openstack/deb-python-taskflow
Code Issues Proposed changes

Merge "Address concurrent mutation of sqlalchemy backend"

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jenkins
2015-07-17 18:25:33 +00:00
committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent 55af7135e2 1f3752cb10
commit 3db3b86f02
1 changed files with 8 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
taskflow/persistence/backends/impl_sqlalchemy.py
View File

@@ -243,14 +243,15 @@ class SQLAlchemyBackend(base.Backend):
self._engine = engine
self._owns_engine = False
else:
self._engine = None
self._engine = self._create_engine(self._conf)
self._owns_engine = True
self._validated = False
def _create_engine(self):
@staticmethod
def _create_engine(conf):
# NOTE(harlowja): copy the internal one so that we don't modify it via
# all the popping that will happen below.
conf = copy.deepcopy(self._conf)
conf = copy.deepcopy(conf)
engine_args = {
'echo': _as_bool(conf.pop('echo', False)),
'convert_unicode': _as_bool(conf.pop('convert_unicode', True)),
@@ -320,8 +321,6 @@ class SQLAlchemyBackend(base.Backend):
@property
def engine(self):
if self._engine is None:
self._engine = self._create_engine()
return self._engine
def get_connection(self):
@@ -336,15 +335,11 @@ class SQLAlchemyBackend(base.Backend):
return conn
def close(self):
if self._engine is not None and self._owns_engine:
# NOTE(harlowja): Only dispose of the engine and clear it from
# our local state if we actually own the engine in the first
# place. If the user passed in their own engine we should not
# be disposing it on their behalf (and we shouldn't be clearing
# our local engine either, since then we would just recreate a
# new engine if the engine property is accessed).
# NOTE(harlowja): Only dispose of the engine if we actually own the
# engine in the first place. If the user passed in their own engine
# we should not be disposing it on their behalf...
if self._owns_engine:
self._engine.dispose()
self._engine = None
self._validated = False