openstack
/
governance
Code Issues Proposed changes

Update patch set 3 

Patch Set 3: Code-Review-1

(3 comments)

Patch-set: 3
Reviewer: Gerrit User 13252 <13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=-1, 9d8c5cc481ad83b40e033fb943f79ce81c3c455a
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 13252 \u003c13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_13252\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 13252 2024-03-07 07:35:25 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent 7395411836
commit b328c94312
1 changed files with 51 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

51
e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270
View File

@ -16,6 +16,57 @@
"message": "I think the TC should hold off on this general policy statement and discuss it with the releases team at the upcoming PTG. In the meantime, to deal with the murano situation, Jay has posted a special-purpose resolution to allow us to make the murano project inactive past the M-2 deadline:\n\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/910434\n\nIMO, we should endorse the above and then immediately approve Ghanshyam\u0027s inactivate-murano patch:\n\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/908859\n\nBut whatever course we take, we should do it soon.",
"revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "ff8b58fb_87436e74",
"filename": "reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst",
"patchSetId": 3
},
"lineNbr": 81,
"author": {
"id": 13252
},
"writtenOn": "2024-03-07T07:35:25Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I would be fine with adding just this part",
"revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "c290457f_6556d039",
"filename": "reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst",
"patchSetId": 3
},
"lineNbr": 98,
"author": {
"id": 13252
},
"writtenOn": "2024-03-07T07:35:25Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I would want the TC to make a decision in that case and not delegate this to the release team. Like with a special resolution just as for the murano case.",
"revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "3bd1f80d_356d3689",
"filename": "reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst",
"patchSetId": 3
},
"lineNbr": 102,
"author": {
"id": 13252
},
"writtenOn": "2024-03-07T07:35:25Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Well we can always override gate jobs via zuul config or ask the opendev team to merge patches. So making this a mandatory part of the \"inactive\" process would seem useful to me.",
"revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
}
]
}