37eba4d8be
Change-Id: I91e3a8ac55ff1f23ee1ab06a36c339fc805a4aa3
67 lines
3.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
67 lines
3.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _stable_branches:
|
||
|
||
.. toctree::
|
||
:maxdepth: 2
|
||
|
||
==============================
|
||
Backporting to stable/branches
|
||
==============================
|
||
|
||
Since murano is a big-tent OS project it largely follows the
|
||
`openstack stable branch guide <http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html>`_
|
||
|
||
Upstream support phases
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
||
#. Phase I (first 6 months): All bugfixes (which meet the stable port criteria,
|
||
described in OS stable branch policy) are appropriate
|
||
#. Phase II (6-12 months): Only critical bugfixes and
|
||
security patches are acceptable
|
||
#. Phase III (more than 12 months): Only security
|
||
patches are acceptable
|
||
|
||
In order to accept a change into $release it must first be accepted into all
|
||
releases back to master.
|
||
|
||
There are two notable exceptions to the support phases rule:
|
||
|
||
- murano-apps repository:
|
||
We recognise, that murano apps have different lifecycle than main murano
|
||
repository. Most of the time new apps are being written for already released
|
||
versions of murano, not for master. Having a rich collection of apps is one of
|
||
the goals of murano-apps repository, therefore we accept backports of apps and
|
||
app features to previous release branches. This is done on a case by case basis
|
||
and should be discussed with PTL and Murano core members on IRC or Mailing
|
||
List. However we believe, that submitting an app to stable branch only means
|
||
that author of the patch is not going to support the app. Therefore for the app
|
||
to get backported it still has to be first accepted to master and all
|
||
subsequent releases.
|
||
|
||
- murano core library patches: Murano Core Library is an
|
||
app, that provides core functionality and classes for other murano apps. It
|
||
shares a lot of properties of regular murano apps and the rationale behind
|
||
allowing backports of MuranoPL code from master to stable branches is basically
|
||
the same: low regression risks during upgrades, high adoption impact. However
|
||
since core library is much more sensitive app, backports to it should be taken
|
||
more seriously and should be discussed on IRC and Mailing List and receive
|
||
PTL’s approval.
|
||
|
||
These two exceptions do not mean, that we’re free to backport
|
||
any code from master to stable branches. Instead they show, that murano team
|
||
recognises the importance of these two areas of murano project and treats
|
||
exceptions to those slightly more liberally than to other parts of murano
|
||
project.
|
||
|
||
Bug nomination process
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
||
Whenever you file a bug, or see a bug, that you think
|
||
is eligible for backporting in stable branch nominate it for the corresponding
|
||
series. If bug reporter does not nominate the bug for eligible branch — this is
|
||
done by murano bug supervisor during triaging/confirmation process. In case it
|
||
is not clear whether the bug is eligible or not or if you do not have
|
||
permissions to nominate a bug for series you can set
|
||
`$release-backport-potential` tag (for example `liberty-backport-potential`).
|
||
Murano team is holding bi-weekly meetings on IRC (as part of regular community
|
||
meetings) to triage and nominate bugs for stable backports.
|