Polish the Introduction of the Four Opens book
The purpose of this patch is to edit the 'Introduction' section of the Four Opens book. It is the first change of a series that will go through the entire book to make the text read more neutral and cohesive to make it ready to publish. Change-Id: I7829fdfa3cca374032cc99cac4cc3479e694b877 Signed-off-by: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bf814f232
commit
0f3e8f2a06
@ -2,21 +2,51 @@
|
||||
Introduction
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
Where do the Four Opens originate from? They came from a need to do things
|
||||
differently.
|
||||
|
||||
This book is for the lost souls to guide them through the intricacies,
|
||||
challenges and joys of building, maintaining, supporting and participating in
|
||||
well balanced and sustainable open source communities.
|
||||
|
||||
Open source has become a loaded term over the past few decades while many
|
||||
people still associate it with free software. While the access to source code
|
||||
is directly implied in the term, under various license options that this book
|
||||
will not discuss, the focus is shifting towards how the software gets created
|
||||
by communities that are formed by a group of individuals who need to be able
|
||||
to work together in an open environment while they often employed by companies
|
||||
that are competitors.
|
||||
|
||||
What is the key to success to make open collaboration successful? How can you
|
||||
participate in a community and help make it thrive? What are the most
|
||||
important principles to follow during your journey?
|
||||
|
||||
This book will give you answers to these questions by describing a set of
|
||||
guiding principles called The Four Opens that was originally defined by the
|
||||
OpenStack community and helped them as well as other projects to thrive in the
|
||||
open source ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
History
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
Before jumping in the middle of The Four Opens let’s have a short tour in
|
||||
history to understand where the need and the ideas came from. Originally, they
|
||||
came from a need to do things differently.
|
||||
|
||||
Free software started in the 80’s by defining four (initially three)
|
||||
freedoms [#fourfreedoms]_ that any free software should grant its
|
||||
users. Freedom
|
||||
0 was the freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose. Freedom 1
|
||||
was the freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your
|
||||
computing as you wish. Freedom 2 was the freedom to redistribute copies so you
|
||||
can help your neighbor. Freedom 3 was the freedom to distribute copies of your
|
||||
modified versions to others. Those freedoms made you free to improve the
|
||||
program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole
|
||||
community benefits. But free software did not mandate anything about how the
|
||||
software was to be built to actually encourage this collaboration across
|
||||
boundaries that would result in benefiting the whole community.
|
||||
users:
|
||||
|
||||
* Freedom 0: freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose
|
||||
* Freedom 1: freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does
|
||||
your computing as you wish
|
||||
* Freedom 2: freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor
|
||||
* Freedom 3: freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
|
||||
|
||||
These freedoms made the participants free to improve the program, and release
|
||||
their improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits. But
|
||||
free software did not mandate anything about how the software was to be built
|
||||
to actually encourage this collaboration across boundaries that would result
|
||||
in benefiting the whole community.
|
||||
|
||||
When open source was defined in 1998, it focused on a specific angle (the one
|
||||
that mattered the most to businesses), which is the availability and
|
||||
@ -41,39 +71,42 @@ improvement (like security or scalability) that the controlling entity would
|
||||
prefer to keep for its Enterprise edition. All this control ultimately hurts
|
||||
the adoption and the success of the software.
|
||||
|
||||
OpenStack was started with the belief that a community of equals, working
|
||||
together in an open collaboration, would produce better software, more aligned
|
||||
to the needs of its users and more largely adopted. It was therefore started
|
||||
from day 0 as an open collaboration willing to include as many individuals and
|
||||
organizations as possible, on a level playing field, with everyone involved in
|
||||
designing the solution. This was relatively novel: while a few venerable
|
||||
projects like the Linux kernel were set up and perdured as truly open
|
||||
collaborations, most new projects in 2010 were just owned by a "main sponsor"
|
||||
This is why it was pretty important for us to state in a very concise way what
|
||||
we really meant by Open. It was also important to clearly distinguish ourselves
|
||||
from prevalent open core solutions like Eucalyptus, which was then the only
|
||||
open source cloud infrastructure platform available.
|
||||
OpenStack is an open source community that was started with the belief that a
|
||||
community of equals, working together in an open collaboration, would produce
|
||||
better software, more aligned to the needs of its users and more largely
|
||||
adopted. It was therefore started from the first day as an open collaboration
|
||||
willing to include as many individuals and organizations as possible, on a
|
||||
level playing field, with everyone involved in designing and developing the
|
||||
solution.
|
||||
|
||||
This was relatively novel: while a few venerable projects like the Linux kernel
|
||||
were set up and perdured as truly open collaborations, most new projects in
|
||||
2010 were just owned by a "main sponsor". This is why it was pretty important
|
||||
for the individuals who participated in the OpenStack community to state in a
|
||||
very concise way what they really meant by 'open'. It was also important to
|
||||
clearly distinguish themselves from prevalent open core solutions like
|
||||
Eucalyptus, which was then the only open source cloud infrastructure platform
|
||||
available.
|
||||
|
||||
It was from these conditions that "The Four Opens" were born. The first public
|
||||
mention of them was posted on the then-nascent OpenStack Wiki on June 28,
|
||||
2010 [#fouropenswiki]_, before OpenStack was even publicly discussed or
|
||||
announced. The titles of the Four Opens (Open source, Open Design, Open
|
||||
announced. The titles of the Four Opens (Open Source, Open Design, Open
|
||||
Development, Open Community) were set from that day. The content evolved a bit
|
||||
over time on the Wiki, as implementation details rolled in (for example: public
|
||||
code reviews, design summits, technical committee, lazy and consensus). The
|
||||
Four Opens description is now maintained officially in the OpenStack governance
|
||||
web-site [#fouropens]_.
|
||||
website [#fouropens]_ and followed by several projects in the open source
|
||||
ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
After eight years, the Four Opens proved pretty resilient, consistently
|
||||
managing to capture the "OpenStack Way" of doing upstream open source
|
||||
development. Under their rule, the OpenStack community grew from tens of
|
||||
contributors to thousands. They were instrumental in the success, the quality
|
||||
and the visibility of the OpenStack software. As this book will show, they also
|
||||
proved applicable to downstream activities such as user feedback gathering,
|
||||
marketing, or event management. As the OpenStack Foundation turns to more
|
||||
generally support Open Infrastructure, the Four Opens will grow beyond
|
||||
OpenStack. Let's apply them to other nascent open source projects with the same
|
||||
success.
|
||||
They were instrumental in the success, the quality and the visibility of the
|
||||
OpenStack software as well as the growth of the community from tens of
|
||||
contributors to thousands over the course of a few years.
|
||||
|
||||
As this book will show how The Four Opens transform open source into open
|
||||
collaboration that is essential to create open source software and other
|
||||
artifacts by a group of individuals and organizations who have a set of common
|
||||
goals and challenges they choose to solve together.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#fourfreedoms] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
|
||||
.. [#fouropenswiki] https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Open&oldid=9628
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user