1', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1'),
dict(name='project-test2', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1'),
], ordered=False)
def test_config_priming(self):
# Wait until scheduler is primed
self.waitUntilSettled()
first_app = self.scheds.first
initial_max_hold_exp = first_app.sched.globals.max_hold_expiration
layout_state = first_app.sched.tenant_layout_state.get("tenant-one")
self.assertIsNotNone(layout_state)
# Second scheduler instance
second_app = self.createScheduler()
# Change a system attribute in order to check that the system config
# from Zookeeper was used.
second_app.sched.globals.max_hold_expiration += 1234
second_app.config.set("scheduler", "max_hold_expiration", str(
second_app.sched.globals.max_hold_expiration))
second_app.start()
self.waitUntilSettled()
self.assertEqual(first_app.sched.local_layout_state.get("tenant-one"),
second_app.sched.local_layout_state.get("tenant-one"))
# Make sure only the first schedulers issued cat jobs
self.assertIsNotNone(first_app.sched.merger.history.get("cat"))
self.assertIsNone(second_app.sched.merger.history.get("cat"))
for _ in iterate_timeout(
10, "Wait for all schedulers to have the same system config"):
if (first_app.sched.unparsed_abide.ltime
== second_app.sched.unparsed_abide.ltime):
break
# TODO (swestphahl): change this to assertEqual() when we remove
# the smart reconfiguration during config priming.
# Currently the smart reconfiguration during priming of the second
# scheduler will update the system config in Zookeeper and the first
# scheduler updates it's config in return.
self.assertNotEqual(second_app.sched.globals.max_hold_expiration,
initial_max_hold_exp)
def test_reconfigure(self):
# Create a second scheduler instance
app = self.createScheduler()
app.start()
self.assertEqual(len(self.scheds), 2)
for _ in iterate_timeout(10, "Wait until priming is complete"):
old = self.scheds.first.sched.tenant_layout_state.get("tenant-one")
if old is not None:
break
for _ in iterate_timeout(
10, "Wait for all schedulers to have the same layout state"):
layout_states = [a.sched.local_layout_state.get("tenant-one")
for a in self.scheds.instances]
if all(l == old for l in layout_states):
break
self.scheds.first.sched.reconfigure(self.scheds.first.config)
self.waitUntilSettled()
new = self.scheds.first.sched.tenant_layout_state["tenant-one"]
self.assertNotEqual(old, new)
for _ in iterate_timeout(10, "Wait for all schedulers to update"):
layout_states = [a.sched.local_layout_state.get("tenant-one")
for a in self.scheds.instances]
if all(l == new for l in layout_states):
break
layout_uuids = [a.sched.abide.tenants["tenant-one"].layout.uuid
for a in self.scheds.instances]
self.assertTrue(all(l == new.uuid for l in layout_uuids))
self.waitUntilSettled()
def test_change_cache(self):
# Test re-using a change from the change cache.
A = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'A')
B = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'B')
B.setDependsOn(A, 1)
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(B.getPatchsetCreatedEvent(1))
self.waitUntilSettled()
# This has populated the change cache with our change.
app = self.createScheduler()
app.start()
self.assertEqual(len(self.scheds), 2)
# Hold the lock on the first scheduler so that only the second
# will act.
with self.scheds.first.sched.run_handler_lock:
# Enqueue the change again. The second scheduler will
# load the change object from the cache.
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(B.getPatchsetCreatedEvent(1))
self.waitUntilSettled(matcher=[app])
# Each job should appear twice and contain both changes.
self.assertHistory([
dict(name='project-merge', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
dict(name='project-test1', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
dict(name='project-test2', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
dict(name='project-merge', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
dict(name='project-test1', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
dict(name='project-test2', result='SUCCESS', changes='1,1 2,1'),
], ordered=False)
def test_pipeline_summary(self):
# Test that we can deal with a truncated pipeline summary
self.executor_server.hold_jobs_in_build = True
tenant = self.scheds.first.sched.abide.tenants.get('tenant-one')
pipeline = tenant.layout.pipelines['check']
context = self.createZKContext()
def new_summary():
summary = zuul.model.PipelineSummary()
summary._set(pipeline=pipeline)
summary.refresh(context)
return summary
A = self.fake_gerrit.addFakeChange('org/project', 'master', 'A')
self.fake_gerrit.addEvent(A.getPatchsetCreatedEvent(1))
self.waitUntilSettled()
# Check we have a good summary
summary1 = new_summary()
self.assertNotEqual(summary1.status, {})
self.assertTrue(context.client.exists(summary1.getPath()))
# Make a syntax error in the status summary json
summary = new_summary()
summary._save(context, b'{"foo')
# With the corrupt data, we should get an empty status but the
# path should still exist.
summary2 = new_summary()
self.assertEqual(summary2.status, {})
self.assertTrue(context.client.exists(summary2.getPath()))
# Our earlier summary object should use its cached data
summary1.refresh(context)
self.assertNotEqual(summary1.status, {})
self.executor_server.hold_jobs_in_build = False
self.executor_server.release()
self.waitUntilSettled()
# The scheduler should have written a new summary that our
# second object can read now.
summary2.refresh(context)
self.assertNotEqual(summary2.status, {})