2016-03-13 21:23:11 -04:00
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2016 The Android Open Source Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
|
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
|
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
|
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
|
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
|
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
|
limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, minimum-scale=1.0, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes">
|
|
|
|
|
<title>gr-diff-builder</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 17:02:44 -07:00
|
|
|
<script src="../../../bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-lite.min.js"></script>
|
2016-03-13 21:23:11 -04:00
|
|
|
<script src="../../../bower_components/web-component-tester/browser.js"></script>
|
2017-06-02 13:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
<link rel="import" href="../../../test/common-test-setup.html"/>
|
2016-07-14 12:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
<script src="../../../scripts/util.js"></script>
|
2016-06-01 11:41:47 -07:00
|
|
|
<script src="../gr-diff/gr-diff-line.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
|
<script src="../gr-diff/gr-diff-group.js"></script>
|
2016-07-14 12:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
<script src="../gr-diff-highlight/gr-annotation.js"></script>
|
2016-03-13 21:23:11 -04:00
|
|
|
<script src="gr-diff-builder.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-18 10:12:59 -07:00
|
|
|
<link rel="import" href="../../shared/gr-rest-api-interface/mock-diff-response_test.html">
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
<link rel="import" href="gr-diff-builder.html">
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 17:02:44 -07:00
|
|
|
<script>void(0);</script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
<test-fixture id="basic">
|
|
|
|
|
<template>
|
|
|
|
|
<gr-diff-builder>
|
|
|
|
|
<table id="diffTable"></table>
|
|
|
|
|
</gr-diff-builder>
|
|
|
|
|
</template>
|
|
|
|
|
</test-fixture>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
<test-fixture id="div-with-text">
|
|
|
|
|
<template>
|
|
|
|
|
<div>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, suspendisse inceptos vehicula</div>
|
|
|
|
|
</template>
|
|
|
|
|
</test-fixture>
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
<test-fixture id="mock-diff">
|
|
|
|
|
<template>
|
|
|
|
|
<gr-diff-builder view-mode="SIDE_BY_SIDE">
|
|
|
|
|
<table id="diffTable"></table>
|
|
|
|
|
</gr-diff-builder>
|
|
|
|
|
</template>
|
|
|
|
|
</test-fixture>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-13 21:23:11 -04:00
|
|
|
<script>
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('gr-diff-builder tests', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let element;
|
|
|
|
|
let builder;
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
setup(() => {
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
stub('gr-rest-api-interface', {
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
getLoggedIn() { return Promise.resolve(false); },
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const prefs = {
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
line_length: 10,
|
|
|
|
|
show_tabs: true,
|
|
|
|
|
tab_size: 4,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
builder = new GrDiffBuilder({content: []}, {left: [], right: []}, prefs);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-03-13 21:23:11 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('context control buttons', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const section = {};
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {contextGroup: {lines: []}};
|
2016-06-01 15:13:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 lines.
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
2016-06-01 15:13:33 -07:00
|
|
|
line.contextGroup.lines.push('lorem upsum');
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Does not include +10 buttons when there are fewer than 11 lines.
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
let td = builder._createContextControl(section, line);
|
|
|
|
|
let buttons = td.querySelectorAll('gr-button.showContext');
|
2016-06-01 15:13:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(buttons.length, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(buttons[0].textContent, 'Show 10 common lines');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add another line.
|
|
|
|
|
line.contextGroup.lines.push('lorem upsum');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Includes +10 buttons when there are at least 11 lines.
|
|
|
|
|
td = builder._createContextControl(section, line);
|
|
|
|
|
buttons = td.querySelectorAll('gr-button.showContext');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(buttons.length, 3);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(buttons[0].textContent, '+10↑');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(buttons[1].textContent, 'Show 11 common lines');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(buttons[2].textContent, '+10↓');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('newlines 1', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let text = 'abcdef';
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._addNewlines(text, text), text);
|
|
|
|
|
text = 'a'.repeat(20);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._addNewlines(text, text),
|
|
|
|
|
'a'.repeat(10) +
|
|
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.LINE_FEED_HTML +
|
|
|
|
|
'a'.repeat(10));
|
2017-02-21 15:45:46 -08:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('newlines 2', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const text = '<span class="thumbsup">👍</span>';
|
|
|
|
|
const html =
|
|
|
|
|
'<span class="thumbsup">👍</span>';
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._addNewlines(text, html),
|
|
|
|
|
'<span clas' +
|
|
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.LINE_FEED_HTML +
|
|
|
|
|
's="thumbsu' +
|
|
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.LINE_FEED_HTML +
|
|
|
|
|
'p">👍</spa' +
|
|
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.LINE_FEED_HTML +
|
|
|
|
|
'n>');
|
2017-02-21 15:45:46 -08:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('newlines 3', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const text = '01234\t56789';
|
|
|
|
|
const html = '01234<span>\t</span>56789';
|
2017-02-21 15:45:46 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._addNewlines(text, html),
|
|
|
|
|
'01234<span>\t</span>5' +
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.LINE_FEED_HTML +
|
|
|
|
|
'6789');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_addNewlines not called if line_wrapping is true', done => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
builder._prefs = {line_wrapping: true, tab_size: 4, line_length: 50};
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const text = (new Array(52)).join('a');
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const line = {text, highlights: []};
|
|
|
|
|
const newLineStub = sinon.stub(builder, '_addNewlines');
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
builder._createTextEl(line);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
flush(() => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(newLineStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
newLineStub.restore();
|
|
|
|
|
done();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test('_addNewlines called if line_wrapping is true and meets other ' +
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
'conditions', done => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
builder._prefs = {line_wrapping: false, tab_size: 4, line_length: 50};
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const text = (new Array(52)).join('a');
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const line = {text, highlights: []};
|
|
|
|
|
const newLineStub = sinon.stub(builder, '_addNewlines');
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
builder._createTextEl(line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
flush(() => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(newLineStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
newLineStub.restore();
|
|
|
|
|
done();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_createTextEl linewrap with tabs', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const text = _.times(7, _.constant('\t')).join('') + '!';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text, highlights: []};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = builder._createTextEl(line);
|
|
|
|
|
const tabEl = el.querySelector('.contentText > .br');
|
2017-02-21 15:45:46 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.isOk(tabEl);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
|
el.querySelector('.contentText .tab:nth-child(2)').nextSibling,
|
|
|
|
|
tabEl);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('text length with tabs and unicode', () => {
|
2016-04-11 21:17:38 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('12345', 4), 5);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('\t\t12', 4), 10);
|
2016-07-11 17:32:53 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('abc💢123', 4), 7);
|
2016-07-12 13:50:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('abc\t', 8), 8);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('abc\t\t', 10), 20);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('', 10), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('', 10), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('abc\tde', 10), 12);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('abc\tde\t', 10), 20);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._textLength('\t\t\t\t\t', 20), 100);
|
2016-04-11 21:17:38 -04:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('tab wrapper insertion', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const html = 'abc\tdef';
|
|
|
|
|
const wrapper = builder._getTabWrapper(
|
2016-07-12 13:50:26 -07:00
|
|
|
builder._prefs.tab_size - 3,
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
builder._prefs.show_tabs);
|
2016-03-18 16:06:37 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.ok(wrapper);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isAbove(wrapper.length, 0);
|
2016-07-12 13:50:26 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(builder._addTabWrappers(html, builder._prefs.tab_size),
|
|
|
|
|
'abc' + wrapper + 'def');
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.throws(builder._getTabWrapper.bind(
|
|
|
|
|
builder,
|
2016-06-15 11:57:36 -07:00
|
|
|
// using \x3c instead of < in string so gjslint can parse
|
|
|
|
|
'">\x3cimg src="/" onerror="alert(1);">\x3cspan class="',
|
2016-03-17 14:39:42 -04:00
|
|
|
true));
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-03-20 14:14:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('comments', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.BOTH);
|
2016-03-20 14:14:20 -04:00
|
|
|
line.beforeNumber = 3;
|
|
|
|
|
line.afterNumber = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
let comments = {left: [], right: []};
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(builder._getCommentsForLine(comments, line), []);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(builder._getCommentsForLine(comments, line,
|
|
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.Side.LEFT), []);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(builder._getCommentsForLine(comments, line,
|
|
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.Side.RIGHT), []);
|
2016-03-20 14:14:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comments = {
|
|
|
|
|
left: [
|
|
|
|
|
{id: 'l3', line: 3},
|
|
|
|
|
{id: 'l5', line: 5},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
right: [
|
|
|
|
|
{id: 'r3', line: 3},
|
|
|
|
|
{id: 'r5', line: 5},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(builder._getCommentsForLine(comments, line),
|
2017-01-30 12:03:13 -08:00
|
|
|
[{id: 'l3', line: 3, __commentSide: 'left'},
|
|
|
|
|
{id: 'r5', line: 5, __commentSide: 'right'}]);
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(builder._getCommentsForLine(comments, line,
|
2017-01-30 12:03:13 -08:00
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.Side.LEFT), [{id: 'l3', line: 3,
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
__commentSide: 'left'}]);
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(builder._getCommentsForLine(comments, line,
|
2017-01-30 12:03:13 -08:00
|
|
|
GrDiffBuilder.Side.RIGHT), [{id: 'r5', line: 5,
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
__commentSide: 'right'}]);
|
2016-03-22 16:34:03 -04:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('comment thread group creation', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const l3 = {id: 'l3', line: 3, updated: '2016-08-09 00:42:32.000000000',
|
|
|
|
|
__commentSide: 'left'};
|
|
|
|
|
const l5 = {id: 'l5', line: 5, updated: '2016-08-09 00:42:32.000000000',
|
|
|
|
|
__commentSide: 'left'};
|
|
|
|
|
const r5 = {id: 'r5', line: 5, updated: '2016-08-09 00:42:32.000000000',
|
|
|
|
|
__commentSide: 'right'};
|
2016-08-08 16:35:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
builder._comments = {
|
|
|
|
|
meta: {
|
|
|
|
|
changeNum: '42',
|
|
|
|
|
patchRange: {
|
|
|
|
|
basePatchNum: 'PARENT',
|
|
|
|
|
patchNum: '3',
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
path: '/path/to/foo',
|
|
|
|
|
projectConfig: {foo: 'bar'},
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-08 16:35:01 -07:00
|
|
|
left: [l3, l5],
|
|
|
|
|
right: [r5],
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
function checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, patchNum, isOnParent,
|
|
|
|
|
comments) {
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(threadGroupEl.changeNum, '42');
|
2017-02-09 07:34:23 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(threadGroupEl.patchForNewThreads, patchNum);
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(threadGroupEl.path, '/path/to/foo');
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(threadGroupEl.isOnParent, isOnParent);
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(threadGroupEl.projectConfig, {foo: 'bar'});
|
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(threadGroupEl.comments, comments);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
let line = new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.BOTH);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
line.beforeNumber = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
line.afterNumber = 5;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
let threadGroupEl = builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', false, [l5, r5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadGroupEl =
|
|
|
|
|
builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line, GrDiffBuilder.Side.RIGHT);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', false, [r5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadGroupEl =
|
|
|
|
|
builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line, GrDiffBuilder.Side.LEFT);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', true, [l5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
builder._comments.meta.patchRange.basePatchNum = '1';
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadGroupEl = builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', false, [l5, r5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadEl =
|
|
|
|
|
builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line, GrDiffBuilder.Side.LEFT);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadEl, '1', false, [l5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadGroupEl =
|
|
|
|
|
builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line, GrDiffBuilder.Side.RIGHT);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', false, [r5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
builder._comments.meta.patchRange.basePatchNum = 'PARENT';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
line = new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.REMOVE);
|
|
|
|
|
line.beforeNumber = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
line.afterNumber = 5;
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadGroupEl = builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line);
|
2017-03-13 16:40:01 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', true, [l5, r5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
line = new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.ADD);
|
|
|
|
|
line.beforeNumber = 3;
|
|
|
|
|
line.afterNumber = 5;
|
2017-01-27 15:33:08 -08:00
|
|
|
threadGroupEl = builder._commentThreadGroupForLine(line);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
checkThreadGroupProps(threadGroupEl, '3', false, [l3, r5]);
|
2016-03-22 19:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('_isTotal', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
test('is total for add', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const group = new GrDiffGroup(GrDiffGroup.Type.DELTA);
|
|
|
|
|
for (let idx = 0; idx < 10; idx++) {
|
2016-12-21 12:55:21 -08:00
|
|
|
group.addLine(new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.ADD));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(GrDiffBuilder.prototype._isTotal(group));
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('is total for remove', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const group = new GrDiffGroup(GrDiffGroup.Type.DELTA);
|
|
|
|
|
for (let idx = 0; idx < 10; idx++) {
|
2016-12-21 12:55:21 -08:00
|
|
|
group.addLine(new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.REMOVE));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(GrDiffBuilder.prototype._isTotal(group));
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('not total for empty', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const group = new GrDiffGroup(GrDiffGroup.Type.BOTH);
|
2016-12-21 12:55:21 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(GrDiffBuilder.prototype._isTotal(group));
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('not total for non-delta', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const group = new GrDiffGroup(GrDiffGroup.Type.DELTA);
|
|
|
|
|
for (let idx = 0; idx < 10; idx++) {
|
2016-12-21 12:55:21 -08:00
|
|
|
group.addLine(new GrDiffLine(GrDiffLine.Type.BOTH));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(GrDiffBuilder.prototype._isTotal(group));
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('intraline differences', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let el;
|
|
|
|
|
let str;
|
|
|
|
|
let annotateElementSpy;
|
|
|
|
|
let layer;
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function slice(str, start, end) {
|
|
|
|
|
return Array.from(str).slice(start, end).join('');
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
setup(() => {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
el = fixture('div-with-text');
|
|
|
|
|
str = el.textContent;
|
|
|
|
|
annotateElementSpy = sinon.spy(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-07-14 12:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
layer = document.createElement('gr-diff-builder')
|
|
|
|
|
._createIntralineLayer();
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
teardown(() => {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
annotateElementSpy.restore();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotate no highlights', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
text: str,
|
|
|
|
|
highlights: [],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 22:46:20 -07:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The content is unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementSpy.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes.length, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[0], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(str, el.childNodes[0].textContent);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotate with highlights', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
text: str,
|
|
|
|
|
highlights: [
|
|
|
|
|
{startIndex: 6, endIndex: 12},
|
|
|
|
|
{startIndex: 18, endIndex: 22},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const str0 = slice(str, 0, 6);
|
|
|
|
|
const str1 = slice(str, 6, 12);
|
|
|
|
|
const str2 = slice(str, 12, 18);
|
|
|
|
|
const str3 = slice(str, 18, 22);
|
|
|
|
|
const str4 = slice(str, 22);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 22:46:20 -07:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementSpy.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes.length, 5);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[0], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[0].textContent, str0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.notInstanceOf(el.childNodes[1], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[1].textContent, str1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[2], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[2].textContent, str2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.notInstanceOf(el.childNodes[3], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[3].textContent, str3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[4], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[4].textContent, str4);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotate without endIndex', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
text: str,
|
|
|
|
|
highlights: [
|
|
|
|
|
{startIndex: 28},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const str0 = slice(str, 0, 28);
|
|
|
|
|
const str1 = slice(str, 28);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 22:46:20 -07:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementSpy.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes.length, 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[0], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[0].textContent, str0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.notInstanceOf(el.childNodes[1], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[1].textContent, str1);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotate ignores empty highlights', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
text: str,
|
|
|
|
|
highlights: [
|
|
|
|
|
{startIndex: 28, endIndex: 28},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 22:46:20 -07:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementSpy.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes.length, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotate handles unicode', () => {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
// Put some unicode into the string:
|
|
|
|
|
str = str.replace(/\s/g, '💢');
|
|
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const line = {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
text: str,
|
|
|
|
|
highlights: [
|
|
|
|
|
{startIndex: 6, endIndex: 12},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const str0 = slice(str, 0, 6);
|
|
|
|
|
const str1 = slice(str, 6, 12);
|
|
|
|
|
const str2 = slice(str, 12);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 22:46:20 -07:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementSpy.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes.length, 3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[0], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[0].textContent, str0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.notInstanceOf(el.childNodes[1], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[1].textContent, str1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[2], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[2].textContent, str2);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotate handles unicode w/o endIndex', () => {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
// Put some unicode into the string:
|
|
|
|
|
str = str.replace(/\s/g, '💢');
|
|
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const line = {
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
text: str,
|
|
|
|
|
highlights: [
|
|
|
|
|
{startIndex: 6},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const str0 = slice(str, 0, 6);
|
|
|
|
|
const str1 = slice(str, 6);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-25 22:46:20 -07:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
2016-07-13 10:59:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementSpy.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes.length, 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(el.childNodes[0], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[0].textContent, str0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.notInstanceOf(el.childNodes[1], Text);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(el.childNodes[1].textContent, str1);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('tab indicators', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let sandbox;
|
|
|
|
|
let element;
|
|
|
|
|
let layer;
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
setup(() => {
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
sandbox = sinon.sandbox.create();
|
|
|
|
|
element = fixture('basic');
|
|
|
|
|
element._showTabs = true;
|
|
|
|
|
layer = element._createTabIndicatorLayer();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
teardown(() => {
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
sandbox.restore();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('does nothing with empty line', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: ''};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
|
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('does nothing with no tabs', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem ipsum no tabs';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotates tab at beginning', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = '\tlorem upsum';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.callCount, 1);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const args = annotateElementStub.getCalls()[0].args;
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[0], el);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[1], 0, 'offset of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[2], 1, 'length of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.include(args[3], 'tab-indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('does not annotate when disabled', () => {
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
element._showTabs = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const str = '\tlorem upsum';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotates multiple in beginning', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = '\t\tlorem upsum';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.callCount, 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
let args = annotateElementStub.getCalls()[0].args;
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[0], el);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[1], 0, 'offset of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[2], 1, 'length of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.include(args[3], 'tab-indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
args = annotateElementStub.getCalls()[1].args;
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[0], el);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[1], 1, 'offset of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[2], 1, 'length of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.include(args[3], 'tab-indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotates intermediate tabs', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem\tupsum';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.callCount, 1);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const args = annotateElementStub.getCalls()[0].args;
|
Improves visible tabs rendering
This change reverts visible tabs to use the » character. A few different
approaches have been used for rendering these tab indicators:
I: Before the Annotation Pipeline, tab indicators were configured by a
class that was optionally applied to tab elements by the diff
builder. The class was guarded by the show_tabs preference and a CSS
rule created a `::before` pseudo element to insert the character.
(Thus also preventing the » from being copyable text.)
II: When the Annotation Pipeline was implemented, the ordering of layers
called for intraline difference elements being rendered *inside* tab
indicators. As a result, the » indicator would sometimes have a
different background than the intraline difference, looking sloppy.
To solve this, the pseudo element was positioned using absolute,
allowing the pseudo element to consume no horizontal space and and
the intraline background to extend across the entire tab.
III:When performance tuning, it was discovered that the
absolute-positioned tab indicators were positioned incorrectly when
GPU acceleration was hinted for the diff, so the containing tab
elements were made relative.
IV: Continuing performance tuning, the tab indicators seemed to slow
scrolling on very large diffs with tabs. It was mistakenly assumed
(by me) that this was related to the pseudo-elements when it was
actually caused by the thousands of positioning contexts they
created using relative and absolute.
Instead they were modified to use strike-through instead of a pseudo
element, which was more-performant, but less-usable (it looked bad).
With this change, we roll-back the clock a little and solve a core
problem: namely that tab indicators were not annotated inside the
intraline differences. Fixing that, positioning tricks are no-longer
needed to make the background look right.
To do this, we decouple the tab elements (which control tab width) from
the tab indicators (which optionally make tabs visible). This is done
using an annotation layer that inserts tab indicator elements wherever
a tab character is used in the source content, and it does so after
intraline differences have been applied.
Bug: Issue 4441
Change-Id: I4fea2a3a20a7039bfeb746bd1e1c1004e43c4801
2016-08-25 11:31:42 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[0], el);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[1], 5, 'offset of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(args[2], 1, 'length of tab indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.include(args[3], 'tab-indicator');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('trailing whitespace', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let sandbox;
|
|
|
|
|
let element;
|
|
|
|
|
let layer;
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
setup(() => {
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
sandbox = sinon.sandbox.create();
|
|
|
|
|
element = fixture('basic');
|
|
|
|
|
element._showTrailingWhitespace = true;
|
|
|
|
|
layer = element._createTrailingWhitespaceLayer();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
teardown(() => {
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
sandbox.restore();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('does nothing with empty line', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: ''};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
|
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('does nothing with no trailing whitespace', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem ipsum blah blah';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotates trailing spaces', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem ipsum ';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[1], 11);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[2], 3);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotates trailing tabs', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem ipsum\t\t\t';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[1], 11);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[2], 3);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('annotates mixed trailing whitespace', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem ipsum\t \t';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[1], 11);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[2], 3);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('unicode preceding trailing whitespace', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const str = '💢\t';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(annotateElementStub.lastCall.args[2], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('does not annotate when disabled', () => {
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
element._showTrailingWhitespace = false;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const str = 'lorem upsum\t \t ';
|
|
|
|
|
const line = {text: str};
|
|
|
|
|
const el = document.createElement('div');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
el.textContent = str;
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const annotateElementStub =
|
|
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(GrAnnotation, 'annotateElement');
|
2016-11-17 12:03:51 -08:00
|
|
|
layer.annotate(el, line);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(annotateElementStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('rendering', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let content;
|
|
|
|
|
let outputEl;
|
|
|
|
|
let sandbox;
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
setup(done => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
sandbox = sinon.sandbox.create();
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const prefs = {
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
line_length: 10,
|
|
|
|
|
show_tabs: true,
|
|
|
|
|
tab_size: 4,
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
context: -1,
|
|
|
|
|
syntax_highlighting: true,
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
content = [
|
2016-06-09 16:08:04 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
a: ['all work and no play make andybons a dull boy'],
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
b: ['elgoog elgoog elgoog'],
|
2016-06-09 16:08:04 -07:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
ab: [
|
|
|
|
|
'Non eram nescius, Brute, cum, quae summis ingeniis ',
|
|
|
|
|
'exquisitaque doctrina philosophi Graeco sermone tractavissent',
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
],
|
2016-06-09 16:08:04 -07:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
];
|
2016-08-18 16:45:05 -07:00
|
|
|
stub('gr-reporting', {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
time: sandbox.stub(),
|
|
|
|
|
timeEnd: sandbox.stub(),
|
2016-08-18 16:45:05 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
element = fixture('basic');
|
|
|
|
|
outputEl = element.queryEffectiveChildren('#diffTable');
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(element, '_getDiffBuilder', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const builder = new GrDiffBuilder(
|
|
|
|
|
{content}, {left: [], right: []}, prefs, outputEl);
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
sandbox.stub(builder, 'addColumns');
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
builder.buildSectionElement = function(group) {
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const section = document.createElement('stub');
|
|
|
|
|
section.textContent = group.lines.reduce((acc, line) => {
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
return acc + line.text;
|
|
|
|
|
}, '');
|
|
|
|
|
return section;
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
return builder;
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
element.diff = {content};
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, prefs).then(done);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
teardown(() => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
sandbox.restore();
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('reporting', done => {
|
|
|
|
|
const timeStub = element.$.reporting.time;
|
|
|
|
|
const timeEndStub = element.$.reporting.timeEnd;
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(timeStub.calledWithExactly('Diff Total Render'));
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(timeStub.calledWithExactly('Diff Content Render'));
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(timeStub.calledWithExactly('Diff Syntax Render'));
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(timeEndStub.calledWithExactly('Diff Total Render'));
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(timeEndStub.calledWithExactly('Diff Content Render'));
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(timeEndStub.calledWithExactly('Diff Syntax Render'));
|
|
|
|
|
done();
|
2016-08-18 16:45:05 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('renderSection', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let section = outputEl.querySelector('stub:nth-of-type(2)');
|
|
|
|
|
const prevInnerHTML = section.innerHTML;
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
section.innerHTML = 'wiped';
|
2016-06-27 12:19:21 -07:00
|
|
|
element._builder.renderSection(section);
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
section = outputEl.querySelector('stub:nth-of-type(2)');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(section.innerHTML, prevInnerHTML);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('addColumns is called', done => {
|
2016-10-31 14:35:35 -07:00
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, {}).then(done);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(element._builder.addColumns.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('getSectionsByLineRange one line', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const section = outputEl.querySelector('stub:nth-of-type(2)');
|
|
|
|
|
const sections = element._builder.getSectionsByLineRange(1, 1, 'left');
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(sections.length, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(sections[0], section);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-06-09 16:08:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('getSectionsByLineRange over diff', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const section = [
|
2016-06-09 16:08:04 -07:00
|
|
|
outputEl.querySelector('stub:nth-of-type(2)'),
|
|
|
|
|
outputEl.querySelector('stub:nth-of-type(3)'),
|
|
|
|
|
];
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const sections = element._builder.getSectionsByLineRange(1, 2, 'left');
|
2016-06-09 16:08:04 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(sections.length, 2);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(sections[0], section[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(sections[1], section[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-09-29 15:29:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('render-start and render are fired', done => {
|
|
|
|
|
const dispatchEventStub = sinon.stub(element, 'dispatchEvent');
|
|
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, {}).then(() => {
|
|
|
|
|
const firedEventTypes = dispatchEventStub.getCalls()
|
|
|
|
|
.map(c => { return c.args[0].type; });
|
2017-03-01 16:12:11 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.include(firedEventTypes, 'render-start');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.include(firedEventTypes, 'render-content');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.include(firedEventTypes, 'render');
|
2016-09-29 15:29:18 -07:00
|
|
|
done();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-10-10 17:05:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('rendering normal-sized diff does not disable syntax', () => {
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(element.$.syntaxLayer.enabled);
|
2016-10-10 17:05:32 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('rendering large diff disables syntax', done => {
|
2016-10-10 17:05:32 -07:00
|
|
|
// Before it renders, set the first diff line to 500 '*' characters.
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
element.diff.content[0].a = [new Array(501).join('*')];
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
element.addEventListener('render', () => {
|
2016-10-10 17:05:32 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.isFalse(element.$.syntaxLayer.enabled);
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
done();
|
2016-10-10 17:05:32 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const prefs = {
|
2016-10-15 20:22:00 -07:00
|
|
|
line_length: 10,
|
|
|
|
|
show_tabs: true,
|
|
|
|
|
tab_size: 4,
|
|
|
|
|
context: -1,
|
|
|
|
|
syntax_highlighting: true,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, prefs);
|
2016-10-10 17:05:32 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2017-06-05 09:18:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test('cancel', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const processorCancelStub = sandbox.stub(element.$.processor, 'cancel');
|
|
|
|
|
const syntaxCancelStub = sandbox.stub(element.$.syntaxLayer, 'cancel');
|
|
|
|
|
element.cancel();
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(processorCancelStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.isTrue(syntaxCancelStub.called);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-05-23 15:31:21 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
suite('mock-diff', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let element;
|
|
|
|
|
let builder;
|
|
|
|
|
let diff;
|
|
|
|
|
let prefs;
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
setup(done => {
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
element = fixture('mock-diff');
|
|
|
|
|
diff = document.createElement('mock-diff-response').diffResponse;
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
element.diff = diff;
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
prefs = {
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
line_length: 80,
|
|
|
|
|
show_tabs: true,
|
|
|
|
|
tab_size: 4,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, prefs).then(() => {
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
builder = element._builder;
|
|
|
|
|
done();
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('getContentByLine', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let actual;
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actual = builder.getContentByLine(2, 'left');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(actual.textContent, diff.content[0].ab[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actual = builder.getContentByLine(2, 'right');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(actual.textContent, diff.content[0].ab[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actual = builder.getContentByLine(5, 'left');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(actual.textContent, diff.content[2].ab[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actual = builder.getContentByLine(5, 'right');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(actual.textContent, diff.content[1].b[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('findLinesByRange', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const lines = [];
|
|
|
|
|
const elems = [];
|
|
|
|
|
const start = 6;
|
|
|
|
|
const end = 10;
|
|
|
|
|
const count = end - start + 1;
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
builder.findLinesByRange(start, end, 'right', lines, elems);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(lines.length, count);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(elems.length, count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(lines[i], GrDiffLine);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(lines[i].afterNumber, start + i);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.instanceOf(elems[i], HTMLElement);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(lines[i].text, elems[i].textContent);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_renderContentByRange', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const spy = sinon.spy(builder, '_createTextEl');
|
|
|
|
|
const start = 9;
|
|
|
|
|
const end = 14;
|
|
|
|
|
const count = end - start + 1;
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
builder._renderContentByRange(start, end, 'left');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(spy.callCount, count);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
spy.getCalls().forEach((call, i) => {
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(call.args[0].beforeNumber, start + i);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spy.restore();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_getNextContentOnSide side-by-side left', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const startElem = builder.getContentByLine(5, 'left',
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
element.$.diffTable);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const expectedStartString = diff.content[2].ab[0];
|
|
|
|
|
const expectedNextString = diff.content[2].ab[1];
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(startElem.textContent, expectedStartString);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const nextElem = builder._getNextContentOnSide(startElem,
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
'left');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(nextElem.textContent, expectedNextString);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_getNextContentOnSide side-by-side right', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const startElem = builder.getContentByLine(5, 'right',
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
element.$.diffTable);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const expectedStartString = diff.content[1].b[0];
|
|
|
|
|
const expectedNextString = diff.content[1].b[1];
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(startElem.textContent, expectedStartString);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const nextElem = builder._getNextContentOnSide(startElem,
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
'right');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(nextElem.textContent, expectedNextString);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_getNextContentOnSide unified left', done => {
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
// Re-render as unified:
|
|
|
|
|
element.viewMode = 'UNIFIED_DIFF';
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, prefs).then(() => {
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
builder = element._builder;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const startElem = builder.getContentByLine(5, 'left',
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
element.$.diffTable);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const expectedStartString = diff.content[2].ab[0];
|
|
|
|
|
const expectedNextString = diff.content[2].ab[1];
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(startElem.textContent, expectedStartString);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const nextElem = builder._getNextContentOnSide(startElem,
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
'left');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(nextElem.textContent, expectedNextString);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_getNextContentOnSide unified right', done => {
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
// Re-render as unified:
|
|
|
|
|
element.viewMode = 'UNIFIED_DIFF';
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
element.render({left: [], right: []}, prefs).then(() => {
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
builder = element._builder;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const startElem = builder.getContentByLine(5, 'right',
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
element.$.diffTable);
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const expectedStartString = diff.content[1].b[0];
|
|
|
|
|
const expectedNextString = diff.content[1].b[1];
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(startElem.textContent, expectedStartString);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
const nextElem = builder._getNextContentOnSide(startElem,
|
2016-07-21 22:19:25 -07:00
|
|
|
'right');
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(nextElem.textContent, expectedNextString);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done();
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2017-01-30 16:42:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
test('_escapeHTML', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
let input = '<script>alert("XSS");<' + '/script>';
|
|
|
|
|
let expected = '<script>alert("XSS");' +
|
2017-01-30 16:42:46 -08:00
|
|
|
'</script>';
|
2017-05-16 13:45:17 -07:00
|
|
|
let result = GrDiffBuilder.prototype._escapeHTML(input);
|
2017-01-30 16:42:46 -08:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(result, expected);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
input = '& < > " \' / `';
|
2017-02-01 14:41:24 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// \u0026 is an ampersand. This is being used here instead of &
|
|
|
|
|
// because of the gjslinter.
|
|
|
|
|
expected = '\u0026amp; \u0026lt; \u0026gt; \u0026quot;' +
|
|
|
|
|
' \u0026#39; \u0026#x2F; \u0026#96;';
|
2017-01-30 16:42:46 -08:00
|
|
|
result = GrDiffBuilder.prototype._escapeHTML(input);
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(result, expected);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2016-07-15 17:08:22 -07:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-03-13 21:23:11 -04:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
</script>
|