Flavio Percoco 2f813a9097 Remove reviewers section from template ... When this template was created, the intention behind this section was to know the got-to people for specific specs. Questions like: Who should I ping if I need more Glance insights? Who should I ping to actually get reviews? etc Unfortunately, The reviewers section has turned to a field mostly used to highlight people interested in a specific feature. More often than not, the revieweres listed in this section are not the ones reviewing the patches for the spec. In addition to the above, this section currently separates core reviewers from non-cores. This separation brings no value to this section nor the spec itself. Regardless the size of the team, this section is not bringing any value to the process as reviewers not in this list can as well review the patches as much as the reviewers listed there can also not review the patches. Change-Id: I973d97e82f4561de8d4ac33672494eae0fc15925		2016-05-13 15:37:10 -05:00
..
api	Glance sorting API specification	2015-03-11 17:02:22 +03:00
glanceclient	Add session-object blueprint for glanceclient	2015-04-16 12:22:52 +10:00
juno	Fix title for Juno's spec repo	2015-05-11 14:04:16 +02:00
kilo	Fix deactivate/reactivate error to 403 in spec	2015-08-13 10:30:03 -05:00
liberty	Move spec under mitaka	2016-01-21 20:41:40 -04:30
mitaka	Merge "Update 'Alternatives' section of the import spec"	2016-04-25 14:57:04 +00:00
newton	Move spec for removing downgrades to right place	2016-05-09 12:32:32 -04:00
lite-specs.rst	Initial lite-specs.rst and per deliverable folders	2016-03-08 18:41:06 +00:00
template.rst	Remove reviewers section from template	2016-05-13 15:37:10 -05:00