cinder-specs/specs/kilo/unit-test-cases-for-cinder-scripts.rst
Mike Perez 8ca13afc49 Introduce use case section
This will now require a separate section "Use Cases". This was
originally within "Problem description", but use cases seems to be
missed when it was filled out. This will hopefully improve spec
submission.

Change-Id: I3615ca5ff5c46851e682739a8343242e2f1b0a8d
2015-04-15 22:20:56 -07:00

3.8 KiB

Unit test cases for cinder scripts

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/unit-test-cases-for-cinder-scripts

Currently, there are no unit tests to test bin/cinder-{all, api, backup, manage, rtstool, scheduler, volume}. Adding unit tests for these scripts can help prevent issues similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79791/, as well as increase test coverage.

Problem description

There are no unit tests to test bin/cinder-{all, api, backup, manage, rtstool, scheduler, volume}. Adding unit tests for these scripts can help prevent issues similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79791/, where a non-existent module was imported. Furthermore, it increases the test coverage for each cinder script.

Use Cases

Proposed change

In order to create unit tests for bin/cinder-{all, api, backup, manage, rtstool, scheduler, volume}, we have to move them into cinder/cmd, and use pbr to setup the correct console scripts, which will call the respective main function of each script under cinder/cmd. It will allow us to import from cinder.cmd and individually test each command.

nova already have their scripts under nova/cmd and uses pbr to setup the correct console scripts. It is also the same with glance, where it has unit tests similar to the one proposed, i.e. glance/tests/unit/api/test_cmd.py.

Alternatives

The existing setup can be left as-is and no modifications made. However, this alternative opens up the possibility of more issues similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79791/ being introduced into the cinder code.

Data model impact

None

REST API impact

None

Security impact

None

Notifications impact

None

Other end user impact

None

Performance Impact

None

Other deployer impact

None

Developer impact

None

Implementation

Assignee(s)

Primary assignee:

thangp

Other contributors:

eharney

Work Items

  • Move bin/cinder-{all, api, backup, manage, rtstool, scheduler, volume} into cinder/cmd/cinder{all, api, backup, manage, rtstool, scheduler, volume}.py.
  • Use pbr entry_points to manage the cinder scripts.
  • Create positive and negative unit test cases for each cinder command under cinder/cmd, i.e. cinder{all, api, backup, manage, rtstool, scheduler, volume}.

Dependencies

None

Testing

The goal is to create positive and negative unit tests cases for each cinder script that is currently under bin/.

Documentation Impact

Packagers should be aware of the following changes to setup.cfg.

cinder uses pbr to handle packaging. The cinder scripts that is under the [files] section will be moved to the [entry_points] section of setup.cfg. More specifically, this proposal adds console_scripts to the [entry_points] section of setup.cfg as follows:

[entry_points]
console_scripts =
cinder-all = cinder.cmd.cinder_all:main
cinder-api = cinder.cmd.api:main
cinder-backup = cinder.cmd.backup:main
cinder-manage = cinder.cmd.manage:main
cinder-rtstool = cinder.cmd.rtstool:main
cinder-scheduler = cinder.cmd.scheduler:main
cinder-volume = cinder.cmd.volume:main

This will cause each console script to be installed that executes the main functions found in cinder.cmd.

References